Member Info for Daveavt

You could lower your costs, after you've paid off your astronomical land and equipment costs, but you can't 'run it off solar'. It simply isn't efficient enough.

How is it incorrect? They say that bit mining uses as much energy as it takes to power all of Denmark continuously. Could we power Denmark on solar power continuously alone, with no other power source? No.

anyway, the subject is moot as black cactus are no longer mining bit currencies, so let's stick to what they are doing.

Read the title of the post, solar power....

What do you mean solid day, did the fundamentals of the business change for some reason?

Doc, it says transaction, not the actual coin.

Your post on 30/12/17 at 13.21.' the question is when people start to join up the dots and see a different picture and hey presto a paradigm shift has taken place! for me ive seen the paradigm shift and bought when many bought at 0.6p and above who have either sold at a loss? average down?'.....and your NEXT reply to that ..'And there we have it...i said I bought when MANY BOUGHT AT 0.6P OR ABOVE. Nice try ...do you want me to repeat it ' - so explain to everyone, how you DIDN'T buy at 0.6 and above, as you just said you did, twice!

What are you on about, you have now said twice that you bought at 0.6. Do you want me to copy and paste again what you wrote?

Based on it's turnover, if it was physical company With premises, and employees, it would have gone bust, but because it's a shell company, using a virtual office, and only employs people on contract as and when, it can still 'exist'. And that's the problem with aim.

And to your question with answering every positive with a negative. No, you haven't posted positives, you've ramped and made stuff up. And I've countered with facts. So I've answered every made up claim with facts. A bit like your last post 'Not seen a more professional bod on aim.' Here's the facts to that comment. Regarding their last rns, they just quoted they are in a license with black cactus (which according to black cac.tus hasn't even been finalized), the software in the licence we have found to be defunct or disbanded, proven, they want to give away 30 percent of the company, and they admitted everything they have done to date they are ditching through failure, oh and their last accounts had them at 74k turnover. Those 'facts' are only negative to you, because you ramp and make stuff up.

amp/s/motherboard.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/ywbbpm/bitcoin-mining-electricity-consumption-ethereum-energy-climate-change - 'One bitcoin transaction uses as much electricity as your house consumes in a week'

Firstly, solar can never generate enough, secondly, I don't know why you think bit mining is relevant, as black cactus have ditched bit mining because all of their hardware was seized by the loan company.

And per your last line, no you don't need the board to '.announce their products', as all previous product announcements as we found were vapourware. We need to see hard proof and contracts. If they say they have made a 'mobile app' which we have seen them mention previously, then 100% it needs to be on the apple or android store. It's not like it can be anywhere else is it. If they contracts with businesses, then the names listed, not their previous rnss which say 'we have made a deal with a payroll company' etc.....oh which according to the last rns was cancelled for example. (And if it was cancelled, why?)

And once again, a pure speculative post. we have only discussed only a few posts ago, that the current 'rns deal' hasn't even been actioned or completed, until shareholders are asked whether they want to give away 30 percent of the company and here you are saying 'milestone are doing this and that' etc, 'and the alleged bad press before Christmas has had no repercussions' yet black cactuses share price is dropping and dropping solidly. The reason I have so many posts on here, though less than everyone else, is because it's repetition of the same points against people who just want to argue back with insults. Normal, non invested people, not 'paid rampers', (and yes if you are invested you are 'paid' as you think you'll make money if you ramp the share price) would look at the facts and think ah yes, let's wait until any company physically has something to show, is marketing it, and actually making money, not make up big guesses based on absolutely nothing.

I mean, let's give them all the benefit of the doubt. Let's say they are all working on blockchain products. Going by all the companies open admittance that everything they have done to date has failed, all 3 companies, would you bet any money that they can be successful at this project? I mean, it's not just something you 'have a try at'. You've got to be the best to be ahead in the software world, ignoring the fact you have to be able to market it too.

Oh and I forgot, world on wireless, the company no one can contact, find any details for, dormant company according to companies house, no internet presence whatsoever, according to black cactuses news release, they also have 'blockchain services'...

..and not forgetting black cactus holdings, the third linked company, failed tv streaming services, defunct music platform, disbanded rewards and voucher schemes, holidays and travel schemes, WIX free websites galore.....now having their own 'blockchain platform'....

Of which Envoy are in the exact same category, a failed energy drink distributor (which actually the distribution deal was never actioned according to their June filing) now all of a sudden being 'one of the leaders in blockchain technology'...

So once again, an rns stating things that actually haven't happened yet, and no present completion date. And an rns where the company quite openly says everything previous has failed and they have disbanded previous programs, and now they are going to focus on 'blockchain'. Brings up the point of the link I posted earlier today, where the SEC are going to be investigating floated companies jumping on the blockchain wagon in case of fraud. https://www.coindesk.com/sec-branch-trolls-blockchain-stock-pumpers/

That's quite a good point, because on the u.s filing for this they state ' (a) Upon the execution of this Agreement sufficient fully paid Ordinary Shares of the Licensee which represents Twenty Nine and One Half percent (29.5%) of the then Issued Capital of the Licensee (the “Fee”), free and clear of all taxes upon, subject to receiving all necessary regulatory approvals from the AIM Exchange. The closing of the granting of the License Grant for the Term under this Agreement (the “Closing”) shall occur at a place mutually acceptable to Licensor and Licensee on December 4, 2017, or such other date that is mutually acceptable to Licensor and Licensee (the “Closing Date”). All transactions which are to take place at the Closing shall be considered to have taken place simultaneously, and no delivery or payment shall be considered to have been made until all the transactions have been completed. - seeing as the rns was announced on the 6th, that's after the 4th, and seeing as shareholder approval hasn't been sought yet, this agreement hasn't even been executed / finalised. Any next rns from msg should be regarding this.