Member Info for Daveavt

I claimed for the most of the day it was a failed placing because when I first said it was a previous investor increasing their position, everyone on here, the ramp fest claimed I was wrong wrong wrong, so that was the next viable option seeing as a market maker was collecting shares on an open market. Never listen to the rampers, I was actually right.

What does it matter if he buys more, sells more, he is an investor like you or I. What this guy is doing is totally up to him, why are you so obsessed with what he is doing. You seem to focus on anything other than what the actual company is meant to be doing.

Tony, 32 million times 0.4, is 150k, the same as the last lot he sold, and now bought again. I've told you to slow down and think but you go straight in and put your foot in it. A few posts ago, you were adamant it wasn't s king, and now you agree. I don't even bother pulling you up on every error, as I would be here all day, longer than I am already..

That's his total holding, he seems to buy and sell 150k. What have I told you about slowing down and thinking before you type Tony?

It always seems to be £150 grand his his trading pot, rinse and repeat.

Playing the trading game as he did previously again. Though as you just pointed out, he has half the investment in this share as he used to.

Steven king, existing previous holder has increased it to 5.16.

It is s king, check the very newest news article on milestones website, it lists his name and the broker and that exact number of shares. Like I said, you don't check anything, waaay to keen to type...

It turns out my first hunch was right. you lot don't seem to do any research what so ever on anything, wrong on every turn, contradicting each other, you can't seem to decide which ramp you are going to use.

At least a few of you did correct some of the blatant rampers. I did like the way I said right at the start it's a previous investor increasing their share and you all jumped down my neck calling me wrong and stupid, then I figure, well if it's not an investor increasing, what kind of market maker buys shares at open value, and I get 'they aren't a market maker', and them

Oh well, doesn't matter really does it, I was making a point he was a 'previous investor'. Don't be bitter it's not a new one.

Yes Stephen king was previously an investor, he purchased shares previous to the other day, and he was also, using your logic a 'previous, previous' investor, as he used to have a holding last year and sold it all. So right on both counts. End of the day, it's someone we already know about and been involved with the company for years, PREVIOUSLY lol. Want to keep going around in circles?

I'll simplify it for doc who is still drunk. The guy isn't any one new. That OK?

'Existing'? Lol, if he is an existing holder, then he held shares PREVIOUS to when he bought the other day. Is English not your first language or something?

And to be honest, he really is a 'previous' investor using logic as he bought in and sold out and bought back in before.

'A current investor increasing his holding', right I don't know about you, but to increase something I must have to have had something 'previously'...

What did you actually just write there lol

So all the ramping saying 'ooh some big investment company has bought in' was wrong and it was a previous investor, which I said **right at the beginning**, increasing his holding.

So I was actually right the first time around, and the company hasn't recovered it's placing funds either.

Tony, going by the article that doc just posted, it's not apparently the placing company, it's Stephen king just increasing his holding. Excitement over.