Member Info for Daveavt

Nope, but what has happened is black cactus has been caught doing paid for advertisements, actually trying to get people to buy shares, where as normal companies, if they were going to pay to advertise, would do so for their goods and services with contact details. No, this advert reads like a dodgy timeshare advert, enticing you to 'get in now before it's too late', check out all the bits in bold. Now why would a company be advertising for people to buy shares instead of it's (non existent) services lol.... http://dailystocktraders.com/BLGI/

Combined with the personal insults, moaning and whining like children, you can see how I can think this...

My point was you lot were bringing up things that were very naive and inexperienced in how the world works, and sound like youngsters reading off an advert. Putting that together with knowing you're invested in here with no research, I would assume you're very young and new to this.

So much time, I've posted about 700 times on here, about 30 seconds a post, that's 6 hours out of 3 months approximately. You lot probably spent more time watching blockchain videos, learning about what blockchain is after investing in a company that has less of a clue about blockchain than you lot do lol

Oh so now you're disagreeing with the people that actually provide the blockchain source? As per the article, no one is left behind, you only need to use blockchain if you need to use blockchain.

Makes a good point about what I said about how the blockchain interacts in use real world. They wrote ' If the database says that I own 10 units of something, who will allow me to claim those 10 units in the real world? Who do I sue if I can’t convert what’s written in the blockchain into traditional physical assets?' which is a good point once you start removing all these people that were previously in the process. Not only that, say own ten of something, real things, that you remove from a store in the real world, physically take them. How does the blockchain know what level the stock it after you have walked out with them? Only by a HUMAN telling the system the stock has been taken, manually, barcode scan etc, so once again you have the element of incorrect data on the chain, so again 'not incorruptible'. Whenever a transaction, or data entry meets the human element, an end or start point, then the blockchain can simply be a highly accurate database of incorrect data. Garbage in is always garbage out.

Here's an article straight from the horses mouth, this is from Multichain who are one of the world's blockchain platforms where developers go to for assistance in building blockchain programs, and where you can actually download the blockchain source.. https://www.multichain.com/blog/2015/11/avoiding-pointless-blockchain-project/

Of course it's useful for some applications, and doccoc, diverting plays away from your artist is not a fraudulent transaction. This is nothing to do with 'fiddling money' it's to do with diverting data for whatever reason you want. All of the money could be accounted for, all tax paid, everything legit, it's just internally, you can make the data which has nothing to do with financials say what ever you want.

Are you guys adults? I don't know how old you are, because you're bringing up cash as if that was eliminated the problem is solved. You could have a website where half the products are sold on a blockchain database to one set of accounts, and another blockchain going to a different set of accounts. Yes two blockchains, they don't have to be linked in anyway you know. So you could manipulate your turnover figures. As my example with Taylor swift, spotify if it wanted to could stream half the plays on blockchain, accountable, and the other half on a different blockchain that Taylor swift isn't connected to. She would be none the wiser.

this is the whole point, the chain is incorruptible, the human entry and exit points are not. At some point the chain has to interact with the real world. Would you buy a house off someone via blockchain, if it's so secure?. Currently you have solicitors involved both ends, id checks, money checks, third parties involved verifying the people in the REAL world are who they say they are. People say that blockchain could remove all of this, yes it can, but not the NEED for it by us humans. Would you sign over a house or pay all your money to a complete stranger, just because he has his blockchain keys? How do you know he is the person that is meant to be responsible for those keys? So let's go a step further, let's take fingerprint or Isis recognition off of everyone, so to make a transaction you have to put your finger on a Biometrics scanner to prove it's you. Sounds good yeah? But where is all this Biometrics data going to be stored...on the blockchain. Every single node is going to contain all of your highly highly personal data. All out there on the cloud. Do you want that, do you think the public will trust that?. It doesn't matter that the data can be incorruptible, it matters that it can be accessed.

OK I'll make it simpler for you, a pub with two tills, one goes onto the accounts, the other doesn't and goes in the landlords pocket. Jesus.

Did you really just write that lol

It's no different to a shop having a till and taking cash. The till is blockchain, all logged and accounted for, but the shop still did cash for identical items along side it. So the figure given to the tax man at the end of year, is wrong. Simple as that.

Yes, but as I said, the only incorruptible bit is what's in the blockchain, humans still have to decide what goes into the blockchain and what doesn't. That's what people don't realise, end points! Also, the fact that blockchain has no privacy is a whole another can of worms.

The only reason you know about blockchain, is because a digital currency used it. If they didn't, it would still be sitting in the past like the minidisc, a great little concept, but just couldn't get everyone to jump onto it.

Jesus, there is nothing blockchain can do that MySQL can't apart from be incorruptible, but as I showed seeing as HUMANS are in charge of what goes into the blockchain database, it's pretty much moot. There is a reason why blockchain has been around since the 90s and every database runs on a variant of like MySQL or any other centralized database, because it's so much EASIER to implement.

As I keep saying, they could have done at any point in the last 20 years. Having companies agree on using the same system is nothing to do with blockchain. Going round in circles here...

And he STILL doesn't get it. For blockchain to work how they want EVERYONE has to use it. It's nothing to do with evolution, everyone could have decided to use a fully automated system at any point in the last 20 years, and blockchain has been around for more than 20 years, no one took it on, because there is no point one person taking it on unless everyone else will. The tech is irrelevant, it's marketing. Once you understand blockchain is just a different method of storing data and stop thinking it's some evolution, you will understand.

Exactly.

Top, you really are stretching it a bit, you think milestone has a chance as good as anyone? OK forgetting the fact they only turned over 22 grand and have no programming experience what so ever, if you want to talk about the music industry changing to blockchain, who do you think is going to reprogram iTunes.....the multi billion dollar Apple, or will milestone 'have a chance'. What about Google music? Will milestone have a chance above GOOGLE? if you honestly think milestone have a chance, please tell me who and why they would have an edge over any other company? Crazy.