Member Info for Daveavt

I just confirmed what you just said. The deal hasn't been done. I don't think I'm imagining it, it's there just below my post...

Yes black cactus getting 30 percent of the company isn't a good thing, so you'd expect most of the holders to reject it. No deal has been done, no licensing. Nothing. Thanks for confirming.

Selling here, because everyone is selling across the pond at black cactus. The share price has dropped solidly since it 'reinvented' itself, with every news release they try and pull out making no impact, because they see the smoke and mirrors like they did when they were Envoy. If you want to talk about a company other than this one, why don't you talk about that instead of some unrelated mining company.

Anyway, what's the next positive you have on this list. Because once again you've started talking about other companies that have no relevance and 'how many shares you think you can't buy'.

I just did a dummy buy for 100k, no problem. And I still don't know why you keep going on about two mining companies, what relevance has that got to do with anything?? It doesn't matter if they have earned no money, it's proving a physical asset. Milestone have debt, failed at every project, failed at simple business deals, and have no products, assets or revenue! Nothing Tony. You and I both have more than milestone and black cactus does.

Looks like everyone else doesn't agree with your 'positive' Tony. Got any others, because trying to title every post of yours as 'wrong Davie' or 'strong buy' doesn't have any effect, and the fact you think it would, that maybe people would think 'oh I'll buy into this share because someone titled a post 'strong buy' is comical.

And Tony, we've been on this share for months, that failed placing was only done a couple of days ago. So what positives have you got since last year?? come on, I'm all ears...

Are you actually trying to turn the fact that the company was so incompetent at vetting it's own investors, that it managed to lose out on 1.25 million, and you think it's a plus point they managed to get a mere 150k out of them? Seriously? Please list your next 'positive'. Also, you don't seem to consider that maybe the whole failed placing was a ploy to drive up the share price. 'We have a placing of 1.25 million...share price rockets....'sorry, they don't want to do it now'....really Tony..

In fact, if you only had one employee, it would mean you turnover more than this company did last year lol

*defending*

And Tony, you say you have 7 employees, that means your company does more revenue than the company you spend all your life depending. Think about that for a second..

Tony, if I could list some positives I would. I've challenged you to list some positives and you've never done it yourself. Go on, list ANY positive about what this business has done/doing. If you think it's that easy, do it.

Oh Tony, if that's how you think, that's tragic. Nuog and Sula have physical assets, real stuff, not just news releases of software no one can see. A mine is a real thing, it always has value, even if you designed the best bit of software in the world, if you're crap at marketing or support, you'll fail as a business. This is what people forget, you could be the best programmer in the world, but if you're crap at business, you don't make any money. The share price is drifting because black cactuses is also plummeting. Day after day big drops, and their next q10 filing is only 4 days away and seeing as they have issued no news any revenues, contracts, or any evidence they have even bought a mouse for a computer, it's probably going to be worse than the last one.

That actually sounded like begging. Seeing as you get so upset by what is being written on a screen, and have to filter people so you don't see what you don't want to see, I don't think it's me that needs councilling. What's strange is you all think I'm in the wrong, yet the share price is plummeting, same with black cactus over the pond, so the way I think is in the majority. Investors are seeing what I see. But you 5, and yes it's about 5 of you on here think your opinion is correct.

This is all written in old rns's so you wouldn't have to Google it anyway.

I don't think your guy is too sharp on Googling. Th crestgate, an investment company, bought Redcorp, the operator of the mining asset. So that's how they 'got into mining'

There you go, it could have been almost written by myself, it puts across what I've been saying. All of this isn't a tech issue, it's a people issue. Blockchain has been around before the invention of the internet, but it's not the point that someone has to run with it. Many people have to run with it, at once, working together. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/12/09/blockchain-bitcoin-save-music-industry/

Nexstar media is one of milestone and black cactus hocus pocus websites nexstar.org Another made in 5 minutes WIX website with no contact or company details.

Doc from that post you don't even understand blockchain. It's not like VHS etc, it's not how slow or fast you can get units out there, it's more like multiple companies are out there making each part for the VHS player, and half of them haven't started making it, or won't be. Until then, the chain of parts that make the player isn't completed. CHAIN. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE WORD?

Yawn, OK ah you still don't get it, I'll explain it very simply. Tomorrow, I'm going to a make website selling music, same price as iTunes and Google play, and every artist on the world can put their music on it, and for every track they sell I'm going to give each artist a million quid each. Yes a million quid, and a crown. How amazing for the artists is that? That's like the best thing ever for the artists. Now, all I need to do is convince all the PUBLIC in the world to use my website over the industry behemoths of iTunes and Google play. Haven't got a clue how, or the funding behind me, or is there any incentive for the public to use me, or the fact iPhone users can't download off my app. For the last time, if artists wanted to have their own website selling direct to the public they could have done that any time in the last 20 years and it doesn't even need blockchain, as THEY are handling everything themselves, there is no trust element. Put that one to bed now..