Member Info for Daveavt

Join their club, they need a shoulder to cry on lol

Why would I be bitter?? I'm the one not sitting at a loss, and up. You lot are hilarious, you're all here trying to back each other like some circle jerk support group, giving virtual cuddles to each other, crying every time I post, and think for some unknown reason that I'm bitter about something, God knows what though.

But it wasn't a major deal was it, it was only 450k, and they were already spending hundreds of k previously. This went to the moon because it was a complete surprise, and rampers were making up stories, like they actually design cancer drugs. If you go back and read the posts, the nonsense being spouted was amazing. Now everyone knows what is what, knows it's just dosage modelling, realises the contracts are small, and values it 5 to 7p, even on news.

Jack, is doesn't matter if he thinks it's the best thing since sliced bread, if average Joe investor doesn't and sells out it makes his shares worth less. It doesn't matter what he thinks, it only matters what everyone thinks, and they all think it's worth 5 to 7p.

Well unfortunately not everyone is as sharp as me.

..companies haven't been already doing that lol

Seriously, do you think pharmas have just been 'guessing' their dosages? Or maybe using all the other multi million dollar companies that do similar things, the big guys. Pyc only do modeling for tumors, dosing for those type of drugs. Last time I looked, pharmas produce thousands of drugs for thousands of ailments, pretty sure they know how to select dosing requirements before pyc came along..you lot seem to think pharmas are going to be wetting their knickers that a company can model dosing in a computer, as if these multi billion dollar compa

'nor why any Pharma business would bother employing their non essential services.',.....er, that's the reason why this company has made less revenues than a local corner shop and ran at a loss for the past ten years! Because they don't! You can't argue with figures...

The peers that have been bought out do millions in revenues. Not 'peers' at all.

The rns also said it doesn't expect it to be anymore than 500k. There is no benefit to anyone buying them out, they are running at a loss. Why would you want to use a companies services and pay more than you did before you owned it?

And 'cancer research company'? What? This isn't a cancer research company. They do computer modelling simulations to work out dosing requirements for known working drugs! It's not going to 'save lives' or 'help cure cancer', it's a totally non essential service. I knew people haven't got a clue what they are invested in.

Yes that's the biggest load of horse manure I've read so far.

Shaz, I'm sure he has......at this price. notice he didn't buy in at all the stupid prices much higher. Thanks for proving my point. Anyone buying down here and below is not a bad punt.

Lol my 'second hand bangers' turn over more revenue in a few months than pyc does in a year. Are you as excited about that?

So by that logic if I start making trainers tomorrow I'm a peer of Nike am i? Based on 'the work it does and the potential it has'? Ludicrous lol. You can't base a companies 'potential' on someone else's potential other wise by your logic every company in the world should be doing as well as every other. No, some fail, or make next to no money. Like this one. It's been doing what it does for the last ten years, and it's 'peers' have surpassed it in half the time. If it had potential it should have done it by now. Stop dreaming and get with reality.

go and find a company doing drug dosage modelling, that has next to no assets and revenue, and compare that lol

Right, so seeing those companies are doing tens to hundreds of millions in revenue, and this company isn't even at 700 grand, on what planet can you compare them? Do you realise what 'peer' means? Of similar standing. These couldn't be as far opposite.

Yeah here is something, why do you lot keep 'comparing' this company to others, that are doing million more in revenue. It's like you see they have a high share price so think that 'well pyc should be the same'. Instead of saying 'pyc' should be the same as them, the question should be 'why isn't pyc the same as them'. Your logic is if you started selling trainers, you should be the same price as Nike because they sell trainers. I've never seen so many people on a share talk about other companies other than their own lol

Completely different tech, completely different business hence why it's doing 125 million, and a report written by a broker trying to get people to buy shares through them.

Why is that 'interesting', that company does completely different things to pyc, and it's revenue was about 125 MILLION a year lol. Are you trying to imply that's somehow similar to pyc's situation?