Member Info for Daveavt

Hold, on you just said it was never mentioned as a partner, now you're agreeing with me. How much was priced in, all of it, and the price was dropping too. No one really cared because all that matters is revenues. And you've had two placings since!

http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=p7svasja&ArticleHeadline=Disclosure_of_Large_Pharma_partner_Merck__Co

Oh and spaz, not worth '500k min per annum'. It said quite clearly they don't expect it to be any more than 500k, there is NO fixed term and can't guarantee if any future revenues will be the same. That's what is written in black and white in the price movement rns. So that doesn't say '500k min per annum' at all....it says '500k for one year, no guarantees of anymore or the same'

Oh spaz, is this your new profile.? 'First post' lol. As I already confirmed, back in 2014 pyc had already disclosed they were working with Merck, it's all there in black and white in the rns, and the rns for the virtual tumor told us how much money they were spending 'expected revenues to be the same as all 2013 and 2014 revenues'. Again all there in black and white in the rns. Look forward to you spamming the boards and no one will invest lol.

Tell us again how Merck and their revenues were never mentioned. And you tell me to do research lol. The irony is whatever information or personal thoughts and season's you invested in, you made a mistake. Obviously you thought 'Blimey, Merck has just appeared and spending 500k', and were TOTALLY wrong eh.

Look at spaz still talking, makes a total cock up 5 times in a row and now wants to try and divert the attention away to a 'short position' conspiracy. Tell me spaz, what's the difference between a 'simple' partnership, a phrase you just MADE UP, and a 'master services' agreement. Please explain the exact differences between these two. Why would they 'need' modelling services from pyc?. They don't NEED modelling services from pyc. That's why they have only spent a few hundred k a year. They employ nearly 60,000 people, they spend about 10 times that supplying them free tea or coffee as an example, just to put it into perspective...go on, put your foot in it for a 6th time..

Take Shaz below, posts of utter garbage saying Merck had never been mentioned previously, nor what they were spending. So I completely disprove that with two official rns's from years ago. Made himself look a fool...do you reckon he is going to shh from now on and retain a little dignity, probably not. Ramp ramp ramp..

because what I'm saying isn't nonsense, and the market agrees with my predictions. Where as you spout waffle which is completely contrary to what's happening. But still you persist, sod knows why.

Including the bit I don't like.??...did I not just write 'It's not like I'm excluding the past week, I'm including the rise, and the fall'. You're not too sharp on replying to me are you. ?Slow down, read a bit, instead of rushing to type something that had already been answered.

Apple, because you are lse's biggest ramper, you really do believe people invest based on what is written on a forum. They don't. There are loads of rampers on here, only one of me. Price goes down though. So why are they all listening to me by your logic and not you and the rest? Two reasons, people don't invest by reading what's on here, or no body believes what the rampers say, and with good reason, because the price does exactly the opposite of what they say it will. So either way, with those two scenarios, why do you spend so much time wasting your time ramping?

Seems I have to refer you back to my previous post, 'If points were 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5 7, 8, 6.6...you wouldn't say thats still rising would you'. Do you think arguing is going to change the outcome for some reason. More buys than sells this week, price rose, buys and sells flattened out a bit Thursday but finished down, Friday way way more sells than buys, price dropped. But you think it's still going up? Righty ho lol

You can't exclude the bit you don't like lol. It's not like I'm excluding the past week, I'm including the rise, and the fall. Hell, if you want to exclude stuff to make yourself feel better, may as well exclude the last few months and go 'woo, 30p'..

What part of you've reached the peak and it's now dropping off don't you get. Your spin is 'forget the last two days of it dropping, look at last week'. How is that for a misleading spin?

Exactly. Get the graph of the last two days, draw a curve, tell me if your hand goes up or down at the end.

how is it a 'rising growth pattern'....? It's been up higher and now on it way down again. If that's your logic then 5p after the 30p must be a rising growth pattern because it was 1p previously. If points were 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5 7, 8, 6.6...you wouldn't say thats still rising would you lol..... on no news it has climbed, just like all the other times it has climbed on no news, and every time it has retraced, just like it is doing now, and proving for the 5th time around 8p is the upper limit, though this time it didn't even make it to 8.

That's all folks!

oh come on now rampers, throw in the towel at least, you've just seen it can't even hold 7 as I said, even with all the strong buy ratings, charts saying its gonna go to the moon, and a load of ramping. I was even quiet yesterday just so you didn't think the reason it wasn't going where you wanted it to be was because of me. What 'retest of 8'?, it never made it to 8, and even in the past when it was sitting at 8 on the downtrend, when news came out it DROPPED to 7. How many times does this share have to buckle at 7p before you lot admit reality?

Do you listen to your own posts? Today you said 10p, then you changed it to 7.5 to 8p, then it actually closed at 6.88. Now you're saying it again lol. I'm sure I'm not the only one here that thinks you're a little deranged...

I'm pretty sure 5p is always better than 7. What would you prefer, buy in at 5 and sell at 7, or buy in at 7 and sell at 7. Or buy in at 7 and watch it go to 5. Or like many, buy in much higher and not give a sh*t about 5, 6 or 7 lol

I'd be stating the obvious..