Member Info for Daveavt

Going by every single one of your posts, nothing. If you were an outsider looking at your posts every day and seeing they are wrong every day, what would you think of that persons 'honest opinion' lol

I don't even think the replacement bus service turned up to be honest...

'Back' to 8p? Can you highlight when it's ever sat at 8p other than briefly through a spike? There has never been any support level at 8p, let alone 7p.

..investors think the giant pharmaceutical company Merck is a customer of pyc, where it's actually a German company of the same name ?that has no affiliation, both independent of each other, who's main line of business is lcd crystals for tv's and displays, in fact it's the largest supplier in the world of lcd crystals. It's second biggest business is pigments for the cosmetics industry. Healthcare only makes up 1 billion of it's 16 billion revenue via a subsidiary.

You spelt telling the truth wrong. It's just only evident today that many interve

Seriously, day after day, the same rubbish. Why do you do it? Do you actually think share prices are influenced by what you write on a forum?

Pyc isn't working with the u.s Merck, they are working with Merck KGaA, actually a different company.

Where are these massive buy orders RiskRegretRepeat?

I don't think the market does.

Do you still trust your opinion?

Yes all that is why the share price is at the heady price of 6 to 7 p from 1p only a few months ago.

It's called realism, everything I've written is backed up with rns. All the rampers today have lied, and made up stuff that isn't in rns. Like yourself and spaz, the same person, saying that Merck had never been announced, then changing your tune when I proved otherwise. Do you even know what a 'master services agreement' is? Look it up.

They haven't signed a multi year agreement. It says quite clearly that they "**envisage** it to be multi year, with no fixed term and no guarantees of similar revenue". I don't know if you have a difficult grasp of the English language, but envisage is a hopeful statement of possibility, and if it says no fixed term it means they have no guarantees of further years or similar revenue. They wrote this, not me. So on what planet is it a multi year contract? Not this one...

Just for reference regarding when Merck first signed up...'The Merck contract runs for 14 months and involves Physiomics scientists working closely with Merck Serono scientists to develop and calibrate a model that can predict optimal combination partners for both marketed and pipeline drugs. Revenue from the contract will fall over the next two year and is in the region of the total value of all of Physiomics 2013/2014 sales – £267,000. "This represents the most significant deal in Physiomics' history,” said Dr Mark Chadwick, chief executive of Physiomics.' So they were already getting 267k for 14 months work, now we have 440k for 12 months work, so less than a 200k increase. And that's why the share price is where it is.

Exactly, who do you think is doing all the dosage modelling for all their other drugs? And they haven't signed a multi year agreement, it says it has no fixed term and no guarantees it will be more than a year or even similar revenue. Learn to read, or stop lying. And exactly why do you think it's such a meaningless amount. As I put in context before, they employ 60,000 people, even if they gave everyone 20p worth of free coffee a day, that's 5 million quid a year. The cleaners who have a contract most likely get more than 500k revenue in a year. Let that sink in when you try and make a deal of a billion dollar company spending pocket change on a non essential service for only one type of disease. Maybe it just saves them time, maybe it'better for them to contract the work externally than use the time of their own staff. End of the day, none of the speculation matters, it's only about 200k extra, on a company that is behind all it's peers, who do drug design and modelling for loads of drugs. That's why it's done next to no revenue all it's life, never been in profit, has to survive on grants.

Remind me what price the last 3 rns's took the price to? Just so people can be aware what kind of profit people can make?

..so long that their original TEN YEAR patents have now expired. The share pricequickly got down to normal levels of 10p and dropping. Hence why the share struggles to hold above 7p now. So there you have it, back in 2014 major pharma named, 8p and dropping, other clients in the same year in a normal course of business. Now in 2018 you have the same client spending some more money, other clients in the same year as a normal course of business, similar share price. Anyone quoting astronomical share prices has nothing to back it up with.

Previously you had pyc disclosing Merck's revenues were equal to 2013/2014 total revenues, so they are spending a little more now. The reason it went to about 17, then 12p in 24 hours, is based on people chatting utter nonsense about 'being a cure for cancer, life changing tech' when they weren't aware what pyc did, just dosage modelling for trials, and have been doing this for years, so long

Hold, on you just said it was never mentioned as a partner, now you're agreeing with me. How much was priced in, all of it, and the price was dropping too. No one really cared because all that matters is revenues. And you've had two placings since. Oh and it's not worth '500k min per annum'. It said quite clearly they don't expect it to be any more than 500k, there is NO fixed term and can't guarantee if any future revenues will be the same. That's what is written in black and white in the price movement rns. So that doesn't say '500k min per annum' at all....it says '500k for one year, no guarantees of anymore or the same'. And so what they have a few extra contracts on top of it, they had a few extra contracts added back in 2014, 15, 16, this is called DOING BUSINESS. You sound 'surprised' they have customers. They also lose customers too, as by their comments of 'try to reconnect with previous customers'. The current position today is pretty much no different to any position in the last 3 years, a bit more money on the cards, but still less revenues than your local pub.

And so what they have a few extra contracts on top of it, they had a few extra contracts added back in 2014, 15, 16, this is called DOING BUSINESS. You sound 'surprised' they have customers. They also lose customers too, as by their comments of 'try to reconnect with previous customers'. The current position today is pretty much no different to any position in the last 3 years, a bit more money on the cards, but still less revenues than your local pub.