Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Andrew is accumulating shares ?? Don't know what you mean there. If you mean Andyken, then I doubt he is accumulating shares? He wants shareholders to add there holdings to a personal legal action against the BOD. Companies might well be doing DD. Just maybe not the big ones, then again they might be, who knows, still all up in the air.
Captain, I only replied because someone posted " No idea what this is , one they made earlier" rgds Ranger lightbench machine. Obviously not as well researched as they thought then. Just thought I would enlighten to them. I'm only posting to catch the attention of billionaires that read this BB. Lol
Ranger is great technology and gaining traction by the day. What he's basically saying is that Ranger can extract much more info from a much smaller sample size and quicker than anything out there today. It has the ability to quickly sort the wheat from the chaff so to speak and discard all the unimportant stuff they don't need in any sample analysis.
Very cost effective , for example now when a Nipt blood sample is taken it has to go into a special glass ( streck) tube.
They usually use two of these glass tubes at around $9/10 each for each individual sample.
Using Ranger tech, these blood samples can now use a EDTA plastic tube, which cost around $1 each and you only need one I believe.
So that's a saving of around $18/19 for every sample using Ranger and EDTA tubes.
Some of these labs do upwards of 100k + samples per year. So quite some savings in test tubes alone.
On top of that it's more accurate too.
There are other advantages , but it might be better to look on Ygens website to get a fuller picture.
This tech is unique to Ygen.
I think many will wait a little longer to see if anyone else offers. Still a couple of weeks yet. In any case when push comes to shove majority will go with it imo, no alternative. There were a few irate pi that having previously said they would vote it down, have now said they will vote for it.
I expect the ii will do the same as they can't play the spite game. Their shareholders won't be happy if they did that .
"Working for shareholders and being sincere".. ha ha!
We should all support Andrew regardless. It won't affect anything as it's at a personal level I believe. Just what he deserves imo.
Not a chance Rees is looking. He's got the deal he wants, end of. Should be locked up imo.
At least it has been verified by independent others like Labcorp and LaVal uni. Couldn't otherwise believe a word if coming from Rees alone.
If what we are led to believe is true with Ranger then yes, it could well be valuable.