Member Info for Daisydog

..Phoenix........its just a coincidence that you're the second person to plug FAR on this board today... ...of course it is.
Endion: superb analysis.

Whoah SF. I think a post in the middle which accounts for it all has been deleted. Someone called L2 analyst posted pumping FAR. It has been removed prob as off topic.

And BMN producing meaningful quantities right now rather than having to look for funding.....

Knuttie. I've been saying it too for many months now. But in my view, the time to make what would be a hostile bid is running out. If there are signed contracts for electrolyte shortly, then the SP will rerate despite millions of subsidised sells. So, I cant see us having to wait much longer if it is this that is holding the SP down.

Yes, if only BE can get a first commercially workable deal to supply VRFBs finally signed up. Mikhail's disclosure about "100s of discussions" currently looking a risky one as it implies that no-one actually bit after the initial nibble. He needs to change that pronto.

Cowboy. No. I would not. Director buys a notable absence here . No one topped up their holding even when down to 8p.

Vametco 652. Vanchem 219. Total Q1 871. 219÷ 871 = 25.1%. Where am I making the mistake!

Pdub.I have read it and I had compared it with previous RNSs. And this was why I dont feel it's as strong an RNS as some do.
Eg. From Q2 2018 Aug 2018 Phase Two of the Vametco expansion project, comprising the commissioning of the third primary mill and secondary crusher, was successfully completed within budget and on time. This phase of the expansion project increases annualised production capacity to 3,750 mtV, from 3,035 mtV achieved in Phase One, which was completed in Q3 2017. We expect to see gradual increases in output over the course of H2 2018 as the operation ramps-up to the 3,750 mtV rate.
So. My maths says that despite these upgrades that were supposed to take from a then current 3035 to 3750, we are still at 2608 although we lost 7 days production in lockdown. I found this disappointing. Have I misunderstood? My comment about news related to the other areas that you know I think have been lacking.

...but at a MCAP of £134m we are valued way below our assets.....

I see this as red today. The Q1 update to 31.March only contained 1 week of lockdown as SA went in on 23rd. Q2 already 5 weeks down. So, an RNS confirming survival through CV but not a great one. And still no news on anything of real significance.

Hope its warm and secluded where you are....

Only undone by Shell recently setting 2050 to be carbon neutral. Ambitious....not!

James, I've very nearly reached your conclusion too. My belief in VRFB becoming a commercially successful application has taken an enormous hit. And a lot of the rethink ( nearly all) relates to appalling communication which I have whined about for a year or two now.

...but no information about any aspect of the company's activities virtually since the turn of the year. .....

Bobby. None of my friends in USA concur when I put this to them fact or fiction.

Might email CEO!

Despite my continued support for VRFB, unfortunately the take up of this as a technology seems very variable. Subsea have just won a multi 100 million pound contract for wind energy. Their website doesn't even reference battery technology let alone VRFB. They are proceeding with hydro pneumatic storage. Disappointing.

I have only experience of one AIM co. going to joint listing. MARL went to TSE. Didn't make much / any difference though. Anyone got more positive experiences?

M'man: the date for Q1 2019 release was 15 May 19. No guarantee it will come tomorrow. Fingers crossed though. We need something to get us back to the dizzy heights of 15p......... (raised eyes emoji!)

...no need....!!