George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
https://tech.co/mapping-driverless-car-crash-california-2018-10#.XALxt7b1tvs.twitter
Rankings have dramatically changed again and now app is higher at 523, bear in mind there are 5 fertility apps in health and fitness in top 50 of that category, three in top 20 so it's an important metric.
The android app is now listed on app annie but no data yet, so well just have to see where this goes, I emailed them but their site bounced so getting info is problematic, not exactly accessible
How is banning phones outright logical? Would you ban people talking in a car? You need to be reasonable, better integration of phones into car entertainment etc to make it less cumbersome to use, but that's about all you should do imo
The gardener analogy is very good, but manufacturing issues aside if there are technical issues it matters it matters differently in different environs, take the example of that German pilot who deliberately crashed the plane I presume airlines would be looking for sophisticated cues over time to weed out as well as develop competent pilots that'll be more expensive than metrics you need on a car, you dont always go for the cheaper gardner who works quickly or misses things a park is different from Anfield is different from royal botanical, dont forget we are fine tuning and learning from all this evaluation they are our learning base, we are still in the middle of evaluation, news about rail governance evaluating our tech is pretty high profile just a waiting game, deeply frustrating none the less though
Interestingly involvement of companies like Thales means that Boeing, BAE and others would buy this tech because its central they all get that now, you control and monitor the human factor, professionalism can now be directly assessed at the coal face, military applications are obvious planes, but tanks etc, SEE are working with air traffic control which involves military it's a big deal, of course if were working with RAAF expect evaluations, collaboration with NATO members Japan etc, at least our tech is first class, behavioural comments in last RNS says we are doing more than just fatigue
Interestingly involvement of companies like Thales means that Boeing, BAE and others would buy this tech because its central they all get that now, you control and monitor the human factor, professionalism can now be directly assessed at the coal face, military applications are obvious planes, but tanks etc, SEE are working with air traffic control which involves military it's a big deal, of course if were working with RAAF expect evaluations, collaboration with NATO members Japan etc, at least our tech is first class, behavioural comments in last RNS says we are doing more than just fatigue
Just when you get all misty eyed and start to pay attention to ads of things you cant afford now but will be able to when SEE share price makes you millions, something like this comes along to remind you competition is fierce and share price languishes for reasons already given, lucky it's a big market though thales are massive and i can see them buying them on the cheap and through sheer financial/technical muscle taking this to forward in ways that will make me cry into that stella
:) lol, I took it as obvious that more die per plane and planes are more expensive plus the whole flying in the sky thing but given there are more cars about I was just surprised the difference was 3-4 times in the legal limit, is driving 3-4 times safer? why is any alcohol level permissible those levels are based on population averages, there are differences in sex and race and other factors in terms of alcohol tolerance
Does anyone know why legal limit for driving with alcohol is 35g/L but flying 9g/L? A coach full of 50 people driving through London would be just as dangerous I would have thought...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/11/29/drunk-japanese-pilot-attempted-fly-passenger-jet-heathrow-caught/
ASLEF are not luddites but they know in their bones that this tech will demonstrate some indefensible unprofessional behaviour that will be used to target people felt to be poor performers based on the job they actually do and the video evidence will require little to no legal debate, especially when sacking older higher paid ones for younger cheaper and more quickly trained drivers
No shandy for me but I've been drifting in and out of sleep with flu so that might be it,seeing I take your point and agree with it and I'm not trying to down the share but the problem is other people dont see that yet and potential is not enough to sustain a share price so while I'm not expecting to drop to 1p we wont be seeing 7 let alone 14 until more substantial rns come through, the point about 2009 is that we are not immune to wider market realities as Facebook, apple etc clearly demonstrate, the people that invest in them will be investing in us one day, we are all holding on for the day we can sell to them at substantial gain, yes?
On a positive note If we could get the verge or wired or mashable do a piece on our tech in aviation with references to Cadillac and some nice scientific info good photos of tech and team and the chip covering its history as a startup to where we are now that would be good visibility for SEE
In 2009 the lowest price was 1.13p, in September last year, so ok 14 months as go, the lowest was 3p, my point is the same that until we can demonstrate serious earning this share price will languish because there are many players in the field which is new and people with money will not start to invest heavily in this until it is proven we are bringing in the earnings as opposed to other players, which for them they cant see a difference between to decide who to invest in to ensure a return for their shareholders, customers etc, even though we know different
At the height of the financial crisis SEE fell to 1p, this time last year it was 3p, its relative to market conditions and conditional on earnings which while potentially great have yet to be realised, do you wait till it drops further and pick up more shares, risky if blows, do you buy more now...expensive if it falls further.....what to do...what to do....