RE: this board !6 Nov 2022 09:53
We’re all interested in share prices. As far as I know, Mr. Day has never been pressed on that specifically. And probably may not want to comment. One can but read into his more off the cuff remarks, taken from Dip’s notes, thankyou.
“And look, you know we, we still feel we're a little bit vulnerable to Newcrest. You know it's a pretty brutal stock market out there. You know, typically, you know, we're not really happy that we get the right value for our stock and look, when I think about the ASX, I should probably add, you know, we… right now we feel, you know, maybe on the ASX we trade a little bit higher.
And again, that hopefully encourages some ASX shareholders to say well yeah let's, you know, let's move on and up to the LSE and pick up some of the stock because it compares favourably on fundamentals right now which I think is helpful.”
Though it’s not plain what the Newcrest vulnerability may amount to, it’s easy to see it comes into the thinking when you’re not the sole master of your own destiny in particular decisions. But, you know, I think things are likely to proceed on economic grounds.
In an earlier post it was said that Mr. Day suggested Ncm ‘had a takeover challenge.’ It may have been said somewhere previously? And not arguing the point, because I don’t know - depends how you view ‘vulnerability’ I suppose on this last occasion.
On takeovers, nobody would want to see Newcrest try to pull the rug from under Ggp, on Havieron, in some mysterious way. Personally, I think that’s receding since Wyloo involvement, and should Wyloo make a bid, maybe at some stage, then that with a 40% say premium might normally be welcomed by many shareholders, dependent upon when they bought in. Possibility of a bidding war as it would quickly be touted.
Just a suggestion on all this. Mr.Day is a company man. He has to be. His interest must lie in the best interests of the company entity, access to capital etc., to promote it’s growth, or that of it’s assets.