Member Info for Culpepper

Haha. About time people cottoned on to me! Got it now. Thanks.
Alright. Back later, Carry on.

No. This board always so called ‘calling people out.’ Giving them fair opportunity to do it to me.
Yes. I shall give it a rest. Said my piece. Now it’s up to others to put up or not.
How’s that?

Benefit of doubt? I’m happy to go to trial. My suggestion of a new thread allows that. It’s only anonymous words, can’t be in any way personal, but it’s what we got. Isn’t it?

You know, like the main board as it’s called, where you are expected to evidence what you say.

What’s this ‘ subtle posts about time’. Crikey. Tell you what, you must have researched my posting history. All bb supremos do.
Put them up, why don’t you. As far as I know, the timescales are as inicated by various parties, not me.
Tell you what. For every bodies ease, and mine, start a new thread with my name at the top, and then you can have an evidenced go. And it will save others having to read it.
And then if that’s done, I can come back end of day and respond - if I think it’s right.

You endow me with strengths I do not possess. As does H ( well, you would expect me to read it, and I did )
A paid person subverting the market through this medium to enable the big boys to buy in cheaply, and in the end I think, though it’s not clear to me, that some big buys went through indicating my success.
Well, I ask you……

So what’s all the fuss about? I’m plainly on the production side with Ncm as partners. Nobody here can prevent or make events happen there.
To what nonsense do you refer, that I spread to the relative few on here. The very much minority of investors, as you see from the share price. I wish it was otherwise. I anticipated being ahead of the placing price by now, as I have said.

Things can and do change. But only normally for good reason. And in the business world, particularly so. It’s all about the money.
Reading this today, purely some of the posts, it’s as though there is doubting of own investments creeping in again, with a case being made for processing at Telfer.
Really need to focus, if you want, on the forthcoming study. We won’t know til we get it, but that is where the value willl lie, giving rise to action which flows from it.
I mean, is this a half tidy mine looking at production, millions of profit as anticipated, or holes in the ground nobody wants. Take your pick.

Tell me please, is all this about Telfer to suggest Ncm will not ‘permit’ Ggp to process it’s. ore there alongside Ncm’s? I should think it’s part of the discussions at least when the JV started, in fact it will have been. It’s been repeatedly mentioned in presentations/reports from both sides, Biswas says that is what will happen. Or is doubt once more being cast upon Biswas’ ability to make a business decision, or Mr. Day’s ability and that of his board to have an inside handle on things?

Simon Hunt
15 September 2022

A scramble for DIY home insulation products has helped Wickes reach record sales as Brits rush to improve their home’s efficiency in a bid to cut down on steep energy bills.
The Northampton-based firm said it saw an 85% rise in home insulation products compared to pre-pandemic norms as it reaffirmed its profits forecast despite warning of a softening of demand in the DIY market.
Wickes CEO David Wood told the Standard: “The key change we’re seeing…is this shift in volume growth in energy-efficient products – whether that be insulation, draft excluder, or LED light bulbs.

“We have the oldest and most inefficient housing stock in Europe. The penny’s dropped now with [DIY] customers that they need to think and behave differently around those projects.”

For those that actually want the old stuff, it’s here.
https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=IDE&share=Ide-Hldgs
But I do agree. I have a sense of a new beginning.

He can’t hear you,, by the way, he’s on the other board.

Well you would mayfordriver. You repost his stuff.

Seen it many times. You have too. It may be if a thread is taken out, theirs might not be. Artistry in action.

But I expect the thread will go. That’s the idea, isn’t it?

I object. ( tongue in cheek ) it was in the public domain. On there in depth, and reported on here. It should be there to look up. Unless it’s been deleted.
And you should refute my statement, in the proper way.

I think some forgotten what they are taking objection to - so here it is again.
“Ggp chat.
Some seem to have hived themselves off over there. Fair enough for their own purposes.
But looking at it, then they come here as well.
I guess any revelations will make themselves known.
Last one was when Ncm were going to rig the vote.”

Actionable. Or no case to answer?

I’m always chilled. If you read back through, it’s others who aren’t. So don’t give me that rubbish.

I put on a perfectly reasonable ( and factual )
post at 0959 and these are the responses.
Codswallop.
You’re a very ‘twitchy’ bunch, aren’t you?
And as has been pointed out, you can always use Ggp chat. If you want to. That seems why it was in part invented, to avoid ‘people like me’. The ‘other ones’ if you like.
Otherwise, there you go.

What’s misleading about it? Seems factually correct to me.