Member Info for Culpepper

Don’t fret about it. I suspect it’s highly unlikely to happen.

Perhaps the next non exec will assume responsibility for bulletin board morale, rousing songs, that sort of thing. Vera Lynn could have done it for UK investors, maybe somebody like Rolf Harris for a change down under.

Crikey. That’s maudlin-making. You can arrange your own funeral without all that.
Over a share? And sometimes they go up.
Depends what you’re sat on I suppose.

You’d think it would have been a perfect time to rise before now particularly on the various comments given on here, but it’s not. Starting to take the view it’s performed better than equities, and that may be it, with investors pricing in a lot of what I thought might drive it.
In no position to argue with anyone on what might or should happen, just on the evidence as I perceive it.

“ We are focused on executing our strategy to realise our ambitions and maximise shareholder value over the long term.”

Ggp have their plans, and reasons for them. Tasmania not part of them.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/999939/*****-gold-moves-to-add-drill-ready-gold-and-battery-metals-projects-to-tasmanian-portfolio-999939.html

Why not, in particular?
***** has a fairly wide portfolio of exploration licences.
This is another one.
Added at a time when they undoubtedly had a very sound outlook on immediate results and future plans alongside.

“upfront value and maintains a future economic interest in these projects, providing ongoing exposure to upside outcomes “

The proposed Tasmanian sale to ***** is also interesting in that it is a first, as far as I know, for Ggp in a royalty fee, a future option for Ggp tenements apparently mentioned by Mr. Day.

Pento. Thanks. I only found golfer Mento.

And whoever he is, I wonder what he got the rest in?

Out of interest. Who’s Mike Mento please?

If it came off by some chance, 100% not so bad.

Proposed bank facility was agreed at a point in time prior to extension of FS. Things change, facility may also. The RNS says the NCM loan was 'expected' to be paid from first drawdown. The banks may permit that, if not indeed already agreed as Mr. Day has indicated. If not, there is a revolving credit facility ( and. cash ) to consider, should they wish to dispose of loan earlier than draw down may permit.
I have no doubt that the bank syndicate is kept well informed by Ggp to ensure arrangements are ongoing, and with only improvement of the asset foreseen there is no reason to anticipate problems with funding - subject of course to final agreement on terms originally given in the commitment letter, or amended as a result of changes to plans.
I have given up trying to guess what NCM may, or may not, be up to, substantially wound up by this board. The asset is there - if there is profit in it it will be mined, and on the basis of what we know there is no point in delaying that profit.

https://view.news.eu.nasdaq.com/view?id=bbb96780f0661c87e58c0546cf02dee60&lang=en

https://www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/shares/microsite?Instrument=ICE273304&symbol=AMRQ&name=Amaroq%20Minerals%20Ltd.

Not done any worse since listing its African interests in Australia in Sept has it?
And Ggp would be different by having a listing in it’s country of activity - mandated institutions, publicity…..

The sooner the better then, rather than being pushed, if that is the case, presuming these are institutions having to wait to invest.

Ex Havieron.

To put things in perspective from my posting, and though I might have missed some stuff, it is the first ‘new’ news that I have read coming from a Town Hall meeting, and I suggest may prove significant ex-Telfer in relation to future potential discoveries, on which we are all waiting.