Member Info for Culpepper

Yes. Maybe running it up and down to satisfy demand either way. MM. Making a market.

Redirons “don’t add to it unless you really have to as it’s just an opinion at the end of day with nothing factual to back it up”

Of course some of it’s opinion on here when facts are in short supply. You object to my posts. What in particular? What’s your contrary opinion? With facts to back it up. Shorting and conspiracy?
You green binned me.
But just maybe for the record, somebody may be interested. Or see it all as pretty pointless.

Nothing negative in my posts. Some love the conspiracy chat. I don’t go for it myself. As with all the shorting talk. I didn’t go for that either. Green binned.
Incidentally, nothing to say somebody isn’t working up to 3%, or new directors won’t buy when able.
You lot a bit over precious I think - in response to my alleged ‘undermining.’

It’s the more obvious one, usually, isn’t it? If somebody is to help see off or make a bid from within. And they can go to 14% any time by executing their agreement for new shares, before they’re in the money.
On the wider issue of low share price, there’s nothing to prevent buyers flooding in at the same ‘advantageous’ price, and ****ing up any perceived conspiracy. But they’re not. Seems we have to wait for a catalyst, whatever that transpires to be.

Anyway, in the corporate set-up, Wyloo may be the ones to watch. Fullness of time, and all that. And they’ll disclose holdings, if they feel a need to buy.

They’re playing a long and very organised criminal conspiracy then, to subvert the markets and Ggp in particular. Perhaps old Shawn Day and his empire building board sleepwalking into a trap.

I wouldn’t be surprised if JPM and their oppos they’re working with don’t print their own to. short, whilst buying and stuffing their duvets with them.

You know, JPM or somebody hiding shares away, to facilitate bids and avoid the disclosure rules.

Could it be somebody has amassed a shareholding exceeding Wyloos without complying with transparency rules and will surprise everyone by popping up to vote a low ball offer through?

I suppose it may be possible to work out whether each entry is a buy or sell relative to preceding and succeeding prices, And then totalling shares bought and sold. But does anybody do that? Or is reliance placed on that info. published on this website, basically whether a transaction is above or below mid, blue or red.

And the price of gold? Seems to me for those hanging around here that won’t have a direct correlative effect for over a year, revenue, and a lot can happen on the exploratory and corporate fronts before then.
For me, the DTM is the next thing to put satisfactorily behind us.

Well, I consider Wyloo to know more than anyone, certainly on here.
And if it’s possible to buy in the 7’s, so much the better.
Not very scientific, I know, but I think they can do that for me.

It’s given as an off book trade.
https://www.ig.com/uk/glossary-trading-terms/off-book-definition

Still chunks being sold into the rise, but buying prevailing.

He may be well researched. But if you’re over there can you ask where his research showed him JPM still have an open short on behalf of somebody else.
They might, but where’s it come from?

And on this one, we need the free float diminishing by improving the share register.

See what I started. I got no axe to grind about JPM or anybody else. They been about for yonks, same as it’s said sometimes that gold been manipulated for yonks.
My overall assessment remains the same as all shares. Sufficient buying drives price up.

I get trading, as mentioned by Mr. Day, and one or two tricks of the trade, sure. But nothing maybe to highlight Ggp, was where I was coming from. As Mr. Day appears to think.
But I’m not making a point, don’t want to drag it out. Nothing in it for me.

I get that, boards tend to be overcome by the extremes - it’s either the mms, JPM or whatever, picking on us, or at the other end there will be a bid coming in which means either somebody is ‘picking it up cheap’ or we’ll make a fortune.
But I had thought over the quite extreme lengths of time this board had largely got beyond that.
I was enquiring because I can’t see it at all myself.

I don’t want to get into conspiracy and manipulation theories, and start arguments as over shorting, but I would like to have some idea how it’s suggested that the price is being ‘kept in check’ by those selling shares in order to acquire them.