Member Info for CrustyPete

Increases their NAV assessment marginally (from 0.10p to 0.11p) and broadly upbeat - but then they are TRP's Nomad.....

In my view, for the patient, a good time to take advantage of the lowly price. I topped up again yesterday.

GLA

If McNol's theory is correct, the reason for the "secrecy" is self evident..... though I rather hope that doesn't happen; it might put some serious money in He1 coffers but would mean that He1 return to being simply an "explorer" and no longer a "producer" though may allow us to progress Rukwa without waiting for a Farm-In partner.....

I think "initial" is more to do with a price of the Helium. Tying in short term pricing in the current Geo political climate before agreeing a longer term price once the current price "bubble" settles. If the spot price is still high in three months time (highly likely) I would not be surprised to see another interim extension. No offtake partner is likely to agree to a fixed, long term price structure based on today's inflated levels.

Https://www.middle.news/articles/2026/06/03/blue-star-helium-locks-in-short-term-us-helium-offtake-deal

A fulsome account of the deal and context.

Looks as if we need an intervention from VAR - or RNS in this instance - to provide a change in momentum ;0)

Maybe ATG they are clearing the decks for a forthcoming Cap Raise...? Expecting to buy back cheaper? Time to sit on your hands and wait for things to settle methinks.

It is a ridiculous comparison, full stop; it is both facile and simplistic. Anyone can find a time frame that suits their argument for pretty much any share. I have held this share now for over three years but with varying amounts whilst having a core holding. That core holding of several million shares I now hold with "free carry". I also hold Hex (since Minchin left) and am in profit, but certainly do not have free carry. I am looking to buy more in both shares but am awaiting the delivery of certain milestones before doing so as each of them are in total different places on their journey. So, and for multiple different reasons, to attempt to make meaningful direct comparisons is nonsensical

"ChristyPot" ?! 🤭

We must thank our lucky stars that you are here to raise the level of our puerile conversation EE.....

Thank you, oh lord and master🙏🏼

Did you mean the buyer of 200k at 25.0p at 14.38 EE? Duh...!

Unfortunate but predictable, a weak handed few sellers being tempted out of their holdings by the MM's bore close of play..... short sighted methinks.

Thank you Billy.

Also I note a small flurry of buying activity since early lunchtime; could that be ASCO generated....? It may well be an interesting afternoon.

Keep prattling on joyo - the more you speak the more you confirm what a total cretin you are.

Eaten any donkeys recently? I guess you will be telling us all that the sp will soon be 0.9p!

What an ar se ole.

Yes Watchouse he does have a few, but nothing substantial. Most of those he held upon leaving have long since been sold. At least, so he told me and that was tail end of 2022.

Joyo you are a total clown - best not to commnet on things you know absolutely nothing about nothing about.

Exactly the point broomtree - what MM squares up their book for 60p...... so what was that trade about?

91joyo, I can assure you from personal knowledge that your claim is total nonsense - Jay no longer holds any shares.

Perhaps because they have done all the "marketing" of their wares that they can, or feel the need to do? Everyone that is anyone in the States will be more than aware of their recent FDA approval and their "fast-track" status and we have already been told that Scancell BoD have been in talks with 30+ entities since as long ago as last November. Anyone joining now will be too late to the party methinks - with Phase 111 trials due to begin in H2 this year. If you are not already in the queue you are too late; all tickets pre-sold.

MM's short of shares....?

Could be an interesting close to the week.

Well perhaps if the Company were able to connect all wells drilled to date to a production facility they would be able to avoid drilling the new 4 production wells but, it seems to me, that the new transitional rules would preclude that. Therefore to optimise production from fewer wells they now have to new drill wells with bigger bores . So yes, superficially it would seem at additional cost - question being is this a forced change in plans or was this the expectation from the outset?

Yes, broadly positive but with further work to be done.

"Before commercial gas production can proceed, applicable state rulemaking, environmental review, permitting requirements and related implementation steps must be completed. On May 18, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources took a significant step in this process by issuing proposed expedited permanent rules for permitting gas resource development, such as Pulsar's Topaz Project. The Company intends to support the state's next steps by providing technical information on primary helium development, groundwater protection, well construction, gas handling, carbon dioxide management, emergency response planning and project-specific risk"

And still no separate results from J7...... peculiar?