Member Info for CrustyPete

Manifesto I do think it may be somewhat premature for us to reveal the "financial plans for commercialisation" in anything other than outline terms with the ML. Why? Well, if as we all believe the ML is approved in the next few weeks the Galactica project will still be in its infancy and I do firmly believe that they will need to progress someway further with the Galactica project before doing so; and also have a CPR in place. The Galactica development will provide them with future income streams to service any Debt funding and, only once proven up, provide an asset that can be collateralised.

Maybe a JV, well maybe but again only with a Feasibility Study, a CPR and a proportion of Debt Funding being contributed by He1 in my view - otherwise the JC partner will end up with too large a proportion of the funding requirement and therefore future income streams from Rukwa. Unless of course we fund our contribution with a Cap Raise...? And I am sure that neither any shareholder nor the Board would choose to do that if Debt Finance was available.

Yes Chesh I have just been offered the "offer" price of 1.05p for 4 million shares.

Thanks McNol, So complete by 9:00 here. That's interesting and useful.

SHERRATI, excuse my ignorance but I am assuming those scheduled times are Tanzanian time? Anyone know what the time difference is between GMT and Tanzanian time zone(s)?

Similar Manifesto on II I get 1.0375 versus 1.0485 for 4 million shares.

Good gracious me so email you are making your assertions based on what exactly? Zero information by any chance? have you actually done any research, followed any RNS's, listened to any interviews? If you have then you would know where and who said so and when. But, self evidently you don't. So sorry but excuse me when I give your baseless, vacuous and totally unsubstantiated assertions no credence whatsoever.....

Good volume today for a change. Let's hope it bodes well and is not based on the expectation of the ML approval before or at the Conference, because if so it could very quickly evaporate.

Actually that response does not indicate why you think that is better than the previous timings/ expectations but hey, never mind.

Enjoy your holiday.

Sorry missed that - will do.

It is now back in the "blue" roses, so fingers crossed that it stays there. Happy with my two small top up below 14.0p

"(overall positive)"? Really EE, how so? That seems a fairly generous interpretation.

A "campaign"? I think that piece is a factual and balanced account - less about funding and more about delays; and those cannot be denied. Of course those delays do cause funding questions to be asked. Even Panmure Liberum stated "also note that Scancell will need to raise funds in order to advance through the clinical trial process."

Whilst we have heard from the BoD that options are available and that funding is not considered a concern, until the details are known and confirmed the "uncertainty" that I consistently refer to will remain and will be to the detriment of the sp.

So it is hardly a surprise that journalists have picked up on this.

Phew! It seems to have bottomed out.

I hope its not just a dead cat bounce 😋

It is about uncertainty and timelines in my view, so I sympathise with those selling. Where will the fall stop? I can't claim to know but, whilst it feels a bit like catching a falling knife I have just started adding again (hence back to BUY from HOLD). These look like good prices after a 25% fall from 18p yesterday and we haven't seen prices below these levels since July. Though I still have a little more in reserve in case the slide does continue.

Have you ever thought that they might be one and the same?

Well come what may Elegance - though your original 1.7bn was not forward sold as you suggested, as much of that, indeed, 1.25bn of it was traded after the RNS. If you add only trades before the RNS that figure barely totals 1bn over the preceding 6 weeks and that includes both Buys and Sells.

But no matter. Good luck to us all.

Anyway, enough of this.

Good night all.

Yes RJ and from the man who decried "speculation" and only posted facts! And now "pushing the positive aspects" by speculating in the extreme with suggestions that are not quite totally but highly unrealistic for an company without any capital, no income and an obligation to revive the fortunes of the only asset they still have "operational" control over, namely Kiliwani. Operational control and yet no operational ability .

ARA yes, AEX no. Not unless ARA fancy offering AEX 25% free carry for "old time's sake".... And unfortunately I don't have shares in ARA but AEX.

Predictable? Really? Then just a pity that if you were so good at predictions you did not forewarn us all of 6 months of crippling inactivity and a 40% fall in the sp.

So come on then Einstein, rather than try and laugh of my observations why not show us all how clever you are and provide an answer to them? So you think AEX can purchase a license, pay for it and then demonstrate that they can meet their obligations as a license holder? Enlighten us.

Now that really is worthy of a LOL!

Just goes to prove that you can change your name SC but mctripe still lingers. 😆