Holding on2 Nov 2019 19:53
Yes. Totally SKnight. Massive discount to NAV ( risked at 32p WH Unrisked 40p Cenkos) . The time to buy a solidly financially robust company with such discount is when it is out of favour. I know of one poster on LSE who used low-sentiment and discount to NAV together with low or no debt in several companies as to become very rich.
Re. political pressure regime off buyers?
Not necessarily. It’s the reason the price is so low in the first place and Trin have all but mitigated the nasty sting of SPT by scada/ future Haws/ ( to increase cheap onshore bopd) /hedging below $56 -$50/ no creditors. Their main failure is their incredibly stubborn unwillingness to acknowledge the necessity for consistent PR ( sadly necessary) and information flow which feeds the market. Almost to the point of secrecy. As a business they have done everything right.
But should value common or garden shareholders more . Many like me are very far from wealthy indeed and many have exited of late because of this.
A dividend IS feasible and would make Trin a more credible investment. That’s the only reason I would want it .
Strong cash balance and no debt. TGAL is an incredible 2c asset just waiting for taxes to allow instigation.
No matter what drivel I might come out with ( no you don’t need to agree)....
9p at this debt-free NAV is a once in a lifetime. If anyone is still here in 2 yrs when directors incentive plan matures.......well....no looking back for those who exited. Ridiculous superhuman patience needed for some shares but who’s gonna regret it then?otherwise