RE: Agm15 Dec 2020 18:57
Just catching up on what has been said on here.
Chriszzr yes was in contact last year, made the effort to have a two hour meeting, but have not had contact recently and to be honest it served no purpose in the end. None of the things, to my knowledge, discussed have been completed. I could be in the wrong and they were right, and there is a part of me I hope they are, but 20 months later, would be like constantly calling tails when its heads but at some point you get it right and then take credit where credit is no longer due. Is it enough to say let bygones be bygones? Not when it has had immense impact on your life, no chance! There is a lot I could say but its history now, and we all move on.
Been reading the posts tonight with interest. Not checked in since the weekend and to be honest I see the frustration and feel it being a holder too. I do not see the benefit of calling for an AGM at this late stage unless there is solid proof that those in trust have done something underhand. They are not about to risk their entire careers, and know very well that having their names attached to anything like that, would be a PR disaster par excellence, when trying to negotiate deals in the future.
Imagine if it was you, and you had a successful career, and were dealing at a top level, and then your name is constantly connected to being in a poster’s opinion a lazy bone idle bum who is a freeloader and cares nothing for the shareholders. Imagine potential business people who you are dealing with reading that? Once is one too many, but if it comes up over and over, the potential of doing business diminishes quickly. You have been tainted and puts doubt in potential business peoples mind, and it will be an effort to get that cleared up. The only way would be to deal with those posters. So Neilin is correct – be careful what you say, even me, at this late stage no matter how much it hurts. When you deal in millions you want to make sure all bases are covered and the people you deal with are checked and checked again to make sure they are fit for the job.
So soon we will know who the joker in the pack was, directors? Other side? Or as usual the paper mad, pen pushing, jobworthys in the middle?
I decline with respect to all.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
