RE: 2025 Q114 May 2025 18:34
HeinzM,
You are correct that a higher expected return discounted at 7% which is then converted into a cash return with an IRR of 40%+ will involve plusses and minuses that might balance out at point of realisation. Say we had invested £10m in a case expected to realise a 25% return in 2 years (£15.6m), then the fair value calculation at the start would give £13.6m. You give yourself a 40% IRR settled after 7.5 months and receive £12.4m by which time the fair value has increased to £14.2m, illustrating how it is possible to generate a fair value loss of £1.8m. Here the valuation is recast at the point of deployment. We "instantly" make £3.6m and another £0.6m of "unwind of discount" but then give up £1.8m for a quick settlement.
However the accounting works, there has to be a point at which we generate the value, which will be a combination of "at deployment", "judicial milestone revaluations" or "settlement". Those are the activities of Burford that generate value and the unwind of interest is can be seen as a sort of minimum threshold to surpass in order to be generating true value. It's why the $1m modelling figure looks a little disappointing even if they are recycling investments faster with a higher IRR but lower ROIC.
Fwiw, I don't measure this company on quarterly performance. But the key here is growing the fair valuation calculation which is 6.7%(?) unwind plus investment/legal performance. Fair value is only low if performance generates a higher return.