Member Info for Compo62

Great! Now, don't let the door hit your ar*e on the way out, there's a good chap!

Don't forget to pop back in May 24 to rub our noses in it, AimH - looking forward to it!

Nope! PREM didn't breach 1p. Sending a few scouts over the front line isn't a breach. 😉 Happy weekend all!

Probably settles the debate about which will breach 1p first, though!

Thanks to Lav and Daz for the background on the long stop dates - happy to NOT blame BA if the date is missed. Have always been happy to wait, anyway!

OK... "happy"... I will definitely be relieved to see an RNS, either way

Fwiw, of what I hold, I think HUM, ALL, UFO have good and relatively imminent potential

It was an off book trade

There's a rooftop bar over the road from Victoria station - but nothing very fancy about it!

Not sure how to put this... Look... IF the end May long stop date is missed, one excuse that for me holds no water is - "this is our first time doing this in Mali so how were we to know?" - like saying "you can't expect us to be as smart as those experts posting on the LSE Share Chat board" - WHAAAT?!!! Both companies have access to all the local and international mining/commercial/political expertise they could possibly need.

Maybe II's don't see things in the same same was as a fingers-burned AIM PI but the last thing I want to see is Kodal sinking to the level of "kick the can down the road" outfits like KEFI. If you say it will all be done by the end of May, get it the f*ck done!

There are two strategies when setting a deadline - under promise/over deliver or "put yourself on a burning stage"

One would hope, as has been covered here already, that with investor confidence in mind the former would be the preferred option. And I am sure it would be, unless Hainan exerted pressure to commit to a stretch target.

If Bernie has fallen into the "creeping death" bear trap I would be very surprised. Like you, I hope and expect that a one month delay was more than enough to take care of what remained of the unfulfilled requirements

It's a relatively small number of shares, anyway.

Jeez! I came here from ADVFN because I thought there would be intelligent analysis of the stock I am invested in. Instead it has turned into gammons vs. zombies. I am sorry that I contributed to it but can we please get back to KOD? Some of this is unreadable!

we don't fail to invest in green technology; we fail to invest in all technology. starting with thatcher, exacerbated by blair and willfully ignored by the utter **** show of pms since, we have allowed (encouraged) the economy to become over reliant on the service sector.

blaming immigration is nonsensical and just opportunistic tribal politics that doesn't belong on a serious stock market forum imho.

Never mind! We can always make up for it by opening doors for each other!

Lol Daz - no stamina! ;-)

Will there be two or three teasers or will they release the tension in one gushing RNS?

The psychological element is fascinating. "Resolve" is absolutely the right word! Mine was nearly broken a couple of weeks ago because of the surge from .4 into the .8s. The day before the sp hi .92 I put in a limit sale for .885 which didn´t get triggered. That evening I cancelled it - and am happy I did.

Traders might be baffled... "But you could have bought them back at .75". Yes, I could.. but WOULD I have? It is one thing to hold your nerve whilst a single position makes up 30% of your portfolio, but another to willingly reinstate that situation. So, probably not!

I am neither lucky enough nor a good enough a researcher to have a portfolio of winners. I need to hang on to the winners I do have if I want to offset the losers AND come out on top overall.

No worries, Laverda... and I agree. I am very much in the buy and hold camp.

Paul - If I thought 0.4p was likely I would have sold out.

Understood Laverda. My point is that the sp isn´t going to meander up towards 1p and hit some arbitrary resistance there. The situation is more binary than that. We don´t know which tasks remain to be completed. But they are admin, albeit anything but simple. I didn´t mean to imply that they are.

"Struggle to break 1p" seems nonsensical to me. The funding has been delayed due to failure to complete some administrative tasks in time, presumably transfer of assets. If those tasks for whatever reason are not completed we will struggle to remain above 0.4p. If and when they are, 1p should be blown away in short order. I don´t see any scenario where we are struggling to break 1p