RE: Matts mates6 Feb 2022 15:54
Mr Dan190 I don’t think we will get that much to be honest but even if 400p say, as I have said before, all big holders roll into private business and the cheque size required for them is much smaller than you would think; as you helpfully highlight.
However if it is a lower take private price the danger is a trade buyer spoils the party and trumps it. If 400p, say, is recommendable it would be very hard and embarrassing / impossible for the independent directors to reject 500p+ from a global name.
More likely is the much debated divisional spin off of beauty or nutrition or both to trade / global mega cap and 10 year ingenuity contract. A VERY big buy back to follow thus even further enhancing those shareholdings as you set out helpfully - assuming whitewash rules allow. At least with all this pain and distraction there will on this scenario be a decent benefit to the big holders in a larger % ownership. I think that will be a more palatable structure as not sure those big holders really want to write further big cheques and roll into a take private. It will then be down to the smaller holders to decide what level you want to sell, OR NOT sell ! Either way on this scenario, the price elegantly goes back probably very very quickly to 500p +. This scenario removes the danger of a take private that is trumped and where the board loses control. Why take the risk.