RE: Exec pay21 Sep 2018 17:58
Yes, indeed. It demonstrated a master plan which worked for some but a public forum is not the place to make detailed comments.A Sports Company had been bought but needed capital to grow. Cue, the demerger and the subsequent growth of SiS and the stagnation of PXS.
In June 2013, this is the ultimatum we were given:
"If the Demerger is not approved by Provexis Shareholders the Board will be limited in its ability to implement the strategies of both the Provexis Business and the Science in Sport Business. Further, the Company would quickly be forced to seek further finance, most likely through the Provexis Group's existing equity draw down facility with Darwin or through an equity fundraising with existing Provexis Shareholders, albeit, that such funds realised may be insufficient to meet the on-going working capital requirements of the Company. The Board believe either of these fundraising routes, even if they raised sufficient funds to meet the working capital requirements of the Company, would diminish the value of the Provexis Group. Accordingly, the Directors unanimously recommend that Provexis Shareholders vote in favour of the Resolutions."
In other words, agree my plan or the Company will be finished.
On reflection,maybe we should have sold up, refused the plan and let the Company and the vanity project go to the wall. We would all be a lot better off, that's for sure.
Over 5 years later, PXS has clearly been the loser from the deal.