Member Info for Codejunkie

Agree FB.

Well i can't remember half the bulk that you've spouted.

But now you admit your a fud spouting ar.se not Mr nice guy.

You're actually full of crap and think you're not, which is hilarious

Coffecups

Considering the sh1.te that you have spouted on this BB, you don't get to play Mr Innocent.

Get back in your box

You're all making out its something bad...no one even knows what the deal is, just making crap up summising what will happen.
You all say only RNS'd information can be believed. Well, it just says spun out. so that 's it. End of conversation

Why are you all creating this crap. You have no idea what the deal will be, so you'll have to wait and see.

Cofffeecups, calamari et al, you're just a bunch of FUDers. Clearly short and thinking that this will make any difference.

You've all bee saying for months that BE does nothing, so how come you suddenly think its worth SOMETHING?

Amazing isn't it, how you fixate on something that people know little about, in fact probably a lot of investors don't even know BE exists..., and try and create a situation that doesn't exist yet.

bunch of t.wa.ts

Its prrobably because for the govt to be seeing to back BMN, they need to be seen as a junior miner rather than a company that provides Battery storage. it is probably viewed as a conflict when there is a tender process for battery storage.
BMN will be seen as providing a home mined commodity rather than having to import - plus providing jobs and tax income

I'd say they are not bad at all

if this was people offloading it would just be in chunks. This is a batch of short selling taking out bid levels.....

Wouldn't surprise me if it has a whiff of Winifrith

Some great research and explanation.

Wayyyyy above my head but thanks for sharing

Wow, Credibility straight down the tubes. First post and its B.0ll.0cks

@pdub...agree :-)

I'm not arsed about final results from a profit point of view. I want to know what's actually has been put in place, where it's going and what we are currently making on sales. We are all guessing because this is being kept under wraps.

Why withdraw lamps. It's a debate. Not an arguement.

Up until proven Pdub. There is no performance. Groundwork yes. Performance....not so much.

Pdub

Just saying it as I see. I have no doubt in them for developing the company, but you're paid for actions and results and, being fair, it has not shown yet. So asking for bonuses etc when they have left people dangling for a couple of years is not really on.
It will turn around,I have no doubt or I would have sold out at a loss and moved on. But you can't expect extra renumeration for something that you can't show results for.

for me, when tis moves reasonably, they can have all the money they want. Not arsed. But as it stands,they can get the same as last year until that happens.

Dimmed Lamp seem to think I wanted board changes. I'm not in that camp. FM is central to this company and its future but he can't expect extra cash when he has been paid and the results are not there yet.
PR is shocking(until this week - it has improved slightly). You can't run a company without broadcasting your achievements or progress - people think that there is no progress and bail. this has been our problem. people bail chasing money elsewhere. I've been sat here for three years - far less than most - because I'm involved in VRFB and know where its going..its just time.
Unlike our friend, dimmable lamp, I have real experience with VRFB - using Scmid product - and know how good and the real benefits. I also understand to some degree how the the mining industry works so I know how slow things move and how the market sometimes undervalues juniors. They also do no t understand mining companies who morph , like BMN has done.

My point is. In the real world if you don't produce results or proof of working towards progress, you don't get bonuses. We all live in the real world - even if its dimmable

Putting it a different way. if you went to work and you're working on a project, then you ask you employer for a payrise - and they asked, what have you done to deserve the payrise. if you answered them, ' I can't tell you yet, but you'll see in 3 months' - what do you think their answer would be? 'thats ok, here's a 10k payrise'?
Don't think so. They would want to see results and proof that what you are working on is going to bring in revenue....

If you can't see the similarity, your dimmer is down to 10%

Did you actually read what I said correctly? clearly not. Lamps. But it would appear that your lamp is not lit.

I said FM & the board are the correct people to make this work, but in the times when they have overstated guidance and missed deadlines they have been taking wages based on being an up to speed company, when in reality its not yet. And...again they could have kept the SP at a reasonabe level by keeping shareholders informed. They are actually lucky that someone hasnt come in and done an predatory takeover at the price its at...at which point you would be complaining because you'd be stuffed as well - even if someone paid 300pc for the company its not even close to what its worth - And with the amount of shareholding changing hands in the last few months that could have been a possibility.

If FM was forced out, I would sell, I said this before. He is the man to get this company where it should be but they have been taking wages as if it was cooking on gas, so to speak. and it hasn't been.
The company has more than most and is in a position to do extremely well and I hope it does because I have a chunk in here , but that doesn't change my view on renumeration. It's all been kept far too much in the dark.
Sitting there creating a company whilst the wider market knows absolutely nothing about it makes absolutely no sense - you're spending money with no return because no one knows about it.

I don't want board changes,I want procedure changes and them to take bonuses when the fruits of the work are on display. Until then, they shouldn't be taking wage increases or bonuses as cash or shares.

Maybe just your lamp is a bit dim,if you don't understand that

Never said it wouldn't come good. I'm just saying conduct over the last year had been crap.
I'm not ****ging off my investment. I'm just saying i won't be voting for the renumeration.
When this gets moving happy to do so.

If someone ousted the board, i would sell, because i believe the board the right people but i think that they have been paid for past achievements, not current.

If you disagree. That's fine. But you calling someone for their opinion just says everything. You've a right to yours and I can have mine. You vote for renumeration and i won't. It's called democracy. Maybe you've heard of it?

****ging people off for their opinion is just not very bright. I'm not deramping, I'm not tamping I'm just saying I think their renumeration package is adequate until this gets itself back into order.
If that's next week, I'll change my mind. Because that's my right as is yours to vote as you wish.

If you want to rant because someone doesn't agree with you, them maybe investing isnt for you

Have a great weekend all. Good rise today. Long may it continue

Dunno

He's a green box

@Pdub. Right, I get all that and yes thats true. However, Sitting in silence whilst your SP gets battered is notthe way to run a public company. I don't need info every week or month, but f**k me they really know what silence is.

And before you give me a going over. I think FM is the man for the job - I think he knows the routes through the politics and th epeople and knows what the deal is. However, when you run a public company you have a duty to keep your holders up to date.
Yes they have done loads, but its all on the down low. and that is, frankly....well b.0ll.ocks.

If they want wages to suit the stature of the company then they need to run it like a proper company....My opinion..