Member Info for CloudyMountain

This thread is dedicated to the financial guru @poorinvester, so that we can learn from his comments.

Here’s a quote from his opening comment on a thread he started on 13/4/23. The title he proudly gave it: “I’m in heavy now”!!

He wrote:

“..:This is the best punt on LSE at the moment. You can tell by some of the posters, they are getting real desperate now. I made very good money out of cine twice, let’s see if it’s going to be third time lucky for me lol.”

The SP automatically recorded at the time of his comment was 0.8235p. It’s now 0.37p. He can be proud of losing 45% of his money in a mere 2.5 months. Now that’s what I call a loser.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=CINE&share=Cineworld&thread=C1BE18A0-444A-40A6-B6B3-6DBEE9BB981E&page=2

“With a 90% success rate….”

Hexam, I should ’ve said I was replying to your post.

Poorinvester is Googling “Warren Buffett”.

With a 90% success rate, @poorinvester would be snapped up by the City and be more successful than anyone there.

Good God this guy is dim. His insecurity is almost tangible.

@poorinvester.

Of course you are, Billy BS, of course you are.

“When I buy a share, I can say it confidently I will make money from it. 90 percent confidently.”

Yet further evidence that @poorinvester:

1. Hasn’t got a clue.

2. Is full of it.

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence would never write the above because it’s an implied admission of 1 & 2. I wonder what that tells us about Billy BS’s intellect.

@poorinvester - “I’ve made money in this on most drops, let’s see if I do the same again”.

That made me laugh. Self-awareness is not one of your strengths.

You’re the fisherman always saying “You should’ve seen the one that got away”.

Plenty of people on here see straight through you.

More laughs please. Keep it up.

@poorinvester - Yeah, yeah, of course you did. Tell you what, post the proof online and give us the link to it.

Waiting…..

It’s been obvious for ages that poorinvester hasn’t got a clue. Not a clue.

Anyone who fell for his posts is likely to have paid a very heavy price, both financially and psychologically. Hopefully they’ll learn their lesson.

“I will say it again, Terry had it right. He said he closed his short at 541 when the share was at 541, and that has proved to be the bottom.”

I don’t think you understand the concept of “proof”.

BTW, I predicted this morning that it’d close today at 681 on the nose… and look what it did. It’s a gift, I tell ya!

TerryBS1: “Hopefully a few benefited”.

Such modesty!

@pictsloup,

Would you be so kind as to tell us what you did to get the dividend paid into your ISA with no deduction of the withholding tax? A lot of people on here would be very grateful.

Companies seem to reject it out of hand, without even apparently trying or apparently considering it possible.

Did you encounter initial resistance from HSBC?

Thanks.

I accidentally omitted that the relevance of the 1.47p figure is that was the price at close on 18 April, a 62% rise compared with the price at close on the previous day (0.91p)

“I didn’t think the rise was not necessarily good news…” should’ve read “I didn’t think the rise was necessarily good news…”

That was a reply to Totaltrades

CINE has fallen by 97% over the last 12 months. Wild swings are common in such shares.

As an example, under three weeks ago, on 18 April, the SP increased by 62% on the previous day’s close. Someone on here wrote a similar post to yours. I didn’t think the rise was not necessarily good news as such swings are common, they suck people in and then the SP can subsequently fall to where it started before the rise and even further. That’s precisly what happened - the SP at the time of writing is lower than it was on the day before that 62% rise, so anyone buying at 1.47 is nursing a 41% loss.

“I have to say, the winners of the numpty award are those NOT invested, yet continue to feign a saviour stance when in reality they are betting against CINE, just too cowardly to admit so.”

Wow! Just wow! Maybe the “saviours” should call a spade a spade and instead of empathising with people who have lost money, tell them that it’s their fault AND “we told you so” (because we did. Oh my God we did). Would you prefer that? And maybe rather than months ago say “I wouldn’t invest in this if I were you and here’s why”, say nothing and watch people get sucked in and lose their hard earned money - would you prefer that? Because your post is a resounding “Yes, that’s what we want. When do we want it? Now!”

I and many others walked away from here due to the verbal abuse. Since then, the SP has plummeted - as we predicted. You should have listened to us but it’s your money - and now 66+% of it is someone else’s.

I strongly suggest that you watch another discussion in the future where you believe the company is highly likely to go under - you’ll learn a lot about self-delusion and delusional optimism on the boards. If you post, you’ll be told that, as you hold no shares, you MUST be a shorter as no one would comment negatively and not be one, QED (err, if you say so). And when you deny it, you’ll be told that you’re “just too cowardly to admit” it.

As I said before, it’s like victims of 419 scams who, when told it’s a scam, will deny it and be abusive to the people warning them. OK, be my guest, we’ll watch as you burn your money and blame everyone but yourself.

We have money, you’ve lost it, and we’re the winners of the numpty award. OK, if you say so.

Not one but two of @poorinvester’s posts are no longer here (the two that I refer to in my comment at 1345 today - I said one was at 1306).

They were particularly nasty but I’d expect nothing less from him. Verbal abuse is what he does, while claiming to be the victim.

Maybe he’s in a bad mood because he’s lost so much money in CINE. But he’s like this all the time so maybe he loses money on the stock market all the time. That makes sense - he clearly doesn’t know what he’s doing while thinking he does. That’s a recipe for being eaten alive on the stock market. Oh well, what a shame, never mind.

@poorinvester - “I have announced when I bought this and announced when I sold.”

You’ve been challenged on this before, by others. You SAY you have announced when you’ve bought and sold but haven’t given any evidence of that. When challenged, you just stamp your feet and repeat your assertion that you did, like a child.

Go on then - produce the evidence. Like I did, quote where you’ve supposedly said this AND give links.

As shown in my link below, you don’t do this. You make assertions while refusing to produce evidence and trying to fob people off with “I said it”. What else would I expect? You’re called BillyBS for good reason.

Oh BillyBS, if only you would keep your promise not to speak to me.

You insult me (and others - I’m not the only one) - it’s the hallmark of low intellect and an admission that you can’t find fault in what I say because it’s true - so, thanks for the admission.

I have held a light up to your verbal abuse and BS and you hate that. That’s why you you insult me. I lap up your insults - you are judged by the company you keep so your insults are a compliment.

It’s hilarious - you, the man who can’t even spell your own name, call me an idiot. The man who struggles to string a sentence together. The man who actually said (this is a classic): “Wolf, I have been in business a long time and I explained to you a long time ago, I’m an expert in maths.”

Yes, to become an expert in maths, poorinvester thinks you just say “I am an expert in maths”. He’s so dim that he doesn’t see the flaw in this.

It gets better. In the SAME comment he wrote:
“Let me simply fly for you...”
Both condescension and low intellect in a mere five words! Poorinvester, you truly are the gift that keeps giving.

Your insults are projection. Read your comment again - it reveals so much about you.

“CloudyMountain, I am not going to have a debate with you, so consider this my last post to you for a while”.

That’s at 1306. A mere 10 minutes later he addresses me with another comment! We know we can’t take your word for anything, BillyBS, but I didn’t realise you’re actively trying to prove it. Cheers!