Member Info for CloudyMountain

No.

It is like stumbling upon someone being sold something worthless, telling them it’s worthless only to be treated with suspicion or even derision.

Even though Cineworld said shareholders would get wiped out, people on here STILL refused to believe it, blinded by the vertiginous drop in the share price and fantasies about what would happen if that drop were reversed.

Never underestimate people’s ability to deceive themselves. It truly is remarkable.

We had all the same arguments with Thomas Cook, Carillion and other companies. People bought in after conducting personal, in-depth financial analysis (“Look at the SP graph! See how far it’s fallen! Look at what I’ll make if it goes back up!” - that was it in total) only to see the SP slide and slide.

For one in particular, that was great news - the more it fell, the more of a bargain he felt it was (in his deluded eyes).

Cineworld doesn’t have a future. True - ordinary cinema customers won’t notice any difference but current shareholders will.

What has a future is you. You’ll learn from your mistakes, dust yourself off and use what you’ve learned with CINE to make a profit on your future investments.

Someone on here told me not to tell them what to do with their money (accompanied by insults, of course). I said I didn’t and it was up to them what they did with it but I wouldn’t touch CINE with a bargepole. Those people got burnt. They chose to get burnt. They can learn from it or not.

@Hexam - “Haha - I'd rather leave the quantum mechanics explaining to somebody else.”

Challenge accepted!

In Schrodinger's imaginary experiment, you place a comment by a impecunious invester (sic) in a box with a cat. Wait a few days then open the box. If the SP has fallen, the post says “I knew it would fall. I’ve made a profit”. If the SP has risen, the post says “I knew it would rise, I’ve made a profit”.

The cat is there to scare off the commenter, for everyone’s sanity.

In quantum mechanics, a commenter’s ability to make a profit both in a rising and falling market until the comment is observed and as long as no evidence has to be disclosed is referred to as “quantum Dunning-Kruger”.

@dagenham, get with the programme! You should have written:

“Is This Crap Still Going You All Still Here I Thought I Would Look In For A Change Same Deluded Posts So Back Out”

@Oneforthemoney. That’s like going out for the night with two friends, one of whom doesn’t flash the cash while the other is generous, drives a better car and lives in a better area. The former may be financially comfortable and with little or no mortgage while the other may be up to his neck in debt.

You can’t judge a company by its cover (e.g. seating & sound system).

I prefer “Rushed Lakes” by the way.

Oh BillyBS, you have demonstrated that you have an agenda, that you are full of it, and that you are an idiot. Projection is something that you do.

You just can’t hide your low IQ - it seeps out of your posts.

One of your tactics against anyone who has the temerity to criticise you is to make false allegations against them. You’ve done it again in your comment here. It’s just what you do.

But, Billy, I forgive you because I can see how insecure you are, because you’ve made a fool of yourself, and because you’re nursing monumental losses. I understand.

x

@poorinvester “Speaking of idiots, Hi cloudymuppet. Do you not think i'm becoming a bit of an obsession with you?”

No, you’re light entertainment. I look to see what’s the latest dumb thing you’ve said, what new childish insults you’ve used and your latest delusion about your cognitive abilities. It’s amusing.

What I can’t keep up with is the rate at which you fall out with people. It really is remarkable. I doubt even you can keep up with it. Pretty well everywhere you go, you annoy people - it’s a clue.

“Blackbridge, you seem like a immature child posting on here…”

Projection, @poorinvester, projection.

“Usual”, not “unusual”.

Because some people are not very bright, like poorinvester. Anyone following his advice is likely to have lost a small fortune. For example, on 18/4/23 when the SP was 1.10p he said (after his unusual primary school playground insults) “I’ll see you at 1.50p”. It was 1.10p then. It’s 0.36 now. That’s a 67% loss in under three months!

The stock market loves the stupid.

@poorinvester: “You might as well go down cloudy muppets way and make something false up.”

This is interesting. Go on then, BillyBS. What did I supposedly make up? Quote it.

It’s annoying, isn’t it, when you make a vague, false, allegation and the person you accuse asks you to substantiate it?

He then said:

“..:Cloudy mountain, what the? My calculations tell me, I should also put you in the filter bin for being stupid. I was expecting a better reply from you, never mind, I’ll see you at 1.50p lol”

That was on 18/4/23 at 1520, and his post records the SP as being 1.10p then. It’s now 0.36p. He’s lost 67% in just over 2 months! What a born loser!

That comment is here: https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=CINE&share=Cineworld&thread=4954BCD0-5AB4-487A-978C-1F7EC2B26EEA

Poorinvester replied:

“The reason for me to brag is, you lot keep telling other people what to do with their money and you have been wrong. I have done opposite to you parasitic vermin and I have been very successful. Why do you lot keep telling folks what to do with their hard earned money? 

All shares have risks attached to them, you just need to way your risk reward up and take a position accordingly”

OK, everyone, let’s learn from the finance guru. We have got to “way our risk reward”!

Yes, he is. As a rock.

“…I'm typing from my phone so have to keep the posts simple…”

Don’t worry. They always are.

@poorinvester said: “Why lie?”

???

Oh dear, poorinvester. Is it not just your money that you are losing?

Where’s the supposed lie? Quote it.

“…Remember you engaged me first.” (6 Jul 2023 23:31)

He didn’t engage you, he egested you.

@poorinvester wrote:

“…people like me never lose, yes I might lose my stake here but that's it…. Guys like me are always winners.”

Hilarious.

“…However, for me to become a degenerate human like you is the biggest loss. Remember you engaged me first.”

LOL. Poorinvester has a problem with almost everyone. I wonder why.

It’s a good one, isn’t it? @poorinvester is laugh-a-minute dim. He actually thinks a top City law firm might not have realised that U.K. laws are not the same as US laws.

He’s not only being besieged by City firms desperate to recruit him due to his recently revealed 90% success rate, now he’s got the same from City law firms. Word on the street is that they didn’t realise that criminal and civil laws are different and they want him to train up their lawyers urgently.

“Also I would like to add out of all the thick people on this board poorinvester outshines them all. I eagerly await a comment from you idiot boy, I need a good laugh.”

Oceanpassage replied:

“How deep you gone poorinvrstor did you pick up 10 shares or going balls deep with 20?”

I replied:

“Thanks, @poorinvester, for making me laugh. What an amusing thread.



I agree you’ve made a lot, just not of what you say. A steaming pile of it. We’re laughing at you because of it. 



We also know you’ll claim to have made money even when this is delisted, as dips and rises beforehand are guaranteed and you’ll claim to have bought on the former and sold on the latter, typing ever so boldly while the tears strike your keyboard...”

My prediction came true.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=CINE&share=Cineworld&thread=C1BE18A0-444A-40A6-B6B3-6DBEE9BB981E