Member Info for CloudyMountain

“Lol, there is always a laugh when Eddiemoron is about. Eddie the moronic idiot, is what every board needs”

Says “poor invester”, a man so deficient that he can’t even spell his own name!

That’s sad. That’s really sad.

Children respond to criticism of a topic by insulting the person saying it - puerile poor invester does the same.

Me: “You have to admire how Ian… imagines something to be true and then claims it’s a fact.

@Ianharding, a mere 15 minutes later: “CloudyMountain is also AimMaster2018. So many accounts. Sad.”

LOL. Thanks for the additional evidence, Ian.

I have something to add but I’ll save it for later ; 0)

Ianharding @ 1608: “AimMaster2018 where are you from, Canada or India?”

AimMaster doesn’t answer.

Ianharding @ 1707: “So AimMaster2018. You are a paid poster. From overseas. Added to the filtered list”

You have to admire how Ian jumps from his first to his second comment within an hour based on no evidence whatsoever. How he imagines something to be true and then claims it’s a fact.

This gives us an idea of the quality of his and rampers’ “research”.

Tegop, neil777’s comments are spot-on.

Neil omitted that it is highly unlikely anyone as dim as poorinvester would have £100k to invest - McDonalds doesn’t pay well.

“AimMaster, how much do you get paid to post?”
============================================================

AimMaster, poorinvester wants to know as he suffers from verbal diarrhoea and fantasises about turning that to his advantage. He’s posted 336 comments in the last 30 days - if he were paid, say, £1/comment, in the last 30 days he’d have been paid more than his entire “£100k” investment in CINE so far.

@Ianharding: “Cineplex will lose appeal”.

I didn’t know that you are a lawyer. Please set out your legal basis for coming to this conclusion.

======================================================

Ian later posts on here but ignores my question. But that failure to answer is an answer - it’s an admission that saying Cineplex will lose the appeal is pure supposition and is therefore ramping.

Sat 27/8/22 1319, poorinvester says to me - after his usual, dim, verbal abuse: “...My last post to you, don’t bother replying, I won’t read it” (link below).

At midnight - less than eleven hours later - he breaks that. What a joke he is! I knew he would do that because you can’t believe a word he says and because he’s so dim.

The muppet even calls me a muppet - LOL. Projection is common among these types.

Hey, muppet, I’m not giving you a solution and I’m not giving you my research - you don’t deserve it. I think you should sell your house (as if) and everything you own and put the full £500 in Cineworld. Then work all the overtime you can at McDonalds and put that in too. Don’t worry - you can tell us on here that the £500 was £10,000.

You want my advice, poorinvester? Go back to primary school to be educated in how to write English, and dial back on the verbal abuse and arrogance.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=CINE&share=Cineworld&thread=92C3F6FE-9484-4297-9460-B7A95EE2E031

@Ianharding: “Cineplex will lose appeal”

I didn’t know that you are a lawyer. Please set out your legal basis for coming to this conclusion.

Let’s not forget shazabo & poorinvester who haven’t got a clue. Poorinvester even ends his last comment in this thread with “imho” which is funny - he’s the precise opposite i.e. arrogant.

They are ignorant too. It’s evident from their comments that they don’t know what they are talking about. Poorinvester’s intellect is such that he can’t string a sentence together - he can’t even spell his own name!

They are both welcome to play roulette with their own money (while telling themselves that it’s investing) - let’s just hope that they haven’t drawn too many newbies in with them.

Typical ramping followed by the usual verbal abuse when called out for it: https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=CINE&share=Cineworld&thread=92C3F6FE-9484-4297-9460-B7A95EE2E031

@poorinvester, birds of a feather flock together. I would expect nothing different from you or shazabo. Your comment says so much about you and your character.

A man Is known by the company he keeps - first you alongside shazabo, second the two of you (and those of a similar mind) disliking me. I am so pleased that you dislike me, and even more pleased that you dislike me so much - it is a positive reflection on my character. Cheers!

@shazabo: “... Typical of someone who... comments day and night ..”

30 seconds of research reveals that I have written 55 posts in the last 30 days compared with shazabo’s 240! It’s a double - hypocrisy and laziness.

But shazabo isn’t into research, preferring to put money into a share and shout “Come on my son, only one furlong to go!” in the discussions at it, and to personally insult anyone who dares to hold a different opinion. Some people are like that.

@shazabo, my comment about ramping still stands. Your reply doesn’t even dispute that - thanks for confirming you can’t dispute it.

The *slightest* bit of research would have shown that your remarks about me are untrue but then we know that: (a) research isn’t your thing; and (b) personal insults are.

Typical ramping post.

@Jtan said: “Shazabo... What are you gonna say when the shares actually 'do' get suspended?”

“I sold out just before they were suspended”, as his tears strike his keyboard, and as he continues to throw personal insults at people who have the audacity to hold a different opinion to him.

(Of course it’s your money and of course you can spend it as you wish. Why is it so threatening for some of us to say that we consider Cineworld not worth investing in?)

“My local Sainsbury sold 1000 apples yesterday but only 500 apples were bought - how was this possible?”

It was a “Buy two only get one, not free” offer, the latest version of BOGOF. The rampers would fall for it.

People were predicting yesterday that the SP would rocket today due to that article. I wonder why the market hasn’t reacted positively to an FT article that is 6 months old.

@Bonkers2021 “ I think the majority of people slamming this share are either:
1) LTH - who have given up and can’t average down
2) SHORTERS...”

And: 3) People who’ve looked at the share and decided to avoid it. People with some idea of genuine financial analysis, not “Look! It’s fallen a lot. Therefore it could go up a lot!” (that’s it - that’s the analysis). Or in the case of @poorinvester “...and it did that two years ago too. That almost proves it’ll recover.”

Too many people’s financial analysis means a 5-second look at the share price chart.

You’re right. It’s six months old.

@poorinvester’s English is atrocious. That explains why his financial analysis is so poor.

He can’t even spell his own name!