Extraordinary company12 Jun 2020 09:46
I've seen some dodgy companies but how about this....from results to Dec 2018....
Origo's Catastrophic Destruction of Shareholder Value
Origo represents a catastrophic destruction of shareholder value. Of the approximately $276 million that the Company raised, only about $6.3 million remains on the Company balance sheet mostly in the form of cash and a few investments noted above. No real capital was ever returned to shareholders. The Company never paid a dividend and besides peculiar share repurchases in 2012 and a few years later totalling a little more than $700,000, never returned capital through a buy back. The remainder was dissipated in, as best as we can tell, shockingly bad investments, fees paid to OAL and others, fees paid to former board members, fees paid to the former Nomad, fees paid to lawyers, fees paid to previous auditors and so on.
Several of us trying to unravel the Origo story have noticed that so much of what the Company did benefited a privileged few to the detriment of the Company's shareholders. So, a former director's daughter ended up with a board seat and also a consulting contract. The father of an OAL principal ended up in some business relationship with the Company. An early investor in the Company, a large London based "hedge fund," paid the Company for "research." The Company then rebated much of this payment to an employee of the hedge fund who also happened to be the then Executive Chairman's wife. Non-transparent subsidiary companies were formed where insiders and family members seem to have had financial interests. Origo made investments in a company, and later its former CEO went to work for an affiliate of that company. Lawyers, even by London standards, did shockingly well. The previous Nomad, the lawyers and the former auditors were well paid for work that had little or no benefit to shareholders. OAL was rewarded with interest accruing at 8% in order to pay the fees that the Company was unable to pay because OAL had failed to sell assets sufficient to pay its fees. And so on.
There are many ways to slice and dice the Origo numbers, and, unfortunately, we do not now control all of the information necessary to forensically dissect the Company. The former board has not been forthcoming in providing information and a lot of the Company records we have received are a mess. Our administrator's accountants have thus used Origo's published accounts and by working backward have tried to recreate the Company's flow of funds. There are, unfortunately, still some large gaps in our knowledge.
Nonetheless, we think it is possible to roughly show where the money went. On 1 January 2011, Origo had cash in the bank of $33.4 million. During 2011 the Company raised $92.5 million. In 2016, the Company also borrowed $2.5 million in order to meet its expenses since by that time it had burned though most of its cash. So roughly where did that money go?
The Company seems to have made net inve