Member Info for CitizenTS

Thing is the BP thing moves investor opinion. Don't see BP itself doing something in FI (or would be huge tirn-up if it did) but the whole episode will bring other investors in.

Ha, godders is out and sounds like already suffering seller's remorse. Seems I'm not the only one thinking was too early to sell and tradeable dip not materiising.

Cheerio MD, we'll see whether or not there's any tradeable dip from here. Fwiw guess not! Out too early on any longer view I'd say but who knows!

Cheers

Was referring to Mogger's link to FIG meeting re SL decomm

Mogger's

@ S Hoppa? to my mind the any resolution on the decomm costs in one of .other's recent posts is more important just now

Different world post FID. Clear path to USD 150 million per annum profit, twice that later in the existing development plan, and eventually ...

Just beware some of the subtle or not so subtle intimations in that NEO link/article.

NEO is Russian influence/information/disinformation conduit.

Do at least note their contact address on https://journal-neo.su/about/

Just beware some of the subtle or not so subtle intonation s in that NEO link/article.

NEO is Russian influence/I formation/

Some thoughts. Not quite sure of his game plan. At 70 for WTI (say 73 for Brent) some shale fields start quite quickly running off/closing down. But we're, as ever, going to see some volatility.

If he has a game plan it has to have the effect of displacing Russian oil on the world market in the low 70s. Sounds an unlikely target but hey, maybe.

Opening up possibly cheaper conventional oil on federal lands, unless its on a huge scale at some point, might just push the price down a bit from here and displace some US shale. But he also envisages greater consumption as well.

More of a reconnaissance exercise today. Fancy we'll be back with the troops next week, even Monday the way this is behaving.

G1 etc were all good with some interpretation. ' gclarke was a total insider imho!!

Includes, not "nudes", dratted spellcheck!!!

@JEBR, think it means they're issuing NIS400m. It was a tender and the larger number is the total tenders received. That nudes tenders at interest rates fpr which Navitas are not accepting the tender.

That's as I read it.

Interesting this is Nav borrowing, not partners/jv/project borrowing.

Oops, maybe just found a little as I typed.

Share price is moving (was that a 36p mark?) on relatively, in recent terms, little volume after the earlier lower marks. Looks like a bit of a void of sellers just around here. Next stop?

Navitas's shenandoah debt should be something like all repaid in 15 months or so from now, especially at these oil prices

Sos Alma but on this occasion am going to challenge/disagree. The whole control/market maker manipulation is a bulletin board fantasy. May have had a tiniest shred of credibility when we had jobbers etc, many decades ago, but that's it.

What may happen is that a player with direct market access puts many 10k limit orders on to both have access to small lot counterparties and perhaps to disguise that there's actually a big buyer or seller out there. We may see these limits hit. Also possible of course that they're hit by an equally sizey counterparty. We wouldn't know.

Ha, on the way back up for now as well!

Been a modest dip. We'll see if this one let's the weak hearted off quite so lightly as it has so far. Markets don't tend to work like that! If not this dip then others are likely to be far more brutal I'm afraid along the road to our sunny destination..