RE: Choices21 Sep 2020 17:16
We're probably going to have to agree to disagree here but Whitty & Vallance do not strike me as fame hungry men. They strike me as dullards dedicated to their work. Scientists by nature are highly conservative with their language, they are not bombastic and don't throw out opinions if not backed up with evidence. Your points about antibodies and t-cells are not 100% accurate. There are hundreds of thousands of asymptomatic cases with antibodies. Granted antibody levels across the country definitely do not tell the whole story but it makes sense for the scientists to paint the bleakest picture, juxtaposed against a Boris that will probably come out all guns blazing tomorrow...
In the end of the day their job is to keep people safe from covid but as Chris Whitty highlighted earlier, they are aware of the adverse effects tight restrictions cause - in many cases unemployment > poverty > deprivation > death. And that's the reason we won't end up in a full lockdown again...
I mean an enquiry over the initial lockdown? Come on man. If you can't see that in the face of a novel threat the government reacted in the only way they could then you really are clueless. You can't compare like-for-like. The situation in the UK (particularly London) was far worse when we had the lockdown than Sweden, for example, ever encountered. Its impossible to know what would have happened if we didn't lock down but it almost certainly wouldn't have been fine and dandy.
As for NEX, I'm in agreement with you there! I try to see the media fear mongering as a stock market opportunity. I'm certain we'll have no lockdown or restrictions that'll affect NEX so I try to predict the market sell offs and take advantage when I can...