Member Info for CHRI5P

Transferring from one ISA can take weeks and you can see there is no real market on the JSE with the sell at 27 and the bid at 25.

My ISA is with Barclays and they still hold my WTI shares who delisted and went bust over 6 years ago.

Even if we receive the Denarius shares I was sure I would not be able to hold them in my ISA.

I have virtually no other shares outside my SIPP or ISA so I am not too angry about having some shares outside and if and when there is a market I will look at opening an ISA with an appropriate ISA manager or sell yearly.

I will not move away from Barclays. Barclays have a flexible ISA and so any cash can be moved out and as long as you put it back before the end of the tax year you do not lose your allowance- HL and II don't allow this.

I remember Myles saying that the 1p was the equivalent to the SP when the shares were suspended in May last year and that he wanted to at least achieve that. It is good we received the 1p and I did say 5 weeks ago that you can have unlisted in a SIPP but not an ISA. If AJ can trade EUZ through their brokerage then in theory you should be able to move all your shares from II and then put them back into the AJ ISA and lose part of your yearly ISA allowance.

By the way I don't think negative posts causes investors to sell GLR rather it discourages new investors to buy. People will sell due to lowering risk, inpatient, death or the need of funds. People don't buy due to sentiment and price might go lower. We can all help sentiment.

Very good find JL

Positive posts help positive SP trades, simple.

In the meantime I am happy to receive good RNS's on drilling prospects and results while we wait and anyone who are so desperate to receive a monerterising RNS they moan about good RNS's should really not be invested in GLR because they are just depressing a very low SP with extremely low sentiment.

The point about BZT is that they are starting the plan to monetise H&G which is a similar size to Luansobe but a much smaller OP part of the mine which have the much greater margin. They only have one other asset in the Kalahari which SFR refused to develop. BZT SP is up 5 fold in 18 months. However, they were a much smaller valued company to GLR when the multi-bagger started. Nevertheless, they have had more than one placement a year in 6 years previous to the SP rise and loads of cheap warrants to be exercised causing dilution without raising a huge amount of money.

GLR have warrants that would raise £3.6 million causing a 15% dilution.

We also have 9 possible assets to develop, sell or receive a bonus/profit from excluding Luansobe.

Finally, CB and co have come good for BZT after more than a decade of a failing SP and billions of issued shares.

CB and co can do it for GLR and I believe they will and I am still adding to my stake.

Yes we have impatient shareholders who have never run a exploration company desperate for a 50% spike but I want a lot more. We only need to sell Kash^tu or one the other assets and Luansobe will have a plan to mine and we will multi bag.

Sorry the BZT mine is H&G

Yes, JL BZT were the first to monetise thier small mining license. I was invested in BZT but missed the big push without losing any money overall. BZT only had one asset to work on and mining it was the only real option. However, after many, many placements their other asset they sold out of and this quite large amount of money gave them the cash to go forward with H&C without dilution. Nevertheless, they will need a large finance package and with a huge amount of warrants waiting to be exercised dilution will be massive. Shareholders are seeing through the dilution and CB has come good.

GLR! ANY SIMILARITIES. TICK, TICK TICK

Some nice trades in the last couple of days and many good posts over the weekend. Hopefully, it will continue.

Maybe you getting suspended permanently will improve the integrity of the board. The idea you have inside information is laughable

No way your stories are entertaining while we wait

Iky I said well done making money trading and there is no reason why you shouldn't. Making up inside information is what is wrong IMO.

Prem is still 99% down since you recommended them 3 years ago.

Well done Iky on your trading. You probably trade GLR makinng up inside information to encourage buyers and then sell out when the SP moves higher.

Dm I am not going to stop complaining about LTM's trashing the company and driving the SP down.

JL your post mentioned real issues for you without blatantly moaning about the company. I just hope the moaners can take your post on board but Levi was posting nonsense 6 years ago and let's all hope they and others can see the light.

JL if there is no information to RNS then there is no major changes happening and so investors have to research the information themselves. Now I realise this is very subjective but personally I don't want a RNS stating what I already know or can easily find out. The website is updated and is a very good read if shareholders are bothered to actually do that like yourself. For a 10 million pound company that is sufficient and anyone who disagrees should sell up.

CB does give podcast to encourage new investors and those shareholders who struggle to understand the RNS's. The problem is CB might exaggerate and then be held to account on a whimper. The biggest problem is our own investors don't like the company they have put their money in but can't sell even though they want to because they actually might be very wrong.

Sentiment is the answer anans

Buyers return maybe my anti LTM posts are working

Agree JL

The intelligent investors email/phone the company to state their issues. The idiots enjoy washing their underwear in the public.

Just bought another 700,000 because I am very happy with management.

Probably the first post to lower the SP

If we do get an RNS stating the licence extension the LTM's will be anoyed because it means more ďrills to be completed