Member Info for chopper99

Jarvis came through at about 15.00 today, so it is still happening and plenty of time yet. GLA

Every Sunday, I always go to Yahoo Sports for my investment advice, then I read the football results on LSE.

I'm no expert but 'Simply Wall St' seems to be regarded on other BBs as less than the site of record. I've seen the AI Generation comment often.

https://uk.yahoo.com/finance/news/ships-circling-off-southwestern-spain-050532031.html

Up 2.67% of course!

I just topped up at 1.95 but the 'Quick Tips' is showing it has jumped to 2.67.

Maybe I got lucky for once....

As much as I admire and appreciate Paddy & Co, 'sitting on our hands' probably wasn't the best strategy for many holders.

It now appears that early investors would have been much better-off to have sold the lot at around 32p, kept half of the resulting cash as immediate profit, then bought back double the original amount of shares at 8p a year or so later!

Now, a lot of us have been fence-sitting. Isn't hindsight wonderful...... GLA

Thanks Push. I doubt most on here (including me) are aware of the implications and trade-offs of what is going on down there.

Some technical info and explanation is badly needed to balance the emotions, bitterness and ramping/deramping on here.

Terry's All Gold?

Hi Yngun. I think a lot of us older people on here are in a similar position, so you aren't on your own.

Somehow, we all seem to have picked up on this being a very special company that has amazing products. If all goes well, a lot of cancer victims will have their treatments enhanced in wonderful ways. And we will make some money!

Owning over a thousand shares at your age could bring great benefits to you and best held in an ISA for tax reasons (if we get really lucky!). Just keep saving steadily.

There are some very clever people on here with good advice. There are also some people that will waste your time and money. There are also some miserable old crusties who just like to moan.

The number of 'Recommends' under a post gives you some idea of the poster's credibility. Read up on something like 'Investopedia' to figure out the jargon.

Good luck!

"It's like me going to watch Manchester United, sitting in the home end and singing Leeds United songs."

Haha, if the stewards didn't turf you out, you might not survive too long! That sort of thing has been know to invite trouble.....

Yes, the 'Sunday Sport' was the then newspaper of record and gave us such exclusives as 'This Human Pig ate my Farmyard'.

The 'Bomber on the Moon' was an incredible article supported by a bodged up photo. At the end of the story, they listed about 5 possible reasons that the bomber could have landed on the Moon; one was alien activity but the last was that it was a fake story. I suspect we see more than a few of those on here but without the reasons (we have to guess those).

I said some weeks ago that unless we planned and voted together, we would be screwed. This BB is pretty well dead and even when there is (often interminable) debate these days, it is usually about pub meetings and ancient topics.

Some time back, a lot of effort went into trying to count the shares held by PIs in order to prove 'we' owned the company. Let's see if it works........

Meanwhile we need a lawyer-led debate about the significance of Resolution 3. onwards.

The way things are going, we might be glad of a 25p offer now!

Have you read Resolution 3 onwards?

We turkeys seem to have a bit of a choice this time but after?

Haha, I bet an awful lot of people fell for it, though!

Not often we get something amusing on here:)

I see that we are having the third set of Price Monitoring Extensions in a week. Are they gloating at the damage they caused (and continue to do)?

Has anyone had any sort of response from the 'Board of Directors'?

From the report linked by AJones a few minutes ago (written by one Toby Bradbury) and dated 18 Aug 22:

"The true value of Rambler makes the current balance sheet, as well as future capital growth requirements, eminently manageable issues from which shareholders can realise significant upside".

I remember discussing RMM with a very senior member of this BB a couple of years ago. We agreed that despite all of the negatives experienced, it was a share with a future and that we were quietly confident that it would boom.

Some very interesting points and conclusions (maybe) on this BB over the last 2 days. Apart from all of those, I think that disappointment in the BoD is palpable.

Very difficult to sell out (my holding is minute compared to many on here) so almost reconciled to losing the lot in the worst case.

Absolutely disgusted and diappointed!

I didn't drink alcohol until I got posted to Catterick for a year!

"Radiotheranostics", nice big word that! I wonder how many readers know what it means?

It has "ranos" in it, so it must have something to do with frogs (according to one Board member:)

It all sounds excellent, anyway. Well done for the research. GLA.

Hmm, was just about to query the pipe cleaner bit. Mine were much plainer than those.

I sold most of my PHE shares some time ago but look in occasionally out of perplexed curiousity. It's been very tempting to add some further caustic comments over the months/years but you aren't supposed to kick holders when they are down.

I see that the legendary 0.5 l plastic bottle is still being kicked down the road (let's face it, it isn't likely to propel anything by itself in the foreseeable future, unfortunately).

I never understood 'Dilbert's' "Bungee Boss" until I saw Mr Dextrose fly by after such a short time in office - he doesn't seem to have lasted as long as the illustrious TY!

Joking aside, this company must be one of the strangest ever. Such needs for its product and so much goodwill - then staggering delays through inertia and incompetence.

I could say much more but maybe time for some soothing noises again, this time from me, rather than the usual loyal claque; "Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur.....". That's it, back to sleep poor shareholders.....

I really do hope something works out for you all.