Member Info for chippyjo

The twitteratzy effect....

Hi Piltick. It was emailed before I left for a business trip.
If no response I may try to hand deliver when I return.

Says JeoyT who registered less than 4 weeks ago and been rampety ramp here since. Who were you before?

...is like choosing to visit some place you don't like to go
CF, More like got there and the car broke down...

The GR factor, expect the expected....

Yes BB that’s assuming there is no positive update. From what was said we should have been past the finish line....

Force the company to be commercial would be a start. Efficient and timely comms, updates, timescales etc.
Keeping the shop window in order. Appraise the market accordingly etc I could go on but I'm only one shareholder. Its for a group majority t decide really.
If necessary a scalp my be appropriate i guess....

Nap
65,000 km2 is near enough same size as Ireland
But Ireland doesn’t have potato’s under every square meter either so no need to assume the EPO has lithium in quantity in large areas of EPO claim.
Also some ramping up the other in ground resources like gold

No reply from company so far. Numbers are still increasing so closing in on the 10%.
EGM otherwise.....

Evening Acker. No more posting from me for a few days now. Work beckons ....

Nap as much as you won’t believe me, I really hope that’s true as I’ve got somewhere else I’d like the money tied up in this to be.

1: RHA had $20m development, mining equipment and even a zimgov bailout but little ore and none that was economic
2: We have a 20m tonne PFS no cash and no JV partner. Also “it’s been said it’s on on a par with Pilbara” by who, a load of rampers on a BB
3: see above
4:all surmise with no fact or evidence geologically except by general location in Zim
5: Circum the carrot that nobody gets to taste, it’s been just around the corner for years and some here are saying it’s cash in the bank for shareholders. Yes there was 1 option of a divi for shareholders but with the caveat of paying debt which GR builds better than ants build anthills
6: we have no relationship with MNh other than a loan providing a 10% return. Take away costs to prem of raising that money and the effect on the share price it was terrible for prem shareholders.
7: No exploration of any note and no money as GR spent it on timber, game lodges, casa, etc
8: GR will be taken out of prem headquarters in a box, I don’t believe he has any intention of going.
It’s a cozy cartel in AIM and it’s not weighted in favour of the shareholders.
I will rejoice WHEN something real happens like RHA producing profitably or Zulu DFS. The rise in share price has been good for the traders, those who aggressively averaged down and new joiner investors but as I see it very little has changed.
Even the chairman position which had a strict deadline has drifted by.....

Which bit IQ1.57?

MNH is a loan, no more no less. With a fairly small return and in the process buggering the share price and diluting us.

Circum, that carrot is now a fossil. It may get dug up....

And take a loss Andy.....no. Much better to say it how it is. It’s a public bb and filter if you don’t like it. And no, I didn’t really buy in that high.

If it’s 4 years magoo I’ll be fine

This is the problem cf, you can’t keep this going on hot air. It needs real progress at project and commercial levels.
You can keep saying 1p this 0.5p that but it’s income and good governance that makes successful companies. We have little to none of that.

Hi Heath, thanks for the offer of assistance, appreciate it.
I've got two redeyes to the US and back wed/fri so I may be less available later in the week.

Ok BB, realistically speaking, how am I going to administer 127 different shareholdings on a weighted scale in both time and mathematically? Especially as there have been changes to their holdings as many I guess averaged down.
There is also the reason why anyone would want this? Do we need to do an IQ check of all shareholders to check they have both the mental capacity and intelligence to vote? It could be made so difficult to administer that it becomes a worthless exercise.
All of the direct feedback I have received has been positive. If somebody no longer wishes to be in the group then I will deduct their total. THIS IS NOT WHAT I WANT. And I'm not suggesting you withdraw either.
As for strategy and letter writing, I'm happy to delegate to a willing volunteer if one should step forward.
Maybe you can tell us what you would like to do for the next step?