RE: SP10 Mar 2019 06:28
Morning crumbs, glad you responded too. In fact I enjoy your posts and links probably the most, particularly the self depreciating manner in which you qualify your posts and make very clear there are no guarantees of anything. It has been a pleasure posting with you and i think we have both been adding what we can afford regularly to arrive at the holdings we have. Our confidence of the science is shared, and the market has worked in our favour the last couple of years.
Neither of us make out we are anything but what we are. So that is two horseman vindicated.
Presumably that leaves three, unlike Knowlesi I will name them, Ray, Wildforce and Inanaco. Had the pleasure to meet Wild at AGMs a politer poster would be very hard to find, and his knowledge of this share i aspire too. Ray, inoffensive,argues the case for with genuine reasons for doing so. Never abusive as Knowlesi claims.
So Knowlesi, unless i have missed out another ""horseman"", this is what you posted yesterday, and repeat and rinse every time you post................................
""Ray - yeah but the line is crossed when any other view isnt allowed, any poster not following the "house view" is attacked."""
Knowlesi you might want to explain that more fully, it might even have had some truth in it four years ago, but that is not what i see, particularly when anybody just posts honestly about how they feel. That can never be wrong it is somebodies opinion and I admire those posts, understand them and they help others not to feel they are alone. It has been good to hear from so many LTHs in recent times expressing their frustration which i have agreed with, it is frustrating, and if any one of those posters would like to respond and confirm what you say i would be very very surprised.
It is my opinion that you returned here intent on causing bad feeling, finding someone to blame for a falling SP and as they do do anything to achieve what you would consider a good price to buy quantity in, and whilst that is not a crime, accusing others of ramping and bullying as you have done, bringing down their credibility with false claims is highly in comprehensible. Just look again at my posts just yesterday they express my exact feelings and understanding of how people might feel, yes I am angry at your posts, and the fact you feel the need to stoop so low, loses IMHO any credibility you have.
On looking in on the other BB last week i did so interested in their thoughts about City Financial, but i saw a post by ONW claiming Rhatton was abused for telling us he had sold out at 11.5p. I remember thanking him for letting us know who had sold at that time a decent quantity, and wishing him all the best. I remember maybe six others doing the same thing. Nobody abused him, but as ever a slur was made, baseless, untrue and you are doing the same thing. Why???