VAL18 Mar 2019 21:15
Haven"t looked in here for a while, but seem to notice a difference for the better in many posts, and the gradual improvement in posts far less antagonistic then what they were. Many hopes seem to being placed in the hopes of between now and end Q1 the release of news pertaining to good news (as promised)
Unfortunately history as for many shares is against those timelines, and hopes they will, seem more to be taking into account big losses, the feeling of taking them rather than any breakthroughs in the fundamentals of VAL. Should those who have invested here and suffered heavy losses have any less rights to post their opinions?? No, surprised it is still an issue, or someone like me having traded this share twice, currently a non holder be omitted when if certain news was released a trade might even occur again. Seems very odd to me that those with VAL on their watchlist, regardless of current situation should be made to feel so unwelcome, but that is a long standing issue just still carrying on. All views should be welcome, or is it just the views of those who have been wrong that are so crucial.
So another two weeks to end of Q1, I tried to engage GM in a few questions, actually shocked by his rudeness and refusal to attend the Investors Shows. Doesn"t send out a good message whichever way you look at it,
So, understanding heavy losses as i do, wishyou all something to hang on to, in the run up to deadlines, we have seen in recent months the meltdown in SP in MTFB and IMM, just to mention a few, not a great advert for the attraction ff shares in the Bio sector, and reminders of funding difficulties too. All issues affecting many shares, bare that in mind. Goodnight.