Member Info for Chaebol

I have reported your post as its completely off-topic and contains false and misleading accusations with zero relevance to GST or the investment discussion. It appears to be a deliberate attempt to harass another user and derail the thread.

Well done, Chef.

I’m sure everyone who looked at this company, and then wisely decided not to pull the trigger, is now quietly whispering, 'There but for the grace of God... I almost bought that 'bargain' at a penny x;)

What would I be banned for ?

Lower share prices and failed licenses, LSE gonna ban me for that.

Lots told me it was fud when I said 0.2p and many said it won't go under the NAV Chaebol, its been under the NAV for 32 days now....lol

Initial SAFT (April 2022): Coinsilium invested $200,000 USD to secure its initial exposure to YELLOW tokens.

Second SAFT: A "subsequent additional SAFT" was used to reach the total allocation of 50 million tokens.

Does anyone know the money amount coin invested on the second SAFT?

Lol

If they werent rocket reach you were referring to accounts that werent in existence at the time.

Well after your 45 million claim that matches rocket reach figures, It was Lloyd that told the board here that the Semnet accounts were available because I bought them shortly after that post.

Now youre talking about 9 million in lost revenue oh dear

Bill I know you hadnt gone over those semnet accounts because we went back and forth on the operation expenses v the tax bill and anyone whos seen the semnet accounts knows its 311k in tax on the 1.75 million bonus, so now youre just making stuff up again. You referred to rocket reach as its accounts because the semnet accounts had still not been published when you said you had accessed them x;)

I called lower prices from 1.25 p I called .2 at .6 you all called me fud and bs and then it hit it ! I said no MiCA and LT gone and Poland is another sheet show that had no passporting ever.

but its all fud and despair from me lol and yet the sp is down massively......

But somehow you're right in all this, I pity the people that followed your buys which were many sadly x

Yes BFD and new terms and services explicitly state the language of CASS PSD/25 protocols, in how they segregate and look after your funds.

Many firms have already updated their TOS on safeguarding rules on websites and socials etc to reflect this new rule change from the 7th. Asking Angra about there current safeguarding rules and how they look to implement them left Tim answering questions incorrectly and their subsequent answers leaves a lot to be desired imo. Bu then TIm is only IR and has the prefect get outs when it all goes wrong!

I remember when I was on them about the 25 million a day volume on gs20 exchange and Tim was telling me that he was trying really hard with the BOD to get those figures fixed lol ended up about 40 million for the year lol

Bill its information always.

If I had found anyhting half decent and looked good I would have gone long here, every rabbit hole ive gone down wiht this firm has shown something else to me than it does to you guys, but I guess when you claim you own 150 odd million shares but wont pay 15 quid for semnet financials I find oyur information wanting bill. tbh.

The price downwards for 16 months has proven my case.

Billy, what has GS fintech done in LT from January 1? It hasn't done any crypto there has it.

They stayed their execution by then buying. aVASP int he worst jurisdiction in the EU which I called at the time as well. 3 months later toast.

Https://wise.com/help/articles/2949821/how-wise-keeps-your-money-safe

Updated in March to reflect the new rules from May 7th many smaller firms have already updated their terms as well. Verto 3s money Airwallex etc.

Oh what like Bake and GS fintech being suspended, many told me I was very confused on that as well. 'And it was all out there'

Cool so I look forward to this being updated by the 7th then, asking when they are going to update that document is not asking for too much Im asking them to confirm they are remaining legal next Thursday.

https://angrafx.com/assets/Security-and-Safeguarding.pdf

The FCA PS25/12 Supplementary Regime, featuring strict CASS 15 and CASS 10A standards for daily reconciliations and resolution packs, becomes mandatory on May 7, 2026. Angra’s current public-facing security documentation, which cites outdated PSD2/EMR standards, requires immediate updating to reflect these new, legally required safeguards. For further details on the upcoming regulatory changes, review the FCA's publication at FCA.

Well I followed it up and then got ignored which sums up GST tbf they were very general answers from Tim, once they become specific they ignore you again.

Dear Tim.

Again thank you for your prompt response and for the high-level assurances regarding Angra’s preparations for the new safeguarding regime.

However, with the 7 May 2026 deadline now only a matter of weeks away, I remain concerned that the responses provided are still somewhat general in nature.

I would be grateful for specific clarification on the following three key areas:

1. CASS Resolution Pack
Has the Angra Board formally approved and maintains a dedicated CASS Resolution Pack under CASS 10A that meets the specific document index and content requirements? Or is the firm currently relying primarily on a general Business Continuity Plan?

2. Safeguarding Audit Arrangements
For the 2026/27 period, can you confirm whether Angra’s external auditors have the necessary CASS-specific experience, permissions, and methodology in place to deliver the required annual safeguarding audit under the new SUP 3A framework?

3. Client Balance Data Export Capability
Although no major system upgrades were reportedly required for daily reconciliations, does Angra’s current platform support the automated extraction and production of individual client balance records in the precise format now expected for on-demand FCA inspection or resolution purposes

When will this be updated to reflect the new PS25 rules https://angrafx.com/assets/Security-and-Safeguarding.pdf

The Angra FX security and safeguarding document is not compliant with the new FCA safeguarding rules effective 7 May 2026, as it operates under the outdated PSD2/EMRs framework rather than the updated regime outlined in PS25/12. Specifically, the document fails to address the mandatory Resolution Pack (CASS 10A), more stringent CASS 15 daily reconciliation standards, and the required monthly regulatory returns

Given the proximity of the implementation date and the potential for increased supervisory scrutiny, enforcement action, or operational disruption in the event of any gaps, I believe clear confirmation on these technical milestones would provide significantly greater comfort to shareholders and the wider market than broad statements of readiness.

Thank you once again for your attention to this important matter.

Kind regards 

Hi Edward,

I understand the reassuring tone from Tim (IR), you guys feel reassured that youre applyting fro MiCA in Poland, however, I’m looking at the technical gap between "having something in place" and the prescriptive requirements of PS25/12 effective next week.

Tim’s response claims no upgrades are needed, yet Angra’s public Security and Safeguarding document still explicitly references the outdated PSD2/EMR framework. Under the new regime, the FCA is moving away from vague "appropriate" arrangements to a strictly mandated CASS 10A Resolution Pack and CASS 15 standards.

Specifically

The Resolution Pack (CASS 10A) The FCA now requires a "living" pack retrievable within 48 hours. Saying they have "something appropriate" doesn't confirm it meets the new standardised format required to prevent fund freezes.

Audit Timelines, Tim suggests the audit won't impact them until 2027, but the monthly regulatory returns and daily reconciliation requirements begin immediately on May 7th.

If the public-facing compliance docs aren't updated to reflect the new regime by next Thursday, there is a risk of a "non-compliant" flag from the FCA, regardless of what IR says in private emails. I’m staying cautious until we see the paperwork match the rhetoric.

I do remember the email last September from Tim telling me they were fully aligned with MiCA protocols and look how that panned out.

From: Tim Metcalfe <tim.metcalfe@investor-focus.co.uk>

Sent: 22 April 2026 14:53

Cc: Christopher Wellesley <c.wellesley@angrafx.com>

Subject: Re: SHAREHOLDER ENQUIRY Angra Limited Readiness for May 7th 2026 FCA Supplementary Regime

 

Dear Paul,

 

Thank you for your questions.  I am responding as GST’s investor relations adviser and to answer your questions:

 

1. Daily Reconciliation Capabilities Can you confirm that Angra has implemented the necessary system upgrades to facilitate daily internal and external reconciliations as mandated by the new regime?

Angra has for some time had these daily internal and external reconciliation systems in place, so no upgrade is required

 

2. Audit Preparedness The new rules require a mandatory annual safeguarding audit (CASS 15) for firms holding over £100,000 in client funds. Has Angra already selected a qualified external auditor for the 2026 period to ensure there are no delays in reporting?

Given the specific implementation timetable for this it will not impact Angra until the 2027 period and no issues are expected

 

3. Resolution Pack Maintenance: In accordance with the new insolvency planning requirements, has Angra finalised a CASS Resolution Pack CASS 10 A to ensure the rapid identification and return of client funds?

Angra has something appropriate already in place

 

4. Operational Cost Impact: As a shareholder, I am concerned about the increased overhead associated with these monthly reporting and annual audit requirements. Has the board assessed the impact of these compliance costs on Angra's 2026/27 operating budget?

There are no material additional cost implications expected from this new regime

 

Best regards

 

Tim

 

 

Tim Metcalfe

IFC Advisory

Managing Director

I thank Tim because he is stuck in the middle of this and is only being told what to say…

The BOD are winging it brilliantly.

Chased up Angra last week, vague reply from IR as usual but atm Angra Docs not compliant from the 7th May. Lets see what they come up with.

https://angrafx.com/assets/Security-and-Safeguarding.pdf

The AngraFX security document is not compliant with the new FCA safeguarding rules effective 7 May 2026, as it operates under the outdated PSD2/EMRs framework rather than the updated regime outlined in PS25/12. Specifically, the document fails to address the mandatory Resolution Pack (CASS 10A), more stringent CASS 15 daily reconciliation standards, and the required monthly regulatory returns.

https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/ps25-12.pdf#:~:text=1.1%20Payment%20and%20e%2Dmoney%20institutions%2C%20and%20credit,as%20whole%2C%20and%20as%20quickly%2C%20as%20possible.

I forgot you called everything perfect BFD.

Licensing failure and SP crumbling doesnt mean much for rampers I get it now. I guess I must thank you for correcting me on New shares v treasury and Tone Goh being the top DM....meanwhile ill keep focussing on licensing failure and my continued falling share price predictions because they matter to me.

Bfdinvestor

Member since Oct 2023

Posts: 11,109

Price: 0.515

No Opinion

RE: Here's where we are... sort out the indents for yourself.

30 Dec 2025 09:04

Kat the million dollar question that nobody can answer is this.

Do you, or anyone elsey genuinely believe that the BoL is so thick that it would encourage businesses to apply for a licence only to force them to stop trading the day after the application?

Chaebol

Member since Dec 2017

Posts: 12,069

Price: 0.515

No Opinion

RE: Here's where we are... sort out the indents for yourself.

30 Dec 2025 09:09

I can.

All companies that do not receive MiCA license until December 31st 2025 in Lithuania, must cease all operations in LT.

Happy days ! Yellow proving itself big time ! bodes well here.

I will admit its still a bit of a game to buy yellow for the traditional investors but the upside of risk/reward at these prices (5 cents is still ridiculous) is worth the hassle of learning to buy it imo.

Https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2024/germany/esma-guidelines-on-reverse-solicitation-under-micar