RE: SP Movement18 May 2026 14:02
36800, I'm constantly amazed at the AIM strategy of selling an initial stake after a 100% rise and running with "FREE" shares, there's always someone on some thread saying exactly the sane thing.
So, if i bought a million at 0.5p and sold 500000 at 1p , I'm running with my "Free" 500000.
Now if they rise to 20p as some people say fair value is, I've lost 500000 x 19p = £95000.
Why would anyone do that.
I bought millions of Empire Metals at 5 .73p.
I didn't sell 50% at 11.50p so i couldd run with FREE.
They are now 34p, i expect 80/85p by year end and hopefully £1. 30p this time next year.
At an anticipated capitalisation of £2 billion plus by 2030 that's over £2.50p a share.
Why would i sell 50% at 11 .50p, insanity.
Investment houses buy into rising plays, AIM investors sell out, perhaps thats why they make more money on the same percentile rise.
Finally, I bought a few hundred thousand Rolls-Royce at 70p, I didn't sell half at £1 40p, I'm stll holding at £11.50.
Why, they will be £15÷17 by this time next year.
Have you ever calculated what your strategy is vosting you?