Member Info for Cevodniya

Agree entirely mate, Badlands has disappeared.

Just to help you, here's a grammatically amended version of your post, now stop trying to be clever and this will be the last time I nention your grammatical ignorance.

I said you weren't a native English speaker, but you insist you are!!!!.

Day trader or long term trader , it doesnt matter.It is simple , if the war continues in the Middle East ,which will also get other countries involved I foresee. If it does,then you can see a steady drop in the Sp . If this war and the Ukraine /Russian war stops somehow, you can foresee a steady climb .

Just to share something on here . Met a client during the last few weeks . He is a very intelligent guy and has been working with the Government, different not defence . I asked him what does he see in the future. He said that he was very lucky not having seen world war 2 because he was born after . He said , there will be a nuclear war between the east and the west in the very near future.

I agreed with what he said and I can see that this is coming.

Long term short term , it is all about how you can succeed, not how long it takes . We have all got a different style of investment.

Any questions, just ask

Metom, if you can't tell the difference between grammatical errors and a typo, you are truly beyond help.

If you genuinely believe a nuclear war is imminent, then share price movements are irrelevant.

Metom, I'm not a daily trader somply because I'm not a chartist.

I have absolutely no way of valuing a business and therefore a share imon a daily basis

You asked me the other day for my share price predictions and i gave them to you.

The months i mentioned should easily stand out if you are a Rolls-Royce investor.

Where's the motivational specialist when we all need a pick me up?

Hopefully, Nettles will be living his life, not leaving his life, i.e dying

I and many other long term investors hope your positivity proves accurate.

I look forward to the next broker update

Trello, patience mate, patience

Nettles, you've always said £7 by Feb 25, dividends early next year, buybacks and 100% SMR.

But you've also said SMR's wont benefit Rolls-Royce for a decade financially.

However, i do believe that such an SMR contract would benefit Rolls-Royce market sentiment, lead to massive export potential and move the SP substantially.

I'll buy you as much Kit e Kat as you can eat if that prediction occurs

Hi Cat, I miss CW1966 in a way, he did write eloquently and his analysis whilst utterly irrelevant to Rolls-Royce always had a great deal of factual content.

But he showed like many investors I've know in life, why he would never make any money via investments.

Every single indicie, every duck had to be lined up to be beneficial fir a share rise, he simply couldn't think outside the box.

He thought investment analysis was like building a nuclear weapon, simply scientific fact.

He couldn't understand that share prices mive on emotions, either greed or fear and by the time all the factual evidence was available, the SP was history and had already moved.

He reminded me of many accountants I've known, be them personal ir corporate.

Incapable of personal interpretation, merely number crunching.

Ah well, I wonder what threads he's spouting his analysis now?

£2.50 end of November 23 ,£3. end of February 24, £3.50 end of August 24 and £4 plus end of February 25 and nice dividends.

Hi Mate, fo you remember CW1966 from a year ago.

He used to post 4 or 5 times a day.

He must have had 4 or 5 Nobel prizes.

He used to micro analyse everthing and somehow relate it to Rolls-Royce.

Hexwas an expert on fiscal and monetary policy, US Treasury Bonds, interpreting Fed Chairman Powell's real thoughts rather than what he actually said, UK Foreign policy, Geopolitical issues and finally military strategy re Ukraine.

If Greggs were to report a slowing of sausage roll sales in the current qtr, he'd explain in great detail how this would affect Rolls-Royce SP.

I bought a shedload of Rolls-Royce at 70p and he said they were going to 38p, confidently predicted this.

Well, they went to 65p, at 82p he sold and never posted again on this thread.

I often wonder what his thoughts on his analytical expertise are, now they're at £2 plus?

Why couldn't he see the prospective share increase?

All that knowledge, awareness, expertise in so many areas and then stupidly turning down a rise of 150%, which is only the beginning, as most of us know.

Ah well, I'm off to Vietnam again in February for another month.

Probably be there for China's invasion of Taiwan.

Should i pack an NBC suit,

Metom, I retired 8 yrs ago, finished my work life teaching a post grad MBA programme at a University .

There's no way you are a native English speaker.

Anyway, get back to your geopolitical speculations.

Me, I'm only in Rolls-Royce to make money and that's a nobrainer!.

Simply hold long-term.

Metom, simply do some research re Chinese v US naval capability.

I wouldn't correct a foreigners English, but a native English speaker?

How many times do you see posts saying should of, could of instead of should have, could have.

The usage of there instead of their.

It's not a typo, it's ignorance!.

Re UK military capability in the Pacific rim region, have I ever mentioned it?

The US is more than capable of going solo against the Chinese

What nationality are you by the way?

285000 current hold

I really think you need to do some research on US submarine and anti submarine warfare (ASW) and compare and contrast with current Chinese capability and potential capability within the next decade.

The US has decades of operating attack subs, the Chinese gave zilch.

Re technology, surely you are aware of the sanctions re technology and China.

Sure, fridges, freezers, TV's, electric cars, mobiles ect are plentiful, but cutting edge AI and the latest Chip technology leaves China a decade behind.

By all means worry and speculate to your hearts content, but serious investors in Rolls-Royce don't give a moments thought to your analysis.

I wirked in defence analysis for 30 yrs, I'm simply statong the truth, not a speculative thought!!

Czr, I agree entirely with one exception.

Nobody but Nobody on this thread has the capability of moving this SP in either direction.

Sure, re inexperienced investors negative comments can affect their judgement psychologically, but that's it.

I like yourself await the next broker update with interest.

Mate, I know English isn't your native language so I won't comment on that, but seriously your geopolitical and military comments are laughable.

China will not invade Taiwan, why, because to do so would be catastrophic for them.

Why, because the US navy submarines would simply annihilate any Chinese surface fleet and landing troop ships required for the invasion.

The Chinese ASW at this moment in time is simply inadequate to launch a seaborne assault.

It will take at least 8 to 10 years to acquire this capability, by which time the US will have replaced its already bedt in class Los Angeles attack subs with the new Virginia class.

By then Taiwan will have its new diesel electric subs on patrol.

By all means express your view on economics, inflation, passenger numbers, but please stsy away from subjects you know absolutely nothing about.

Cw1966, you are doing, you are incapable of learning aren't you?