RE: CNG Value per MCF by Guercif A4 VS LNG value per MCF at distant Tendara27 Jul 2025 20:54
I am not sure if people are forgetting, but the Oak securities valuation was solely for the mou5 prospect.
“Oak Securities Initiation targeting 148p/share valuation (Risked) solely on PredatorOilGas’s MOU-5 prospect onshore Morocco.
MOU-5 is targeting a SIGNIFICANT #NaturalGas structure with an estimated P10 5.9 TCF (trillion cubic feet) of gas.”
This obviously means PRD is worth a whole lot more. The data from that well appears to be connected with the outcome of mou3, otherwise why wait to publish your conclusions until after the results of the mou3 flow testing. I like the fact that they are systematically appraising and planning (delineating?), it’s the best chance of achieving proper market value. The question is, if Oak have not accounted for any of the other drills (except for subsequent mou5 exploration) and there is overall connectivity in some of the strata, the valuation would naturally be multiples of 148p. How many multiples is anyone’s guess, but I can’t help wondering why they valued it on the basis of just mou5 unless - either they knew that the previous wells were just so boring and full of dust, or they were in some way part of an overall understanding of 5.