Member Info for CaptainSwag

Stu the FCA is pretty toothless tbh...or else they don't really care.

Shorters play havoc with some stock...

It sorts itself out eventually if the stock is good or doesn't if there is no smoke without fire.

Personally I think there will be a financial loss with the result of the review but nowhere near the amount dropped by market fear.

I think long term anyone in at these prices will do well despite a bit of short term pain

Atan...the USA market has been a target in one way or another for a number of years. With no significant increase. Firstly it is a hard market...vast country and aggressive sales teams as competitors.

The issue is the product is not unique and also has the science against it

from my exposure to the fitness industry industry there it seems many in the US are more sophisticated when it comes to health...possible due to the nature of how it is paid..etc.

One only has to look at any sports there...martial arts..ufc...gym

They already know a lot in terms of supplements ..drugs...testing..

Anyone doing the simplest research eg putting igg tests in Google will come to the conclusion that it is the only area where the science is 100% in agreement.

Don't take my word try and find a scientific review or body approving this " snake oil" test

I haven't found anyone in the scientific fraternity supporting the type of test cnsl is trying to peddle.

There is not suddenly going to be an upsurge in sales ...required for the boom boom rocket as described by fakey.

5-0 and his quotes from the " other place" have dried up now that we are post very disappointing results.

You know the my mates mate met a guy in the pub whose dart missed the board but landed on the globe in the USA..or whatever target market it is this week for cnsl

CEO has a responsibility to the shareholders...the ones that actually own the company and pay his wages.

Unfortunately poor ceos don't give a xxxx about sh..treat them as an inconvenience

Atan...for me the results were worse than expected...i expected flat not under

the presentation was pxxx poor..they could not wait to get out and avoided answering any questions.

just the thinnest smear of jam tomorrow ...word salad of marketing glossary buzz words.

CR is just used to sitting on as many boards as possible to get paid for a few days work a year.

the interim guy does not fill with confidence

cash is being burnt...they still run the risk of having to pay £2.5m of hard earned tax payer cash back.

could you imagine if suddenly cash were down to £1.9m - £2m???

they can survive...but there would the question of a consolidation again and subsequent placings

tbh there are much cheaper shares with better prospects available in a slightly turbulent market

Science6 Nov 2024 15:06

Having lost a lot of money in odx/ cnsl..i would like to encourage any potential new investors to do some real research in the company before buying shares.

I would start by using Google. Google is an amazing tool for finding out about things, companies and people.

For example a quick Google of igg will tell you a lot about the mechanism of the test being produced.

Don't listen to me..dont listen to others on here . Some people have agendas for you to buy or sell etc.

Do your research

_-_-________________

Looks pretty consistent with what I have written today

"Anyway why you responding thought you had stopped responding, just saying."

because i believe you are posting wrong information.. and don't want others to make the same mistakes i did.

is it really that hard to understand? how many times do i have to repeat the same thing?

or we could go with your take ..that i am in collusion with others on here to manipulate an illiquid penny share stock that can't turn a profit..so that it can be taken over on the cheap by elon musk? this has been happening for a couple of years - but they are hiding the tr1s,

they have also managed to avoid publicising any of the dozen at most trades a day above back of the sofa/ giro money etc

Kate - as has been explained a gazillion times. I believed odx had a legitimate contract with the gov to provide tests that would be fulfilled as the company were tweeting "busy busy" "big things coming"

later they informed us that a month before they were aware - that the contract had actually ended without them seeming to know.

i then got access to a copy of the contract and realised that as others have put it was a "non contract contract"

i sold out when it became evident that there was not going to be any significant money through covid eg DAM contract...USA pro tests etc etc

yes i made mistakes believing both company tweets and stuff that was written on here. My bad..my responsibility...i only blame myself..i don't blame others or hide my mistake with conspiracy theories etc etc

that also has nothing to do with understanding market mechanics...trade descriptions etc etc

Yes faye is the female lorry driver - she has provided her facebook details on here as proof. However Kate Calder still belives her to be an ex poster

No if you look at the time of your corrective post and mine - i was writing at the time an missed it

no i and others on here are just a bit bemused how you come to some of the claims you make. it often seems that either you don't understand market mechanics or choose not to. we are giving you the benefit of the doubt when we try to explain some things to you. of course if you don't want to listen that is up to you.

but there maybe newbies reading that don't know market mechanics and so could get the wrong impression. At least if there is a post with a different view or explanation they can choose...and then hopefully do their own research.

i know that i have wanted to believe certain things on these forums and invest in shares where people suggested fanciful things like takeovers etc - when in reality i should have thoroughly examined the case for both sides...it would have saved me a lot of money

"All coordinated as I have said on so many occasions before.."

yes you have repeatedly said this but then you have also repeatedly accused me an others on here of being part of some conspiracy theory too. i know you are wrong on the second and i would bet you are completely wrong on first.

you provide no proof of anything..and some very illogical arguments if i am honest.

if there were 2 x 6.7 million trades - that werent cancelled out there would have been a change in SP. there wasn't

so what does that tell you? massive conspiracy on a share where the company hasnt made a profit in 7 years and has a line which all the scientists agree (for once) that should not be used or trusted or that they were indeed cancelled?

if an rns were needed it would be released..demz da rules

i am afraid the regularly used " wonder if there is a takeover...? " is just looking a bit desperate now

Never seen a NT on lse trade section - even if you click on "i" - I have only ever seen O (Ordinary) or UT (uncrossed trade)

ok lets play..they were buys - so what?

it is a share ..there should be buys and sells every day. it is in the past. what is important is that today there are only 8 trades curently showing on lse with a grand total of....*drum roll* just over a grand

cnsl just has very few that when you do get a trade larger than back of the sofa change - the rampers get excited

Atan..could well dip below 3p.

The market is battering some shares..the actual lack of liquidity is prob helping cnsl.

The presentation was appalling and they did not seem interested in addressing some of the questions..over and done in 25 mins is the quickest results I have ever seen.

The rns update was not good reading..in terms of any tangible forward good news..was all just word salad waffle..with the usual glossary of buzz words

There is often a pre Xmas sell as people know not much will happen ...and people wait to get back in...though in this case I would prob extend it until company can finally turn s profit or has something worthwhile to rns

When I saw the trades they were both listed as unknown.

I have never seen NT...only buy/ sell/ unknown

When you get two identical matching trades very quickly after each other. It normally means cancelling each other.

People are trying to help you understand the system

As you seem to be thinking everything is a conspiracy theory against cnsl..when it really isn't.

Either that or you are trying to portray something else.? .in

Which case good luck with trying that

Tbh it doesn't matter . It is the past . The Sp is where it is

.that is all that really matters

As a couple of us suggested on here .there were two identical trades in a very short space that were both classified as unknown..and the sp didn't move.

This suggests that they were cancelling each other out..usually due to someone making a human error and then rectifying

When they said that they don't know how much it will cost..i took that to mean the result rather the process. They will have an idea of the fee to be paid but not what they might have to pay at the end of it all

At the end of the day...yesterday..the sp had changed only a tiny amount..I think it was 1.x % down or something.

If there has been 2x 6 million buys ...with this share as the rampers keep telling us ..it flies on tiny amounts. Therefore 2 large buys would have made a big increase in sp.

The fact there was negligible movement means buys almost cancelled out all the sells..

So it makes sense to anyone with a brain that the two large trades cancelled each other out

Unless of course one wants people to believe otherwise

Just did a dummy buy --lol....irony is there

3.2948p on HL

no problems

Faye - exactly. it was piggie finger mistake in my opinion. quickly corrected.

the fact that there was only a tiny difference in sp at the end of the day - supports this

From rns for h1 update

Loss before tax reduced to £0.2m (H1 2024: £0.7m)

Still not making a profit

R3 is 57.95.

if we go past that could get very interesting