Member Info for CaptainSwag

What year?

December what year?

Ok....i have proved you are lying when you say your first post to TB was innocent and he replied about putting you in a coffin

you had a chance to prove me wrong - but cant

i remember clearly that you started on him out of the blue when he changed his opinion on the share.....you kept on at him..and eventually he reacted with that post

So what was the date ? it is on your phone still

Firstly kate calder - dont hijack atans thread

secondly..it is quite simple...copy n paste the coffin post or at least give us the date - we can then confirm that you are telling the truth and after your first innocent post - TB said put you in a coffin

cos that is not how i remember it - or see it according to the evidence held

i saw you have ago at him out of the blue...the dialogue continued ...and eventually he reacted with that post.

you started it and can't claim any innocence. you did the same to me but it didn't work as i never reacted in the same way..even after you followed me on other boards just to have a pop

prove me wrong?

Sorry Atan - i have been guilty of engaging with Kate. I always hope that a dose of reality will make her see the error of her ways and the board can be back to discussing the share. i should know better.

she clearly is lonely and just wants attention to speak to someone and be spoken about- the truth doesn't matter and in all probability neither does the share..she certainly shows little interest in the company from what i can see.

anyway...you are right..even the spread betters have seen the writing on the wall

Today 12:28

Here you go then I posted 'TraderBuckie you just like posting for posting sake'

That is what has started all this, he then replied That he would be the one who put me in a coffin.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today 12:44

That's a complete lie, That was the first thing that I posted towards TraderBuckie. I see you post what you think us right and then clear off.

Censored means I can choose when to respond and when not to.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so what you are saying is that your first post to traderbuckie was a complete innocent you post for posting sake and he replied about putting you in a coffin.

i have provided a post from trader buckie commenting on you atacking him on 5/8/22

since you have screnshotted everything..past the coffin post so that we can see the date.

we can there check to see if you are telling the truth or as i maintain there was dialogue between you - well before that

put up or shut up as they say

"Remember you kept asking why I didn't post anything about company?"

no that was after months and months of attacking a number of people on here..i said why don't you ever post anything about the company.....exactly the same as i said to the belgian dj

how can i be covering up his posts when i am copying and pasting them?

do you think you are the only one who keeps screenshots?

anyway shall we get back to the share? i think i have proved my point again

"You attempting to cover up for him doesn't look good for you. "

just telling the truth on what happened. as evidenced by his posting history...oops!

It is there in black and white on his posting record from 2 years ago!

how can it be a lie?

his posting 2 years ago is exactly as i remembered it - and exactly the same as what you did to me

so if anyone is lying? who could it be?

i would be careful wanting an investigation if i were you ...plenty of proof against you

you could end up in trouble for harassment and also wasting other peoples time...just saying

best just to censor me and mean it....you leave me alone i will leave you alone

I can vouch for the fact that traderbuckie was a fully fledged supporter of odx - as he had been very vitriolic to me - he later admitted he was wrong and i was right.

it was when he was changing his mind that kate went full on attack mode to him

damn must be really inconvenient having all the evidence in black and white

Well just out of curiosity i found some of trader buckie posts

this is from him - which supports my own observations completely.

5 Aug 2022 16:10

Kate...."Twat H don't you read I said I don't attack unless I have been attacked or the investment /company I was invested in."

Another lie. You had a go at me out of the blue.....I had never mentioned you or knew about you or how mad and unhinged you were back then. Also, I was a massive advocate of ODX and was posting positive things about ODX at the time of your attack so that is very contrary to your statement/excuse.

Kate..the dialogue had gone on long before the coffin post.

As I said he was commenting on the share...you started attacking him ( like you did me ) out of the blue..and were like a dog with a bone ( like you have been with me)

You provoked him many times before this.

The only reason I remember was because it followed exactly the same pattern as you had with me.

I didn't react in the same way is the only difference.

Anyway very neat you have moved the goal posts from talking about the share to talking about you.

And this after you supposedly censored me.

I will leave it there...am not interested in engaging with you or going round in nonsensical circles as you won't admit the truth

Have a good day

Kate - firstly some of us have to work. I dont have time or will to go through dozens of posts from 1-2 years ago and copy n paste the evidence.

you are the one obsessed with other posters not me. I did not care about you and trader buckie then- which is why i didnt get involved at the time and i dont care now.

some of what you posted is gibberish. i dont speak gibberish so cant understand it. but dont worry again i am not interested

as for me being invested - i was..i lost a lot of money. i stay for two reasons to help others not to lose money and another reason i told you many times

you saying otherwise is a lie ...which looks like you just trying to get into another argument? are you bored?

You did attack him first.

You provoked and it escalated.

You can't play the innocent victim.

Like how you pursued me 3 x on another board. Another person might have reacted very differently and got themselves banned .

Maybe that is what you wanted?

Kate ...if i remember correctly..trader was just posting on the share and then you started having a go at him out of the blue - abuse and getting personal because you were upset that you were losing money and he was accurately criticising the share bad performance. you were continually provoking him and it escalated

i remember cos you did exactly the same to me. starting having a go out of the blue.

in my case i tried to calm the situation by making a joke - kiss me kate from the musical...if you know the story?

which you then described as a sexist comment - when it clearly wasnt. i was just using humour to try and diffuse a situation.

since at that stage i hadn't seen a photo of you - it was hardly unwarranted sexual attention. you could have been hairy dave from edinburgh rather than Kate Calder as far as i knew.

the difference is that i did not react to your provocation -

Kate calder - you started picking on trader just like you did with me . you continually provoked him until he over reacted.

you started it - you cant play the victim.

maybe in edingurgh where you are this is acceptable but not anywhere else

Jagadish - i think you are wasting your time - i am of the opinion that the poster in question has little self awareness.

she is also looking at anything to try and discredit posting by those critical to the share rather than address the actual content - because she quite clearly cant

it does not matter..why? when? how? who? posts

is there merit in what is said????

she is playing the man rather than the ball. as i said previously she should be worrying about company performance (or lack of it) rather than anon posters on a board. if the company were making a profit it would not matter what Captain from Catmandu or Atan from Arundale writes

The agenda has always been to average down as much as possible and hope to ramp price so that she can get out at profit.

Nothing wrong but just be honest

Faye...no matter how many times I tell her. The buy or sell is just allocated as a guestimate compared to the mid position between buy and sell price.

Eg if buy price is 3.5p and sell is 3p..a trade of 3.1 is under mid point of 3.25p ..and therefore shown as a sell.

Same for all shares..not a conspiracy theory that MMS are focused on cnsl and it's handful of trades a day

But doesn't listen or won't listen