Member Info for Capabilitypete

I am relying on someone else's knowledge, but they said one of the first people to comment on the videos was the man who is dealing with the government funding of minerals. His comment was extremely positive. Hardly surprising when you compare the cost of open cast mining and the time scale setting it up. The others will come later.

He did which I hope reflects the enormity of what he has discovered.

The launch in America is due any day. Hopefully he will do a resume of recent successes and the other great assets we have. If we are lucky he may even be able to mention progress with Washington. If they are serious ours being near the surface three existing mines we could be in production much sooner than the others and at a lower cost. Its a no brainer.

Great Western Mining only got a new CEO in February and look what's happened to them.

If you can find one with drive, it's amazing how fast things can turn around. What can we do to motivate ours.

First as many of us as possible start chasing the Swedish government pointing out the need for a European supply of our resource and pointing out that basically Europe is powerless to halt global warming while most of the world ignores it. So they are holding up development for no justifiable reason.

We also need to chase him to not put anything off till tomorrow if it can be done today I am very new here so which is the most advance able we can push.

Quite a portfolio, some areas sparkle so much it looks far more than one percent, more like ten +.

Has the skarn we are to work on jointly with the Canadian company been checked for tungsten. If not could someone be sent over at night with the magic light to see if anything sparkles on the surface.

If anyone has an AI programme that analyses images I should think you could get a pretty accurate percentage reading of the tungsten from Ed's video. Much cheaper than having to send samples for analysis.

Anyone who hasn't checked this out Friday and the weekend should do so now .

Basically Ed posted some videos of two of our mines showing a lot of Tungsten. The chap in charge of the US mineral funding responded you seem to have hit the jackpot.

Interesting name for the mine DOUGH GOD MINE. US are main users of dough as slang for money.

Ed's videos must be of the walls of the mine which I doubt is very deep . We could be in production before we ascertain the full extent of our good fortune.

Cashflow this year?

With Ed and the the other guys comments about the visible tungsten, and the fact there were three mines on the sit previously, there seems little doubt this is a major rediscovery. I hope that the reason they opened three mines so close together at a time of extreme demand was because of its high percentages.

Good Morning Break.

It's early on a Saturday. Only poor ever hopefuls like us check these things at the weekend. If GMET are worth £400m we could be billion plus.

I imagine they may have to cease trading the shares on Monday while the dust settles I will be a nervous wreck by then.

When someone as experienced as Ed actually says it is amazing how many meters of Scheelite there are we must be on to a good thing. Use the chance, get in before the Americans start trading

I assume this also raises the likelihood that the copper and silver deposits run the full 3km also, as Ed was suggesting. Interesting times.

You turn off your computer and another tungsten mine turn up. See Ed's latest update below

Dear ontarget, when these figures were mentioned previously it had a bad effect on the perception of the company. I suppose many people are unaware that grades of between .30% and .66% are actually very good for Tungsten.

The mining costs per ton are likely to be similar, so If GMET 's is as low as you say and they are valued so highly what on earth would we be worth with higher grade reserves.

See todays RNS background

From what I have read on here, these near surface percentages are quite normal. It is very heavy stuff so hardly likely to lay around on top of lighter materials.

Our CEO is top class and would not be expending so much effort on a company unless he was near certain of success. Amazing progress in such a short time.

Seeing how bright he is when being interviewed I hope Washington are prepared.

I just found an official 1956 report on US minerals and it is looking very promising. One of the best areas for Tungsten was Walker Lane where we are , and in the last war Rawhide district was especially mentioned. This lies to the north east of our claim, the direction in which Ed has jut extended our claim.

Its a shame we don't have any figures for ore percentage or actual tonnage produced in the 1940s. Perhaps some will be available when Ed visits Washington.

That is a very balanced view of the company, except for the fact that it fails to mention a former Tungsten mine which only stopped production because of the end of the Second World War. Our CEO hopes that with Washington's backing we could be the first in the area actually producing. That could see the share price peak much sooner than anyone expects.

The report mentions that the Tungsten overlays some of the copper and silver. What a lovely combination of income streams.

It is clear from his interviews that Ed is a natural showman and loves it when all the strands come together in the big reveal. He is already working on the proof of viability. He is visiting Washington in May and we have the launch of our shares 22nd of May latest if the six weeks to market works out.

It would not surprise me if he has found some indicative figures from old records to surprise Washington and us with at some stage.

Does Anyone know the procedure. Will it include our past RNS statements and references to Ed's various chats, or will prospective investors have to do their own research.

Alternatively of course Ed might do a marketing job which could go down well.