Member Info for buried_treasure

This is hilarious!

So according to various posters, I am either ajs8220, Tom Winnifrith, a BMV insider or now dusterinmong.

At the risk of next being accused of passing myself off as the great Chesney Hawkes, for the umpteenth time, this is The One And Only account I've ever had here.

Like and subscribe to find out who I will be next week. Current joint favourites in the betting are The Dalai Lama and His Holiness The Late Pope Francis.

Meanwhile I'm going out to get more popcorn, and the repeat prescription for my Dissociative Personality Disorder medication.

Another week rolls by with nothing delivered.

Down 20% since those who sold out bought back in. I bet that's going down well on telegram.

How long are you mugs giving him?

I see you are about to be infested by the humungous post count of Troajan.

That is a stronger sell signal than any breakout below a 200MA trendline.

Charts are bunk.

No analysis of historical movements will tell you whether a given stock is going to move up 10% from its current price before it moves down 10% from its current price.

Here's the proof. If you could tell from historic movements and drawing a few lines which way the next material move was, all chartists would be millionaires. The only people who make money from technical analysis are those selling books about it or systems based on it.

You may as well ask your granny to read her tea leaves.

It's a RNS Reach, by definition a marketing communication with no material financial impact. Just yadda yadda noise.

I see the market reacted... er, yeah.

As I have consistently stated, as soon as Sath / Skylake come good on their RNS commitments I will wish them luck and move on.

Until then you're stuck with me I'm afraid. Pass the popcorn.

If you think that's actionable, bring it on. The first defence in defamation is... truth.

As I say, disclosure will be fascinating.

I'm clean as a whistle mate, as you will know if you've doxed me. That's easy enough to do - as you say I'm not exactly anonymous.

I've never held a position in any share I comment on. It's just not my style.

Nor have I said anything that is remotely actionable. I know the MAR better than most and am pretty well clued up on defamation too. But anyone can file a suit by all means. Disclosure will be fascinating.

My motives posted on 3 September haven't changed.

Nor have any material facts in relation to this stock. If anything the prospects have got worse with the passage of time. You could have given St Sath the benefit of the doubt five weeks ago. Not so now.

This remains uninvestable and for financial masochists only.

Not according to Companies House it doesn't. THE BE COMPANY OF UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a small, loss making concern.

The other companies in that group are newly incorporated startups not amounting to much at all.

So again I'll ask. What has this guy actually done that has you all in such a trance?

Care to pitch in your take on his CV noswej?

Go on mate, we could all do with a laugh.

OK, feel free to also list "anyone with any credibility who works alongside him".

Patxaran

You (or anyone else) care to list this guy's achievements creating, building and ultimately realising shareholder value in any entity he has been traceably connected to before riding into town here and calling himself Sheriff?

Because all I can find is one blowup where the administrator confirms they sent £30M+ to money heaven, a few nothing-burger businesses, a LLP with £1 in the bank he owes money to and some recent incorporations. Oh, and a substack where, let's face it, talk is cheap.

Lots of people have claimed lots of alchemy and value creation out of thin air for this guy, but I'm not into saintly miracles.

Have you or anyone else got any hard evidence he is the real deal?

Exactly that marty.

THE_CHAIN picked that up for them and ran with it, of course.

Like he did with "they haven't told us they've sold any so they must still hold all of them". No apology when the news that the majority had been sold was dropped halfway down a "business update" RNS.

Batman must have something on him or his old man.

Absolute nonsense Patxaran.

You do not need prospectus approval for the £2M to go in. The timescale RNS'd was "immediate".

Holders here are being mugged off. The CEO is a total dreamer who has achieved nothing in 3 months but a halving of the share price.

He should be shown the door by the non-execs and a grown-up brought in.

Patxaran

Are you suggesting that the FCA's delay in approving Crypto ETPs gives St Sath a free pass on delays putting his £2M in, after he specifically said prospectus approval was not a condition precedent?

How convenient.

As a reminder

Rode into town.

Replaced the sitting CEO.

Talked like Allen Stanford (“£1 billion company over the coming cycle”).

Announced £2M funding but actually delivered £0.

Announced ‘immediate’ £1M BTC investment but actually delivered £0.

Despite being a self-proclaimed banking and crypto expert, can’t even get a UK company incorporated, set up with a bank account and “institutional-grade bitcoin custody” (whatever that means) in three months.

Drafted a Prospectus “with a view to raising a minimum of £10 million” and which “could be completed in an anticipated 8 weeks maximum” – now 14 weeks later we are told “at present the Board is not in a position to provide definitive guidance on the size or timing of any raise”.

Lied to a shareholder regarding the Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

Since 25 June, overseen a now MORE THAN halving of the share price (1.45 mid closing 25/6)

Frankie, do you still have me on filter?

I would say 'asking for a friend' but I think it would blow your conspiracy-ometer.

"in the green bin you go bieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"

Don't go challenging him with any actual research. His soap bubble echo chamber won't survive it.

What about what?

What if they sold the vast majority at $2, retaining 1,000 shares so they can spoof THE_CHAIN into concluding and commenting they still held just less than half, and have already spaffed those proceeds supporting ongoing Recyclus losses?

I'd bet a substantial sum the accounts due at the end of the month will show my interpretation is nearer the truth than yours.

The history of this operation since flotation has taught holders to be cynical, not hopeful.