The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
will let you know when I've finished putting my latest shuffle dance on tik-tok
@tottyman... interesting... could you elaborate as it might be relevant in the future
All that cut and paste info would there regardless. Sales and distribution company for dental and medical headed up by a solicitor... not a skills match I would buy medical products from. What does the co. do that RMS couldn't do for itself. May be this is a scam company?
A lot of overlap i agree.
Last accounts for magnesium healthcare were for a dormant company.
I wouldn't touch this website selling med products with a barge pole. Looks awful. Looks phoney. I hope we are not relying on that awful photo to generate interest. Looks used. No p2f branded logo or certification mark. Awful.
@losesalot - thanks for the pointer - will see if I can re-run
@SGD27 - thanks for the RNS reference - I thought I had a good memory - but you got the march on this one. If it is those of 2018 vintage - we're a bit back in Roman times again.
Genuinely fingers crossed for pulling a Sunrise Surprise (new ****tail ?) with possible Clayton news next week.
GLA
@justone - fair dos - a reasonable comment indeed. Let's hope so.
I shifted some into a different type of mining and it's clawed a bit back rapid. Timing is everything !!
GL
@Losesalot.
Possibly he lost me at the "Romans" for a short bit - and then again at the re-show of some of the "boots-on-the-ground" holiday snaps. As much as I admire and appreciate today's webinar - any idea how many minutes in so I don't have to watch it all again?
As an aside, if it's market sensitive stuff (off take agreements / MOU) wouldn't that warrant an RNS ??
@justone - who is/are the industry players that SRES could partner with ?
It is a high risk investment to you as a PI as you are missing returns on recovery stocks in the current market.
I think you will have to wait far longer than you prefer to believe based on that we heard. The concern I have is evidenced based... manufacturers won't stop profitable production runs to allow SRES tests to complete in a timely manner. PC referred to Spring '21. The whole point of project management is milestones - timelines - risk assessments - accountability - delivery. I feel that has been missed. And the presentation almost but not quite - ventured down a fantastic path to talk about the US West pozz supply chain - and then about turned. Your sentiment is not misunderstood and neither is PC's and total credit to him for hosting today. But its missing the energy and the assurance of delivery.
@Twiggysparks - I'd like to add to my previous post that I very much want you (and others) to stake a profit from your investment in SRES. Of course, you must stand by your own views. And I realise my last post might have come across wrong - as it is intended to 'spark' any positive rebuttable of a company or commercial nature and any humour too. I look forward to hearing your words of reasoned optimism (as I am still in SRES too - 13yrs and counting - nursing a loss).
@twiggysparks... are you smoking those twiggy sparks (friendly tease) ? Even if Perlitte was up 100% it would not impact SRES. No production - no off take deals - cannot get a toehold let alone foothold in the supply chain and end market. The presentation steered away from the interesting stuff like a minnow from a pike. Would have really liked to hear more about the whole US West supply chain - product substitution - potential customer and competitor activities - to see where SRES could fit into the competitor landscape. I still cannot get excited about this as much as I would like to. As I have posted before, there is an opportunity cost to investing in SRES - which is other investment growth opportunities. Given the risk of nothing and the time to find this out - it's hard think PI money is well invested here 'currently'. I'm sceptical on Clayton - but results so soon and SP dive - I'm leaving some in. But it's less. Swallowed a loss. The sky and the screen is very blue elsewhere. One to watch and return to later... and please please ask PC to never mention the Romans again (although they at least would have got the job done by now). And as for the basics of mixing sample sizes on very crude machinery. SpaceX is putting rockets into space in less time...
@twin - nope it doesn't, over how long ? its all sunk cash. these guys are happy as non-deliverers
if BTC tips $77k by Easter we'll all be laying eggs ! :-)
mkt for pozz in cal and nev is 1.5million tonnes (c. 9mins)
he mentioned the Romans...
* "no" test results
@twiggysparks ... i have read this from you before... so why do you think kirkland 'has' a deal (will make generate) and SRES does not ? How can you hope to sell the asset if there are test results (doesnt stack up as an idea) ? (2 questions)
@twiggysparks what outcome do you want to see - when - for what value ?
@twiggysparks... its obvious. Its called benchmarking. Do not listen to PC excuses. Kirkland is monetising their pozzolan. SRES is not. Why is that? Go and read their permit. Not too much difference. Only they will be in revenue soon and SRES is not. Which would you rather be.... Take a look back 5 years ago to see SRES board strategy to produce CS. Tell me where SRES today is acceptable?
@twiggysparks... its obvious. Its called benchmarking. Do not listen to PC excuses. Kirkland is monetising their pozzolan. SRES is not. Why is that? Go and read their permit. Not too much difference. Only they will be in revenue soon and SRES is not. Which would you rather be.... Take a look back 5 years ago to see SRES board strategy to produce CS. Tell me where SRES today is acceptable?
@dip666 PC hopes a silver/gold discovery will be monetised and proceeds fund CS. SRES is reentering previously abandoned mines to profit of precious metals rise. Already had one suitor walk away. Would be ok if it was core SRES and not the scavange hunt round goat pasture that it is. SRES should be core pozz and should have been years ago as the board commited to focus resources on bringing CS to production. Failed to execute strategy announced. Dragging heels and now behind curve (ref. Kirkland)