The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
Martin, we can't let our guard down. We've tried not engaging, then they just run rampant over the board, like on ADVFN. We need to engage and shoot them down, otherwise all newbies and potential investors will see the negatives and lies when they browse over here, in the bashers' endless posts. Their money comes from bashing, not from investment, so they're not destroying their own wealth, just ours.
Come on, guys! Stop pretending they're invested like us! Liambooth are merely an instrument of people who are invested in FUM's SP dropping. booth doesn't own a single share and is only interested in his pay packet, at the expense of PIs who have invested their hard earned money in FUM. They don't have holdings or average SPs.
Haha, I saw what you did there, The.Italian! Typ for typo, to prove that you do indeed make small errors in your text, as indeed we all dooo.
Meanwhile, here's quick link for anyone who hasn't sussed out Basher booth yet:
https://www.griproom.com/fun/how-to-spot-fake-comments-on-stock-boards
Well ain't that the funniest thing I've seen today - Basher Booth accusing others of having multiple aliases! Bwahahaha! That'll be why he's temporarily retired The Three Recommendations while he sprays his cynical accusations around! And so he should, mind, as I can't be the only one who's reported him for multiple aliases whenever The Three Recommendations show up within minutes of him posting, even in the middle of the night. Surely even LSE can't keep ignoring it. Having said that, they'll be collecting four subscriptions from him compared to none from LTHs who are getting peed off with booth being unpunished, and not renewing their subscriptions. Which of course means they're feeding from the same trough as the paid basher. No wonder Basher Booth and the Three Recommendations are leading a charmed life, they're paying for it.
Booth is obviously feeling tired with all the comments against him. Well, booth, there's a good reason for that - "evil triumphs when good men do nothing". So you've got several good men standing up to your evil manipulation who are determined to not allow you to wreck this board the way you have done with ADVFN. So you may as well give up now, because we won't give up until Eroxon is the success that we, and ED sufferers everywhere, believe and hope it will be be.
Basher Booth and The Three Recommendations says, "It’s starting to feel like trying to discuss the merits of the SARS-CoV2 vaccines with a group of antivaxxers."
If only you were trying to discuss the merits of Eroxon. Instead, you've got it completely the wrong way round, as usual. We're the ones discussing the merits of Eroxon and you're the obstinate, obfuscating, lying bunch of anti-Futura bashers who flit from one subject to another each time you are shown to be "manipulating" the facts, and making up your own fictions. You'll be hanging around school playgrounds soon, trying to spread your evil message! You've already attempted to hijack social media platforms with your incessant and repetitive postings.
Well I do call someone a liar and question their integrity.
“There was no significant difference in onset time between MED2005 and placebo gel because the gel in the 2 treatments was massaged onto the glans ***** for 15 seconds, causing sexual stimulation”
It clearly shows that Prof Ralph was comparing the speed of onset between the subject, MED2005, and the placebo gel, now called Eroxon. It does not state anywhere that it was the massaging and not the gel that caused the fast onset speed, that is just the usual fabrication by booth the liar. To any normal person without an axe to grind, Prof Ralph was explaining that it was the gel causing the effect, and not the method of application. But you can rely on booth to twist it into " they would also get a similar faster onset time as Its the massage that caused the fast onset not the gel"
Well done, Basher Booth and The Three Recommendations - you got last post of the day again. How much bonus do you get for that? It must be quite substantial if you're prepared to stay up half the night, every night, to make sure you have the last word. Funny how The Three Recommendations are always there as well, it's almost like you've got three different logins.
"By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently."
"But as the SMSNA said maybe its all just ‘too good to be true’. And if the product is too good to be true then the size of the market is very going to end up being a lot smaller then you think and the ‘Director’s believe’"
"but" "maybe" and "if". Try using some facts instead of devious spin and misinformation.
"This is an easy way to tell the difference between frustrated investors, and someone who is manipulating the stock. Frustrated investors don’t post a lot. They’ll make a comment like, “Wow, I can’t believe this.” Or, “I don’t understand what’s happening.”
They express mostly frustration instead of negativity. Their comment is a believable and human reaction to a sudden disaster.
Paid basher are the opposite. They post a lot, and it’s all negative.
Paid bashers are sometimes posting 10, 20, 30 times a day. Or more. Usually on a single stock, but sometimes across multiple tickers. Their posts are frequent and basic."
https://www.griproom.com/fun/how-to-spot-fake-comments-on-stock-boards
Just because you haven't employed The Three Recommendations just yet doesn't mean you're not lying. You know perfectly well the underhand nature of what you're doing and it's high time the moderators sorted you out and banned you from the board. Luckily the rest of us are aware of the stock bashing tactics you are employing, however carefully you cover your tracks. I'm sure LSE will see through you eventually as the rest of us have.
Booth, stop lying.
"Again “it works” has not been proven. It works in a clinical setting." You just contradicted your first statement with your second.
"What was only proven so far is that the addition of any device eg gel/lubricant..." No, only MED2005 and MED3000 were used in the trial, so why lie and say any gel or lube?
Thank you for confirming everything I've been saying about the FDA trial. Shame you had to spoil it with your breathtaking arrogance by saying, "But as I said the ideal study which is what would be required in a drug trial would be oral placebo plus MED3000 gel versus oral Tadalafil plus placebo gel." How come you know better than the FDA? I think most people will be more than happy with FM71 as it is. Why would you want to perform a full drug trial on an OTC gel, which as you keep reminding us, is a device, without any of the side effects of the ED drugs? This trial will clearly prove whether Eroxon works or not, which we all know it does as has been clinically proven already. Presumably your criticism of the trial is more to do with you worrying that Eroxon will pass with flying colours, and then you'll rehash all your old arguments about not being a proper trial.
I see booth wants to put his abject failure of the FDA trial argument behind him and has moved swiftly on to massage oil. As I pointed out yesterday, he's showing his colours as an expert snake oil salesman yet again.
Booth the basher says " it will not have to meet efficacy thresholds versus a placebo" in an effort to disparage the FDA trial. When pointed out that it will have to meet efficacy thresholds versus Cialis, a proven treatment for ED, a far more difficult task than competing against a placebo, he attempts to brush it off with, "Not the same as a placebo control in a blind direct comparison study."
Everybody can see that his pathetic attempts to side step the issue that he brought up are merely last gasp attempts to rescue this particular thread of his lies, misinformation, and distortion of the facts.
Go away, basher booth, and take The Three Recommendations with you (though for the life of me I can't see why LSE are ignoring the obvious multiple identities that booth has on this board.)
"Stock bashing often occurs in online investing platforms, and as such bashers can be difficult to identify and eradicate due to anonymity tactics on the internet." LSE can hardly claim that booth is difficult to identify as a basher, as everything he posts points to that, and many people have complained about it. They should also have plenty of evidence of his multiple aliases.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockbasher.asp
booth the basher says this: "The FDA like the EU notified body is also only assessing MED3000 as a Medical device. Not a drug so again it will not have to meet efficacy thresholds versus a placebo to be approved as a Medical device." He's right, it won't be up against a placebo. In fact, it'll be going up against Cialis, a drug that has been proven over many years to work effectively. That will be a much sterner test of MED3000's efficacy than a placebo. Wonder why he didn't mention that?
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockbasher.asp#:~:text=The%20term%20stock%20basher%20refers,attempt%20to%20devalue%20a%20stock.&text=If%20shareholders%20can%20be%20convinced,an%20increased%20amount%20of%20shares.
"Again the Futura marketing Department is in overdrive"
That may or may not be true, I wouldn't know, but if they are, it'll be to to counter the lies, distortion, and manipulation that you post, booth. Are they supposed to sit back and let you spread your poison about their product? Why not stop posting your carp and you'll notice that they will stop, and the board can get back to where it was before, an interesting discussion of the possibilities of Erexon, where people offered their opinions without trying to take over the whole discussion to further their own ends.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockbasher.asp#:~:text=Understanding%20Stock%20Bashers,attempt%20to%20devalue%20a%20stock.&text=When%20the%20stock%20conversion%20completes,sell%20quickly%20as%20prices%20rise.
You done him up like a kipper there, ssl! You can tell he's rattled when ho goes off in an entirely different direction. Where on earth do you think he's going with that conspiracy theory comment and link? In fact, it was so far off topic it ought to be reported.
As we all know, bashers never answer direct questions except with another question, or in this case with a totally disconnected link.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/off-topic
His laughable copy/paste dissertation about the psychology of ED was a massive stinking pile of BS too.
https://psychology-spot.com/dunning-kruger-effect/