Member Info for Bucolic

booth asks, "Whats the expression again? The market can have a nasty tendency to remain irrational longer then some can many can remain liquid."
I somehow doubt that is the expression. That's just some semi-literate drivel that booth has come up with. Btw, it was at the bottom of his last post, so you probably missed it. I wouldn't expect anyone to read his drivel all the way through, especially when he's sprinkled it liberally with irrelevant and out of date links.

Re Last night - Well done, Basher Booth and The Three Recommendations - you got last post of the day again. How much bonus do you get for that? It must be quite substantial if you're prepared to stay up half the night, every night, to make sure you have the last word. Funny how The Three Recommendations are always there as well, it's almost like you've got four different logins, although they seem to be getting a lot of time off at the moment. And first post today - you're really putting the hours in -frantic bashing ahead of am announcement maybe? (and yes, that probably does mean I have inside information - bwaahahahaha!)

"By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently."

'Evenin' all! ***taps brim of helmet***. I see the lying and manipulating basher booth has been trying it on as usual. Good to see Ziggmann back again - he always outboxes booth the liar on every point! Ssl and The.Italian are also stuffing it to the stock basher. Had to laugh at liar booth's sneaky innuendo that Arturo might be privy to some inside info - he clearly didn't notice the phrase "must be round the corner" which obviously alludes to a strong hope that good news is on the way! Don't forget, basher booth, always examine the wording closely! Hoist by your own petard yet again, you absolute fool!
Had a good time up in town, btw, and thank you for your good wishes. Had dinner in the sky garden up the walkie-talkie one night, which was nice. Also took in the household cavalry museum where I tried on a big shiny helmet - I looked just like booth must do when he's been polishing his helmet with all sorts of menthol gels and ungents!

Popped up to London for a couple of days with Mrs bucolic. Back soon!

If we examine booth the basher's exact words, as he frequently says we should, we can draw our own conclusions.

"Yes I am a private investor so I research my investments thoroughly and repeatedly. If I make bad investments I lose money."
Clearly he sees FUM as a bad investment, as proved by all the negative posts he makes. He doesn't want to lose money - who does?- so therefore he doesn't have any shares in FUM, or maybe a couple so he can turn up at shareholder meetings and make a nuisance of himself.
The most compelling part of his statement is the fact he says "I am a private investor..." rather than "I am invested in FUM"
We have seen time and time again how booth uses his words to twist the meaning of something, so it's perfectly clear he is not a FUM investor. Which begs the question, what is he doing here? The only logical explanation is to bash the stock.
This has all been said before, of course, but I felt the need to highlight it again in case a visitor to this board wasn't aware of the history.

"So now we know FM57 was designed in a very specific way to study the GTN gel not the placebo" trumpets basher booth. It's like he's only just discovered that FM57 was designed for MED2005, what a total idiot! Everyone has known that, since MED2005 was invented! Can someone tell the bashers that Futura has moved on, developed Eroxon, got the EU stamp of approval, and are waiting to get the nod from the FDA? FM57 clinically proved that Eroxon works without GTN, so now we've got a drug free gel to cure ED - a true win/win situation!

Is that the best you've got, Mr Shouty? You should have got snake on the case, he's much better at grown up writing than you. And I won't be telling anyone there is no global issues in the supply chains. If I were to make a comment about that I would have said there ARE no issues in the supply chains. However I won't be commenting on that because this is about Eroxon, and I've no need to try and divert from that as I'm not a slippery, manipulating, lying stock basher.

PS I see you got The Three Recommendations to pull a double shift yesterday after I commented on Charlie's absence. Well done!

Just confirms you do too much research. Especially into something that doesn't concern you.

Thank you for those links, booth. Particularly the last one. 100 trial participants, spread over 18 sites in Eastern Europe and the US, an average of less than 6 patients per site. I'm sure covid is going to cause havoc! Just think, in Montenegro, the hardest hit country, had 3,548 cases per 100,000 ppl. That leaves 96,452 per 100,000 potential patients, and they only need 6!

You just made me laugh even more! Bwaahahahahaha! Bwaahahaha! Please keep trying harder - it's very amusing, especially knowing how much time you must have spent digging out those links to try and lend some support to your ridiculous and spurious initial post on the subject.

BTW, I noticed you only had Two Recommendations on your last post. Has Charlie gone off sick? Nothing trivial, I hope! Or perhaps covid is going to have an effect on the stock bashing team. How ironic (and funny) would that be?

NB - I seek not to trivialise the effects of covid, but I do seek to trivialise the stock bashing team, as it's well known that Basher Booth and The Three Recommendations are the same person.

Hahaha! Clutching at straws?

"Couldn’t an increase in COVID cases maybe have an impact on recruiting and trying to run an ED trial at some of the sites?"

Is that the best bit of stock bashing you could come up with, booth? Must try harder.

However reckless it may appear in hindsight, you still invested, even though you appear to be the most cautious investor in the world. (Though not in FUM presently, as you keep claiming, as you have proved with your sly wording on a number of occasions.)

"I do agree looking back it was “reckless” ... " As usual, the only person you're agreeing with is yourself, unless you have solid evidence that someone else called it reckless. (And not Charlie sitting at the desk opposite you or any other of The Three Recommendations)

Martin, you're forgetting rule 4 in How to spot a basher-

4. Bashers never answer direct questions except with another question.

"My only comment is that I wish others would not rise to the bait.In a way they are sharing the same cell"
Martin, do you think we don't know this? But the alternative is to give the basher free rein to control the narrative and lay waste to FUM chat on LSE. If you want to be part of a board where people aren't prepared to defend their investment, go to ADVFN. With the exception of Mike the bike, the basher under the name of LBO just posts whatever he wants with impunity, and the result is anyone who might be interested in a punt on FUM and looking for info will be put off, which of course is booth's/LBO's goal. Believe me, we have tried just ignoring him (Rule 1 - don't feed the trolls), but it doesn't work, so a few of us have volunteered to take one for the team and share that prison cell. I would much rather not have to do this, even my wife is saying I've become obsessed with this website, but I think my investment is worth protecting.
I also believe there's some truth in what Fuzzbox said about LSE's deafening silence on the subject of the basher's multiple aliases. I commented once before that booth will be paying 4 subscriptions whilst LTHs are dropping their subs due to LSE's inaction, as well as the increased traffic that the constant stock bashing and rebuttals bring to the site.
So I hope you'll be tying some yellow ribbons round the old oak tree when our stock booms and we're released!

I see someone has got some posts removed. Didn't like the fact that I've named the two different writing styles Mr Snake-oil Salesman and Mr Shouty, obviously. Oh dear!

Doesn't change the fact that I've proved beyond doubt that basher is definitely not a shareholder by his own admission, however much Mr Shouty stamps his little feet.

Welcome, Fuzzbox! Though I can't see how you're getting E-Row-Shone from it. I rhyme it with "He rocks on!" which I think is quite fitting!

Anyone noticed the different styles of writing in the basher's posts? Sometimes they are polite, well written and evasive, and sometimes they are badly written, with spelling mistakes, and very defensive. Either there's more than one person writing them, or he's flapping at being called out all the time. What do you guys think?

As Basher booth repeats endlessly, we should examine the wording. "Still had shares after the EU approval and hadn’t sold before it. " That's what he said yesterday. Because he wrote "Still had" that would mean he doesn't have any longer, otherwise he would have written "Still HAVE". Which makes him a total liar whenever he says that he's an investor, and is only researching to safeguard his investment. We now have an admission that he disposed of his shares sometime between EU approval and now.
Unless of course he was lying, and as we know, he has form in that area.

Sorry if this post seems familiar. I posted it last night replying to a thread under the subject of certain goings on in the basement which has now disappeared. Luckily I kept a copy.

dactions, I'd like nothing more than to go back to where we were before basher booth turned up. Unfortunately, he is here, all four of him, and the only way we can allow newbies and passers-by to get a balanced view of this share chat is to counteract every lie and misinformation that booth posts in his quest to knock the SP down. I've mentioned ADVFN in my posts because it's a good example of what happens when the basher is allowed to flourish, with only Mike the bike over there trying to fight back. Good luck with your top-up!
Come on FUM and make all our days and put a stop to booth's incessant bashing!

Basher booth, are you suggesting that someone who invests in antique furniture shouldn’t be constantly checking the provenance? And if an owner does keep checking the provenance then they cant be real investors?

4. Bashers never answer direct questions except with another question.
*****So true. The best he ever does is answer a different question or deflects the thrust of it*****

https://aminexunofficial.blogspot.com/p/essential-guide-to-bb-bashers.html