Member Info for Bucolic

Anyone using saffron to treat ED externally will the laughing stock in the changing rooms the next day when he reveals his bright yellow gentleman's sausage!

I see booth wants to put his abject failure of the FDA trial argument behind him and has moved swiftly on to massage oil. As I pointed out yesterday, he's showing his colours as an expert snake oil salesman yet again.

Booth the basher says " it will not have to meet efficacy thresholds versus a placebo" in an effort to disparage the FDA trial. When pointed out that it will have to meet efficacy thresholds versus Cialis, a proven treatment for ED, a far more difficult task than competing against a placebo, he attempts to brush it off with, "Not the same as a placebo control in a blind direct comparison study."

Everybody can see that his pathetic attempts to side step the issue that he brought up are merely last gasp attempts to rescue this particular thread of his lies, misinformation, and distortion of the facts.

Go away, basher booth, and take The Three Recommendations with you (though for the life of me I can't see why LSE are ignoring the obvious multiple identities that booth has on this board.)

"Stock bashing often occurs in online investing platforms, and as such bashers can be difficult to identify and eradicate due to anonymity tactics on the internet." LSE can hardly claim that booth is difficult to identify as a basher, as everything he posts points to that, and many people have complained about it. They should also have plenty of evidence of his multiple aliases.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockbasher.asp

booth the basher says this: "The FDA like the EU notified body is also only assessing MED3000 as a Medical device. Not a drug so again it will not have to meet efficacy thresholds versus a placebo to be approved as a Medical device." He's right, it won't be up against a placebo. In fact, it'll be going up against Cialis, a drug that has been proven over many years to work effectively. That will be a much sterner test of MED3000's efficacy than a placebo. Wonder why he didn't mention that?

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockbasher.asp#:~:text=The%20term%20stock%20basher%20refers,attempt%20to%20devalue%20a%20stock.&text=If%20shareholders%20can%20be%20convinced,an%20increased%20amount%20of%20shares.

"Again the Futura marketing Department is in overdrive"
That may or may not be true, I wouldn't know, but if they are, it'll be to to counter the lies, distortion, and manipulation that you post, booth. Are they supposed to sit back and let you spread your poison about their product? Why not stop posting your carp and you'll notice that they will stop, and the board can get back to where it was before, an interesting discussion of the possibilities of Erexon, where people offered their opinions without trying to take over the whole discussion to further their own ends.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockbasher.asp#:~:text=Understanding%20Stock%20Bashers,attempt%20to%20devalue%20a%20stock.&text=When%20the%20stock%20conversion%20completes,sell%20quickly%20as%20prices%20rise.

You done him up like a kipper there, ssl! You can tell he's rattled when ho goes off in an entirely different direction. Where on earth do you think he's going with that conspiracy theory comment and link? In fact, it was so far off topic it ought to be reported.
As we all know, bashers never answer direct questions except with another question, or in this case with a totally disconnected link.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/off-topic

His laughable copy/paste dissertation about the psychology of ED was a massive stinking pile of BS too.

https://psychology-spot.com/dunning-kruger-effect/

You mean that Eroxon is just like all the other treatments for ED, in that fixing the symptom could mask something dangerous. Well, it's good to know that you've got such faith in the potential of Eroxon, and acknowledge that taking anything to cure your ED comes with the standard warning about hiding other issues.

Does this mean you're turning a corner now? Just in case, here's a heartwarming story by an ex-basher who was so disgusted with his own behaviour he gave it up and confessed to everything.

https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=445&mn=25514&pt=msg&mid=1288319

The only unscrupulous snake oil salesman around here is booth the stock basher. He tells us that ED is a mere symptom of an underlying problem, and therefore Eroxon shouldn't be used in case it masks something serious, but it's perfectly acceptable to buy Viagra OTC because the pharmacist will ask a couple of questions. Apparently the pharmacist's questions are ok, but a standard warning that will come with Eroxon is Futura trying to "cover themselves", as The.Italian pointed out. Typical snake oil salesman sleight of hand there. Another example is this:

David Ralph said this, as booth quoted yesterday:
“There was no significant difference in onset time between MED2005 and placebo gel because the gel in the 2 treatments was massaged onto the glans ***** for 15 seconds, causing sexual stimulation”

This is what basher booth posted yesterday. It clearly shows that Prof Ralph was comparing the speed of onset between the subject, MED2005, and the placebo gel, now called Eroxon. It does not state anywhere that it was the massaging and not the gel that caused the fast onset speed, that is just the usual fabrication by booth the liar. To any normal person without an axe to grind, Prof Ralph was explaining that it was the gel causing the effect, and not the method of application. But you can rely on booth to twist it into " they would also get a similar faster onset time as Its the massage that caused the fast onset not the gel"

Well done ssl - you really stuffed it to the bashing team today! So much so, their backing team, The Three Recommendations, have been silent! Or maybe they shut up in embarrassment when I named and shamed them earlier on. Who knows how those twisted minds work!

booth says "But it is interesting that some on here think peer review shouldn’t be allowed on the MED3000 studies and are now insinuating any legitimate scientific questioning about any external factors that can come into play in all research..."
Actually we all welcome peer review, because it is the best way to prevent malicious comments, stop plagiarism, prevent reviewers from following their own agenda, and encourage open, honest reviewing. Which is totally the opposite of everything that the basher says and does.

"There has been no evidence ever published by Futura to prove it will work outside the clinical setting in the real world with none of the inclusion/exclusion criteria" is not the same as "It doesn't work outside the clinical setting" as booth knows full well, and yet he keeps repeating it. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that it doesn't work outside the clinical setting, which is why he never answers The.Italian's question, only posts that sentence. Positive proof he's a basher, as per rule 4 -

4. Bashers never answer direct questions except with another question.

HOW TO IDENTIFY A BASHER

1. Check the "Born on Date" Bashers create identities on a regular basis. Rarely do you find a Basher with older "Created On" date. So click on the Identity icon for more details.
*****First post was 29/3/21, exactly the week that we had that massive rise in SP*****

2. Take the time to look at the Basher's history of Posts. Go to other boards and see if their is a pattern to the theme of the posts. Bashers rarely waste time trying to blend in with "positive" posts, unless they are cultivating a new uninformed assistant.
*****Obviously no-one can be bothered punishing themselves that much, but the posts here are identical to the ones on ADVFN under the alias "LBO"*****

3. When does the Basher show up. Bashers rarely show up when activity is in at a lull. They show up when activity up/down.
****Unfortunately for us, our basher shows up all the time, day and night, 24/7******

4. Bashers never answer direct questions except with another question.
*****So true. The best he ever does is answer a different question or deflects the thrust of it*****

5. Bashers do work in teams (sometimes themselves as a team). So be suspicious of someone showing up and automatically having a Shadow to converse with who supports their argument.
****We all know who his team is - the 3 Recommendations!*****

6. Bashers always select "an argument" that can never be resolved by research.
****Actually our basher selects any old nonsense to try and put a negative spin on it*****

https://aminexunofficial.blogspot.com/p/essential-guide-to-bb-bashers.html

Morning, T.I! I see you've engaged with the basher already. Here's some entertainment for you, but also particularly for newbies who might wander in over the weekend. Feel free to add other answers and to copy/paste this after every basher comment.

HOW TO IDENTIFY A BASHER

1. Check the "Born on Date" Bashers create identities on a regular basis. Rarely do you find a Basher with older "Created On" date. So click on the Identity icon for more details.
*****First post was 29/3/21, exactly the week that we had that massive rise in SP*****

2. Take the time to look at the Basher's history of Posts. Go to other boards and see if their is a pattern to the theme of the posts. Bashers rarely waste time trying to blend in with "positive" posts, unless they are cultivating a new uninformed assistant.
*****Obviously no-one can be bothered punishing themselves that much, but the posts here are identical to the ones on ADVFN under the alias "LBO"*****

3. When does the Basher show up. Bashers rarely show up when activity is in at a lull. They show up when activity up/down.
****Unfortunately for us, our basher shows up all the time, day and night, 24/7******

4. Bashers never answer direct questions except with another question.
*****So true. The best he ever does is answer a different question or deflects the thrust of it*****

5. Bashers do work in teams (sometimes themselves as a team). So be suspicious of someone showing up and automatically having a Shadow to converse with who supports their argument.
****We all know who his team is - the 3 Recommendations!*****

6. Bashers always select "an argument" that can never be resolved by research.
****Actually our basher selects any old nonsense to try and put a negative spin on it*****

https://aminexunofficial.blogspot.com/p/essential-guide-to-bb-bashers.html

I think that FB link might have some mileage. I notice one of the posts was deleted for being fake.

Another day, another hundred posts from that scoundrel booth disproved. What a disappointment he must be to his masters.

https://heavy.com/news/2019/05/liam-booth/

Oh yeah, silly me. You're still going on about CSD500.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/live-in-the-past

Why have you linked to a condom?

Oh, I forgot to add the spurious link:

https://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/butt+of+a+joke.html

The only person who didn't get it was booth. His post "That old chestnut..." was totally hook, line, and sinker!
I thought it was Pfizer though.

Booths denials are laughable. He lies so often people don't believe a word he says.