Member Info for Bucolic

The onset of massage that causes the onset? You're not making any sense, Shouty. As usual.

Yeah, you copy/pasted all that nonsense before. Bore off, Liarbooth.

Presumably we've got Mr Shouty on as it's the weekend. All he does is copy/paste the same old codswallop that the snake oil salesman posts, so it's even more tedious and boring than usual.
At the weekends I do my weekly spreadsheet, and I noticed today that the value of my holding in FUM has increased for three weeks in a row. No wonder the Liarbooth team has been in overdrive, exceeding their daily comment targets by 50%! Whoever's employing them will be getting quite concerned, I should think. Bashers are supposed to get the SP down, not up, and Liarbooth's job will be on the line, so lets hope for more increases in SP. Double whammy for us then - no more Liarbooth and greater value in our portfolios!

Bore off booth, and stop repeating yourself.

People who feel driven to repeat specific behaviours may have obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Perhaps we'd better go easy on him...............................................NOT!

Gzelle, blocking his nonsense doesn't work. I'm well aware that arguing the toss, if you'll excuse the expression, doesn't work either, but it gives a choice of viewpoints to new readers who would otherwise just be faced with a wall of basher booth's negative posts.

ssl, basher booth has mentioned that Telegram group but as I recall his comments were totally crushed by someone and he didn't mention it again, at least not here. He regularly brings it up on ADVFN though.

I know we're all thinking the same thing. They've been MIA on ADVFN since yesterday afternoon too. Nothing trivial, I hope!
https://emojipedia.org/crossed-fingers/#:~:text=%F0%9F%A4%9E%20Crossed%20Fingers&text=A%20fingers%20crossed%20emoji%20which,additional%20finger%20on%20Samsung%20devices.

You've changed your tune, Gzelle. 12 out of your last 17 posts on FUM have been about, or to, the resident stock basher. I respect the fact you are an LTH and are sick to death of the lying manipulator, and so are we, but we are prepared to stand up to protect our investment. "Don't feed the trolls" is internet rule No. 1, but what do you do when that doesn't work? Filtering him doesn't bring the board back to meaningful debate; we've been there, got the t shirt, it didn't work, so we counter all of his stinking posts. We don't enjoy it, particularly The.Italian, who is a gentleman and much prefers to see the good in everyone, but someone's got to do it.
You'll just have to emulate Dactions and filter us as well, see how much meaningful debate you see.

We wish it were that easy, dos, however, we're determined not to let that lying, manipulation stock basher take over here. You've crossed swords with him too, remember!

Bore off, booth.

But luckily you will soon be able to pick up some Eroxon at your local pharmacy, The.Italian!

But booth, you said that MED3000 only worked because of the exclusion criteria used in FM57. Yet here you are quoting a trial for sildenafil with these stipulations:
"Patients aged 35–70 years with a clinical diagnosis of ED of no known organic cause (as evidenced by the presence of nocturnal erections, erections of penetrative rigidity under any circumstance or a positive response to an intracavernosal prostaglandin E1 dose of =20 µg or a papaverine dose of =40 mg) of at least 6 months' duration were included in the studies. Major exclusion criteria included a history of serious medical conditions (diabetes or untreated hypogonadism, significant arterial disease, migraine headaches and alcohol or substance abuse) or current treatment with nitrates, antidepressants, tranquillisers or anticoagulants. "
So basically they only included people who could achieve erections, and excluded people who had anything wrong with them.

Just proving once again what a two faced, lying, manipulating stock basher you are.

You keep posting the same old stuff, booth, time and time and time again, and trying to sound like a scientist, but you are merely a professional stock basher just copy/pasting negative things with the intention of reducing the SP. Why don't you address the astonishing discovery you revealed yesterday, that the onset time of Viagra, which all the experts and users agree is 30-60 minutes, can be reduced by mechanical stimulation? Because you've been caught (again) in one of your big fat lies that you sprinkle your posts with in order to support your negative narrative, that's why.

You still haven't provided any evidence for that "fact" you made up yesterday, booth.
"And yes oral drugs may take longer to have a Pharmacological effect but if sexual stimulation was provided earlier eg manual stimulation then there would be a faster onset..."
You have clearly discovered something astounding there. Everyone agrees that Viagra takes 30-60 minutes to have an effect, including Pfizer themselves, and yet you've come up with this ground-breaking discovery that if they play with themselves a bit, it will work faster than 30-60 minutes. Presumably, as there is no published evidence of this, you've discovered it yourself, in your bedroom. Either that or it's just a lie you made up to support your stock bashing dialogue. Which is it? The medical community awaits your response with bated breath. We don't because we know that you don't respond when caught in a lie.

Re your post at 1009. May I remind you we are discussing a treatment for ED, booth? This is not about your favourite subject, masturbating with various unguents and ointments, which I'm sure you're an expert on.

***Disclaimer*** Whilst the basher, booth, accuses me of having colleagues in a blatant attempt to infer that I'm working for a wage with others to bring down his stock bashing dialogue, I can categorically deny that accusation. As for his inference that we might be on the marketing payroll, that would depend on how you define payroll. Yes, I do have a financial interest in whether MED3000 succeeds or not due to my long position. Which is why I contradict booths lies and manipulation as often as I can. Booth, on the other, doesn't currently have a holding in FUM as he's admitted "over a thousand times" (his words - "I HAVE BEEN a holder") so why does he post such negative drivel constantly, if he's not invested? Because he's a professional stock basher, and someone is paying him to do this evil thing, which I view as trying to part me from my money.

Why would they only have found similar results in a study? If anyone had found results approaching first line efficacy as they have with Eroxon, it would have been massive news that the makers of hand gel would have trumpeted to the rafters, regardless of whether those results had been discovered in a trial or in the real world. Your argument makes no sense at all, it's just smoke and mirrors trying to deflect from the real news - that Eroxon works, and standard menthol gels don't, in the treatment of ED.
Everyone can see what you're doing, booth - lying, distorting and manipulating in your attempts to bash the stock, in a determined attempt to reduce the share price. But look - the more you post, the more buoyant he SP! Better give up if you want to achieve your objective, it's clearly not working! You nearly doubled your daily target yesterday - 17 posts! For what?

I think it's the "Ohmygodit'sthatliaragain" variant!

Booth, you said "I agree none of this is new science. Which is why its so “remarkable” that rubbing just alcohol and water could have such an effect. Except until we realise the study had non standard inclusion criteria"
I'd take exception to your conclusion. If the results recorded by MED3000 were so remarkable, don't you think that similar results would have been found by users of sex lubes with menthol etc that you keep harking on about? Surely someone with ED would have found that they got wood after rubbing on some hand gel or any of the other substances you have claimed could claim equivalence to Eroxon? As usual, you are distorting and manipulating things to support your stock bashing narrative. We all know the difference between Eroxon, a proven cure for ED in many people, and hand gel - Dermasys.
"Our versatile transdermal technology DermaSys® is tailored for each product to suit the specific therapeutic indication and desired speed of onset and duration of action offering improvements over existing products or creating novel indications with compelling commercial potential. This means that our products are highly differentiated in their markets whilst avoiding the risks normally associated with the development of new molecules and with potentially a shorter regulatory pathway."
https://www.futuramedical.com/what-we-do/our-technology/