Member Info for Bubblepoint

I think you WILL find I post with plenty of balance WG, I often state as such about the actual company and some of what they have done & do.

As for being on whatever side of a trade ! as said, it isn't a punt of any notable proportion, just a little play, and as always I will work my stock as I see fit, I see you are keen this morning to try and counter the small but valid movement of yesterday LOLOLOL...

Lets see how this plays out over the coming months ehhhhhh !!! gonna be VERY interesting.... let the numbers do the talking !!

LOLOL,,, anyone think yesterdays POSITIVE news flow hit a WG nerve lolol

Ps, WG you forget to mention Angus is turning over between £5 & £6 million a quarter, or approx £2m per month, not shoddy numbers at all, and they MAY choose to actually PAY the debt yet, YOU don't know which way they will go, so I suggest if you are going to post on the subject then it should also be balanced with BOTH possibilities lolol

And just when I thought we were all DOOMED,, who would have believed it ehhh !! progress and small but steady increments will win the day !! inshallah

WG,

My holding in this is small, nothing more than a minor play, and I will as ALWAYS trade it as I see fit, relative to news flow, it does not change my overall view of the actual company, I have CLEARLY stated my take on that, and it is by far not glowing.

It is hard for some folk to believe that there are some people ou there that post because they offer relatively unbiased industry views etc, obviously in this dog eat dog world there will always be those that look at such postings with suspicion and take some weird pleasure in constantly attempting to shout them down.

Oddly though you might notice that I put A LOT of detail into my industry viewed responses, mostly in layman terms for the benefit of others to better understand, which obviously grates on you, as it goes totally against your persistent negativity, but hey hoooooo nothing changes for me, in or out, as said, it is just a minor punt, there are far better & safer places I "could" put my funds, but the story has always interested me and therefore I put a little money where my mouth is. Unlike yourself.

As for angry !! nahhh not angry, just find sad amateur folk like yourself simply irritating. Not saying pointing out the OBVIOUS in the domain stuff is not valid, just extremely repetitive and regurgitated because it is all you are capable of.

In life some look at problems and simply stamp their feet and do nothing but complain, but there are others that see past it, look at solutions and understand it, meaning if you understand it and there are solutions then it is no longer a PROBELM !!

I know where you sit, nothing new there. lol

Actually WG, ALL you do is regurgitate the SAME info in the public domain, not exactly "know what we are talking about" is it !! your more like a really crappy paparazzi, who is obsessed with hounding the same board simply because you can.

I think ANYONE holding this stock is actually willing to "see" how 2025 progresses, be it good, bad or darn right ugly.

I don't think there are any mind blowing changes or plans throughout the year, BUT very possibly some slow and steady increments from various news flows.

Think we might need a little bit more trading activity than what we had today to start any upward momentum l-)

Ps,

You will be waiting a lot longer than I have for any form of apology for some of the despicable behaviour, and for me, you will not be getting one, as there is zero reason for that, you are what you are and continue as such !!

Funny reading how folk try to wiggle away from how they behaved in the past ehhhhhh, pmsllllll

WG,

You can TRY and bullshine others, but you don't with me, along with your sidekick/s and you REMAIN WRONG in your amateur assumptions. keep trying !!! one day you MIGHT actually learn something !! but I doubt it !!

The ONLY laughing stock on here are yourselves.

Do I REALLY NEED to explain the difference between "depletion" and "flow dynamics" AGAIN ??

You and you sidekick, seemingly like to keep referring to the rates as a valid reflection of "depletion" they are NOT. FACT.

To fully understand the level of "reservoir" depletion, the depletion that actually matters, you need to know the TRUE decline in RESERVOIR pressure.

As an example, you can have eg: 2000 psi reservoir pressure, depleted from an original virgin reservoir pressure of say 3000psi, and as long as you are ONLY flowing dry gas then your flowing surface pressure will be equally very strong, meaning you may flow and have surface flowing pressure of above 1500 psi.

The issue for SLBY is that the boundary pressure for where the "dew point" is, is already there when the wells are flowing at commercial rates. (the pressure/temperature threshold where condensate and some water is INDUCED from the dry gas flowing).

It may well be that the reservoir pressure is still quiet healthy, but because they are INDUCING liquids in the near wellbore and wellbore as they produce, (because opening the well at surface lowers the column pressure down to the reservoir as the gas flows out to surface) the ADDED liquids density within the wellbore and production string to surface means you no longer see 1500 psi flowing pressure at surface, that liquid content in the column, be it as a mist or as slugs of liquids, makes that column naturally heavier, so your flowing pressure at surface may plummet, eg instead of 1500psi, you now have 750psi, and the more you open the well, the less restriction at surface, the lower that pressure goes, and that further increases the inducement of liquids.

I have said it before, and I will say it yet AGAIN, it is not reservoir depletion as such that will end SLBY commercial production, it is how they manage the liquids they MUST produce with the gas. Liquids will be the ultimate reason for end of production.

The velocity strings will compensate and give a much longer productive field life, albeit by default at reduced flow rates because your production string/s are a much smaller size/volume. It does NOT alter the surface pressure as the column still contains similar % liquids, but the velocity is much greater and helps drive out the liquids rather than them holding back in the well etc and further affecting gas production.

There are some other modern techniques that they can apply to help mitigate the liquids story and prolong productivity, but all cost time & money. I fully expect they will produce from SLBY for at least the next 5 years, before switching to storage.

That said, if they manage to tap into any isolated untapped pockets remaining within the SBLY geology then it could change the forecast significantly, though I am not overly convinced it exists in significant volume.

The reason SLBY stopped production before was 100% due to increased liquids and the raw production methods, Angus simply upgraded to c

I don't care what you have to say Offy, it is ironic that both you and the infamous WG always seem to show up together, and yes liars, you both are, I know the background of your games, nothing has changed on that front.

As for the CPR, zzzzz I know what it says, and every CPR becomes history the minute it is published, even small changes in the field and field development can immediately alter the outcome, THUS why it is so often seen that a NEW cpr is published in line with better understandings, data, changes etc etc.

You can spout all you want about your games with WG, seen & heard it ALL before, though your views are often more balanced than that other perlock.

You BOTH work in concert on the otherside, don't forget I KNOW who is who over there from the nastiness that went on after they completed the sidetrack and I wisely sold my shares, along with tracking some of the scuz over on the otherside.

Lets start with "velocity" strings, or accelerator strings as you call them, so from your post you give the impression that these are designed to increase production right ?? otherwise why post it as derogatory to current progress RIGHT ??

Well velocity strings by the nature of their use and design do not increase flow, they simply flow less faster from bottom of the string to surface, primarily to force more liquids (condy & banked condy) from the wellbore and near wellbore.

What velocity strings do provide is a much greater overall recovery and is simply part of tertiary recovery techniques.

Gas consumption through the compressors, yes 15% is stated and is realistic, but then they are not producing enough to run both compressors, and compressors by their very design need to be running relatively optimum, therefore it is almost certain that current production is giving them a full compressor of redundancy, which means they have less downtime as they can switch between the two for maintenance or simply to share the workload.

The redundancy of one compressor is fine, they have plans to drill at least one more well, and they have the booster compressor to come online.

The booster is again part of tertiary recovery, it simply gives a little more longevity to field life and will initially give a honeymoon period of production "if tuned in very well", even after the additional energy consumption of this compressor is factored in.

The lowering of the "FLOWING" pressure in the wells associated to the use of the booster compressor will lead to more liquids induced by the very nature of what they are doing, and it is this factor that will ultimately push them to start installing the velocity strings.

BOTH of you do not need to try and convince everyone here that SLBY will be producing forever, WE ALL know that, and we ALL know that it is effectively a depleted field well into it's golden years, BUT it still does have some good life left in it to be recovered, and they are doing what is needed to ensure that they get the most from it before any possible conversion to storage.

And lets not forget, that the plant within SLBY, will almost certainly be utilized for any storage project, especially the compressors & booster.

As for CPR this n that, yes, we CAN ALL read, but CPR's are built on a lot of assumptions and generalised calculations that are often poorly suited, meaning every reservoir is unique and often one factor does not fit all, it just generalises, with A LOT of wiggle room.

Do I like Angus as a company ? no not really, a very bad history, the current BOD are improved somewhat, and still have a long way to go in cleaning up the dirty laundry of the past, they are not without fault either, BUT

You are both liers, and I can 100% assure you Wg is wrong FACT

What I do know WG is that YOU are dire on yours, I will allow my industry experience to guide me rather than some nay sayers from ADVFN who are hell bent on trying to knock absolutely anything regards this stock.

And don't try telling me or others that this is not the case, I see the posts over on the dark side lolol...

LoLOLOLOL,, god loves a trier, and WG just loves to TRY and pish on folks fires...

What a load of twaddle you speak !!

Add to that, 2 trades so far all day, nothing to see here, move along !!!!!!!! be lucky if you could get a price for 100k shares today lol...

NEWS is what is needed, lots of it and lots to come.

WG, I will not be replying to any more of your bile, you are simply trying to poke the fire AGAIN,, by spreading lies about me, you can claim whatever you like, there are still people on here who KNOW what I said, when I said it, and WHAT I did.

And yeah Putin !! why not lolol,, can you stoop any lower,,,

Offy,

REALLY !!! you are embarrassing yourself with such stupid comments.

I would NOT be taking a punt IF I did not feel there was modest potential for upside, be it short lived, or slow build.

I have ALWAYS stated my position be it in/out/shakeitallabout, SOOOOOOOO of course my posts are looking at WHY there may be some uplift potential here, DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

IFFFFFF the company sheite's on retail yet again, for little to no real justification then I WILL be the first to lambast such a move, as I have done in the past. MAYBE you simply cannot understand that there are genuine and honest folk out there !! honestly there is, but I get it, when you are part of some darkside mob of hyena's then you look at everything as a meal ! something to round up on and try to hound them to the ground... good luck lol

Ps,

I see you MOB on the darkside are working OVERTIME lol,,, lets say this, WHY ?? because if what I post was total garbage then no need to pathetically and constantly try to battle it, they would be of no value and meaningless. SEEMS I rattle some vile detractor cages ehhhhhhhhh ??? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

LETS BE VERY CLEAR WG,##

I was totally OPEN & HONEST about both my position and when I exited, ALONG WITH giving an extremely detailed REASON WHY I exited at 1.7p.

This led to a number of so called humans turning into the vilest of society and turned like a pack of hyena's, simply because they did not want to believe or accept what that I sold and the explanation as to why.

I then REQESTED my account be deleted, as it had a lot of detailed posts for which "at that time" I decided by deleting then no one gets access to any previous info or detail.

I don't need to look in the mirror, I know EXACTLY WHO are the shysters and disruptors, you think you are clever but there is a vile undercurrent with what you do.

Anyway, as said, let the market decide going forward, and I will also trade my stock (as this IS a stock market) as I see fit.

Always smart to insult those invested, you look to slate the so called bulls, with repetitive bullsheite,,,

The coming months and news flow will dictate the real state of affairs, win, lose or draw. The postings from the darkside mob is just a sideshow of disruptors who actually pray for more of the past failings to give them more to jeer about. Pretty much showing yourselves as everything that is wrong in society today.

You seem to forget that I have called a lot of this correct to date and traded it pretty much correctly too. I will let my own judgement rule my stake, and I wish for the long suffering here to see some up turn too.