RE: Lastest Update1 Jan 2021 18:28
Proselenes - again an article full of Ifs from the opponent's side
The comment "Ms Banona-Adderley's affidavit thus represents the activists' latest attempt to find holes in BPC's arguments" just shows that the opponents of drilling are still clutching at straws.
Rochelle Newbold, director of the newly-formed Department of Environment, Protection and Planning (DEPP), has already rejected the argument by environmental activists that a new EA and public consultation was required because BPC had changed its drill ship to the Stena IceMAX.
"The DEPP upon receiving notice of the change in the rig indicated a 'no objection' to the change after the review and consultation with its independent environmental consultants," she alleged in an affidavit, referring to Black & Veatch. "The indicated changes by BPC had no relation to the impacts associated with the EIA, and therefore no 'new approval' was warranted.
#"Upon notice of the change in the drilling contractor, the Department was provided with the documentation regarding information and specification of the rig, its experience, background and capabilities.
#"This information was reviewed by the DEPP and the independent international environmental consultant, Black & Veatch, and no issues were identified which would have compromised the identified and required undertakings in the Environmental Management Plan."
#Arguing that the environmentalists' arguments were "misconceived", Mrs Newbold argued that public consultation on BPC's project had taken place as required under the Petroleum Act 2016. This, though, was rejected by Fred Smith, the activists' attorney, who said: "They're scraping the bottom of the historical barrel for consultation."
Give it a rest Proselenes