Member Info for Brombarb

Riv think the 12000' came from the permit approval and in the absence of any more factual information got into the article and that is all.

V111JAS hopefully pages 15 & 17 are now the plan and past statements made probably best ignored.

Although talk has been of the Nanushuk & Torok do not forget the SeaBee formation.

Noted that Horseshoe#1 permit approval talked of up to 9000' but they possibly did not go that deep, not sure TD has ever been disclosed.

"The well will be slightly deviated with a true vertical depth of less than 9,000 feet"

http://www.alaskajournal.com/2019-01-29/busiest-exploration-season-decades-planned-winter#.XFLhr9JCdYc

http://www.alaskajournal.com/2019-01-30/construction-spending-forecasted-rise-10#.XFLiOdJCdYc

Jiddy agree, we have the strategic few acres at Yukon, the ASRC acres and of course the GBP fire sale acres, all have made sense and hopefully will bear fruit.

following discussions yesterday about targets am pleased that we are going for the Torok ( after all seems logical) but surprised at shallowness of drill as other slides appear to suggest Torok is deeper.
I obviously do not know what I do not know, more research needed :-)

For those interested presentation on Tarn Pool is in 88E WIKI DOG page or
http://dog.dnr.alaska.gov/Documents/ResourceEvaluation/TarnReservoirQualityPresentation.pdf

Brent $61.85 (09:19)

http://www.livecharts.co.uk/MarketCharts/brent.php

9.7M or 0.15% of all shares.

0.020AUD = 0.0110781GBP
0.019AUD = 0.0105247GBP

ASX(close)
1.9¢ 0.00%
Volume9.192M

Chi-X (close)
2.0¢ 2.63% up
Volume466.5K

Bridgedogg1 Torok has always been a target, Nanushuk 4 & 5 are the primary target, but Torok has great potential and I am sure that if DW believes it worthwhile to penetrate the Torok it will be done.
But that is just my opinion best wait an ANN.

Stockdale to give cd66 his due what he pointed out is correct, RMP's SP as quoted by the London Stock Exchange is not nearly 5 times ours.
I do not agree either with his views on the torok formation which seem at odds with USGS and DOG data, strange that he takes the comments of another CEO as more trustworthy than other sources.
By the way I have not seen the RMP presentation so did the CEO/MD of that company actually dismiss the Torok formation?

D45 perhaps you know more than Paul Decker I do not know.
Malguk & Heavenly are rated as discoveries, guess where they are?

" Undiscovered conventional resource in Nanushuk / Torok upgraded to 8.7 billion barrels of oil by USGS (December 2017)
• USGS assessment high graded the Torok turbidites for ‘yet to be discovered oil’ across the Company’s Western leases at Project Icewine
• Development of Brookian Nanushuk (topset) and Torok (turbidite) conventional discoveries via horizontal drilling, extended laterals, multi stage stimulation and re-injection of produced gas/water – now routine practice on the Slope"
http://clients3.weblink.com.au/clients/_88energy/headline.aspx?headlineid=6898910
http://dog.dnr.alaska.gov/Documents/ResourceEvaluation/20181213_BrookianTopsetStratPlay_PetrolSysElements_AGS.PDF

consortium drill, not sure if DW is able to or willing to advise anything unless via official "consortium" news.
Torok always been a target zone, why would we not take advantage and drill to TD in permit.
Best to wait for official news.

Guz getting back to normal, compared to what some have experienced pretty minor and inconsequential.
PC had a good rest though :-)

Jiddy I am not worried when news arrives, could be tonight could be next week, think most of those I think you are talking about are long gone, along with some of the spurious predictions that they made.
Stay appy.

wise words SeaHawk with time differences etc. between Alaska and Perth it can be difficult to predict exactly when news may arrive :-)

stay appy everyone, on 24th Jan DW stated
Rig mobilisation to commence in ~7 days
Weather conditions appear ideal to ensure ice road construction completion,
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/usa/prudhoe-bay

3D technology has improved dramatically particularly with inversion as we have at Icewine & Yukon which enables better chance of distinction between HC & H2O, Winx is modern 3D with analysis via Stolt Migration Technique, local and recent history would suggest subject to seal we should encounter HC in at least one of the target areas.

contracted rig has capacity to 14500'.

torok has always been part of the stacked targets and we are permitted to 12000'.

Think some can only see the Nanushuk part of he play due to historic success rate

Brent $61.14 (08:22)

http://www.livecharts.co.uk/MarketCharts/brent.php

7.9M or 0.13% of all shares

0.019AUD = 0.0104591GBP

ASX(close)
1.9¢ 0.00%
Volume 6.749M

Chi-X (close)
1.9¢ 0.00%
Volume 1.193M

BB32 it is interesting that Bex also bought into the GBP leases in which we bought a working interest in last year.
see example below;
http://dnr.alaska.gov/projects/las/#filetype/ADL/filenumber/392300/landflag/y/searchtype/casefile/reporttype/abstract
Suggests that Bex are still an active partner and able to raise finance.