Member Info for Brombarb

Western Blocks is operationally on the backburner, we can't do anything now until Feb 2020 at the earliest, the consortium will review 3D and possibly re analyse based on data gathered.
I would be happy for another member of the consortium to lead, highly likely Erik may still head up the drill unless we need him - please.
Erik may be busy with Yukon drill (Jade Energy) as detailed in Petroleum News a few week back, he does have a plane though :-)

SeaHawk that was a bad RNS but its 3 years ago now, subsequently we spiked higher it did not kill the business and I think that until DW leaves you will have to put up with his style of ANN warts and all.
When we have really positive news I doubt that the style of writing will actually make any difference.
On the subject of #2V or 2#H, had we pushed a horizontal in the wrong place in that 128' minimum thickness of HRZ we may scored or we may have ultimately learnt less than we finally did with the vertical, no one here will ever know unless they are able to interpret all the well data when finally released.
As for heating equipment the JV took a decision, they are eminently more qualified to do that than any of us armchair pundits, it happened, it's history now and as subsequent events proved would have made no difference in any case, excepting it may have avoided the second flow test.

Elizabeth Pattillo might be OK at geology
Birkbeck College, London Uni, UK; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Uni of Western Australia
Degree Name
Bachelor of Science (1st Class Hons); Post Grad Education,

Field Of Study
Geology/Earth Science, General

In the past Dave Wall has talked about In House interpretation of 3D, I know that Great Bear utilised links with Stanford University and I have seen evidence of that in reports, thesis & well data, perhaps we utilise all sorts of resources.

sorry did not spot that thread title

Pandy2 88E is also ASX, a bit more tightly regulated, but even main market companies can get away with almost anything, like so many things it is down to the BOD and due you trust them to use their best endeavours to secure share holder wealth.
Best of Luck, lets hope we come out of this appy.

Lti perhaps you misread my post, I have not stated any deal is done.
Conrad understood :-)

kevin0541 interesting that full inversion analysis was only made available October, 2018.
Not sure about the hint to tier 1, perhaps I missed something.

conrad02 I was not referring to you earlier, I am sure everyone here is a little frustrated at the moment , the ANN indicates some progress but that is all at this stage, what really matters is seeing that deal done (positive) and dusted.
Best of Luck.

lebugue-addick in truth I expected some reaction, but it did not happen.
The content of the ANN indicated things have progressed but that is all, no deal imminent it seems.
I have no more insight than anyone else.

I read as positive progress if nothing certain yet, DW has AGM by 15/04/2019, hopefully will be some meat on the bones by then.
Still amazed by the strategies of a few here, they may not be impressed by the news, they may have reservations but if they actually are invested why so stridently anti, surely best to keep mouths shut or post neutrally and hope for SP to rise.
Particularly when you read the unresearched drivel and even mistruths of a few.
Just a personal opinion.

5.3m or 0.08 no panic either way

0.014AUD = 0.00748015GBP

ASX (close)
1.4¢ 0.00%
Volume3.315M

Chi-X (close)
1.4¢ 3.45% down
Volume1.972M

and irrigated :-(

Sinopec is an annual event :-)

Sprintman may be true for a few :-)

Some strange strategy talking down at every opportunity the share that you are invested in, unless of course ………..

09:25 Think that might create an issue for the company who may be construed as having made a false statement in ANNs and indeed the Annual Report to Shareholder.
May be that at that point ASX may demand an explanation from the company to prevent a false market occurring under rule 3.1B.
I am unsure how often this rule is applied and indeed may have read it wrong, but would our BOD take the risk of breaching ASX rules or indeed the Australian Corp. Act.

https://search.asx.com.au/s/redirect?collection=asx-meta&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asx.com.au%2Fdocuments%2Frules%2Fgn08_continuous_disclosure.pdf&index_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asx.com.au%2Fdocuments%2Frules%2Fgn08_continuous_disclosure.pdf&auth=U2A12tEB80rmHBkiDKopQw&profile=web&rank=1&query=false+market

9.8M or 0.15%

0.014AUD = 0.00748676GBP

ASX(close)
1.4¢ 3.45% down
Open1.5¢
Volume8.055M

Chi-X (close)
1.5¢ 3.33%
Volume1.750M

DE I have mentioned a few times the limitations of the 3D analysis carried out by OEL, but possibly in the constraints of the base data there may have been limits to what could have been done.

no way will it be free of charge

This is very close to a repeat of the COP Bear survey completed last winter, main difference it that is runs further North to include Western blocks, will run South to TN004 West of Icewine.

This is a multi client survey.

Winx is located U008N005E Sec 21

http://dog.dnr.alaska.gov/Documents/Permitting/NorthSlope/OperationPlans/2019/20190315_SAE_Kuukpik_3D_Decision.pdf